For years now The Gateway Pundit has reported on the attempted coup against President Trump and his administration. We now know that this coup was real and involved several intelligence officials as well as the Hillary Clinton Campaign, Barack Obama, Joe Biden with the undying support from the fake news mainstream media.
Now they are caught.
Any other human being would have folded under the pressure. Not President Donald Trump. He was harassed, attacked and smeared his entire presidency by thousands of Democrats and the far left media complex. But he never folded. He excelled with record economic numbers, historic peace deals, a secure border, and an America-First foreign policy.
Now there is more evidence that the US intel community and Democrat politicians targeted president Trump after he was elected and while he was in office.
CIA notes of the Sussman meeting confirm that the intel community and Democrats were targeting and spying on President Trump after he was in office.
These people need to be charged and face trial. We either have a country or we don’t.
An ex-CIA official who signed a letter along with dozens of other former U.S. intelligence officials in the backstretch of the 2020 presidential election warning that stories about Hunter Biden’s laptop being disinformation now says his efforts led to then-President Trump losing reelection.
“I take special pride in personally swinging the election away from Trump,” John Sipher, a former CIA deputy chief of Russian Operations, recently posted on Twitter. “I lost the election for Trump? Well, then I [feel] pretty good about my influence.”
The October 2020 open letter – released as voters were making final decisions about whether to reelect Trump or elect Democrat Joe Biden – was signed by 51 ex-intelligence officials including former National Intelligence Director James Clapper, former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, and former CIA Director John Brennan.
Hunter Biden is the son of President Biden. The discovery of the laptop at a Delaware repair shop and its content, reported first by the New York Post, was of major interest in 2020, considering the questions surrounding Hunter Biden’s overseas business dealings while his father was vice president.
Twitter suspended the Post’s account after the news outlet used it to link to the laptop story.
“We want to emphasize that we do not know if the emails, provided to the New York Post by President Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani, are genuine or not and that we do not have evidence of Russian involvement – just that our experience makes us deeply suspicious that the Russian government played a significant role in this case,” the letter in part reads.
Former President Donald Trump is calling for the Clinton-appointed judge to be recused from his lawsuit against Hillary Clinton, the Democratic National Committee, and nearly 50 others for sabotaging his presidency.
Trump discussed the lawsuit during an interview with BlazeTV host Glenn Beck.
The accusations in the 108 page complaint include, but are not limited to, RICO conspiracy, injurious falsehood, conspiracy to commit injurious falsehood, malicious prosecution, Computer Fraud and Abuse Act violations, and theft of trade secrets.
“It was totally corrupt what they did,” Trump said.
The Blaze reports that “the lawsuit will be heard by U.S. District Court Judge Donald Middlebrooks, who was appointed by former President Bill Clinton. In 2015, Middlebrooks threw out a civil racketeering suit filed against Hillary Clinton that claimed she had used her private email server and position as secretary of state to promise changes in U.S. foreign policy in exchange for speaking fees and donations to the Clinton Foundation.”
EXCLUSIVE: Former President Donald Trump tells me he'll "probably ask for a recusal" to deal with of the "total conflict of interest" that his lawsuit against Hillary Clinton and the DNC is going to a Clinton-appointed judge. pic.twitter.com/gxAW8M383V
Trump told Beck that this is a conflict of interest and that Middlebrooks must recuse himself immediately.
“We have a judge that was appointed by Bill Clinton. And who knows Hillary Clinton very well. And we’re suing Hillary Clinton,” Trump said.
“Now, the problem we have, though, is if you have a judge that’s going to throw out the case, and you have to go through appeals. Yep, I think you have a great appeals section. But we’ll see. So we’ll probably ask for a recusal. Maybe a change of venue. But not a change as much as a recusal,” he added.
Trump is seeking $72 million in damages in the lawsuit.
Authors Note: There is, of course, the surface-level explanation of what is happening in Ukraine right now; which will be altered depending on who you ask or what pundit you are listening to. If history is any indicator, there are always deeper reasons for these events on the world stage that the general public is often kept in the dark about for obvious reasons. In this article, we are going to compile as many details as we can about what is happening in Ukraine and leave it to the reader to decide what they believe (IE what real journalism is supposed to do). It should also be noted that certain portions of this report contain the author’s opinion.
Late Wednesday night, Vladimir Putin declared a Russian military operation against Ukraine. Immediately after the public address, Russian forces launched an attack on several locations, causing explosions across the country and including the Capitol of Kyiv. Throughout the evening and early hours, cruise and ballistic missiles hit certain strategic points including airports and military bases.
“According to the Armed Forces of Ukraine, the following airports/airbases were damaged by missiles: Boryspil (Kyiv), Chuguev/Chuhuiv (Kharkiv), Kramatorsk (Donetsk), Kherson, Kulbakino (Nikolaev, east of Odessa) and Ozerne (Zhytomyr).
The interest of doing damage early on in attacks is to prevent an air offensive against Russian forces on the ground or in the air. At the same time, with calculated and GPS-guided attacks, Russia manages to destroy the Ukrainian defense arsenal with weapons, fighters, aircraft, radar, missiles and anti-missile systems.”
Several videos surfaced in the wake of the attacks:
Reports of attacks on all major cities in Ukraine. Bombing in the capitol of Kyiv. God bless the people of Ukraine as they go through this. pic.twitter.com/WOhkkfPpQd
Another clip here shows the Ukrainian Military base at Kulbakinko’s runway destroyed by a Russian ballistics missile attack.
Footage from inside the Ukrainian Kulbakino Air Base as the runway and another position was destroyed by Russian ballistic missiles. pic.twitter.com/1kM7XUoLbl
In one striking video, a group of individuals is seen fleeing the Ivano-Frankivsk International Airport when a cruise missile speeds on screen and strikes the building behind them:
The Russian forces were even able to hit several of Ukraine’s key military infrastructures, including military warehouses that held hoards of ammunition.
Video footage caught in the early hours a massive exodus of civilians from Ukraine’s capital.
The Effects
Stocks plunged 770 points on Thursday morning following Russia’s surprise invasion of Ukraine.
The Biden team, who some claim is hell-bent on destroying the USA, is now ending the program that Trump put in place to protect the US from China. The timing is impeccable considering that his weakness provoked Russia and an even bigger threat is postering to take Taiwan.
As per Fox News:
The Department of Justice announced Wednesday that it is ending its “China Initiative” program that was aimed at preventing spying by the Chinese Communist Party, and launching a new, “broader approach.”
The China Initiative was started in 2018 under the Trump administration to protect U.S. national security against Chinese spying on U.S. intellectual property and in academia. The DOJ website said it was aimed at “identifying and prosecuting those engaged in trade secret theft, hacking, and economic espionage,” as well as “protecting our critical infrastructure against external threats through foreign direct investment and supply chain compromises.”
That program is coming to an end. In its place, the DOJ is instituting a new “Strategy for Countering Nation-State Threats.”
“Our goal with this strategy is to take a comprehensive approach that draws on the full extent of our tools and authorities to address the alarming rise in illegal activity from hostile nations,” Assistant Attorney General Matthew Olsen of the DOJ’s National Security Division said. “This includes growing threats within the United States and to Americans and U.S. businesses abroad.”
(Note that Ukraine is not currently a member of NATO.)
The World’s Initial Response:
Ben Harnwell on Steve Bannon’s War Room claimed that there are no NATO troops in Ukraine and no plans to deploy them. Of course that is subject to change. After Harnell reported this, The head of NATO, Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, responded to questions regarding the situation in Ukraine. The AP reported:
NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg warned Thursday that the military alliance would defend every inch of its territory should Russia attack a member country, as he slammed Moscow for launching a brutal act of war on Ukraine.
Russia launched a wide-ranging attack on its neighbor, hitting cities and bases with airstrikes or shelling. Ukraine’s government said Russian tanks and troops rolled across the border and accused Moscow of unleashing a “full-scale war.”
Speaking after chairing an emergency meeting of NATO envoys, Stoltenberg said the 30-nation security alliance will continue to beef up its defenses on its eastern flank near Ukraine and Russia. He said U.S. President Joe Biden and his NATO counterparts will hold an online summit on Friday.
“Russia has attacked Ukraine. This is a brutal act of war. Our thoughts are with the brave people of Ukraine,” Stoltenberg told reporters. “Peace in our continent has been shattered. We now have war in Europe, on a scale and of a type we thought belong to history.”
The EU has said that they will block western asseste, and promised heavy targeted sanctions.
Some people view this attack as an extension of what happened last August with the bungled withdrawal from Afghanistan, projecting our leaders’ weakness for the wolves of the world to see. President Donald Trump offered his perspective moments after the initial attack (well before the world heard anything from our current president).
Then you have establishment RINO and career politician Mitt Romney blaming this all on the “shortsightedness” of Donald Trump’s America First policies.
He released a statement on Twitter last night not long after Russia invaded Ukraine.
Taiwan’s air force scrambled again on Thursday to warn away nine Chinese aircraft that entered its air defense zone, Taiwan’s defense ministry said, on the same day that Russia invaded Ukraine, a crisis being watched closely in Taipei.
Taiwan, which China claims as its own territory, has complained of regular such missions by the Chinese air force over the last two years, though the aircraft do not get close to Taiwan itself.
The number of aircraft involved was well off the last large-scale incursion, 39 Chinese aircraft on January 23, and since then, such fly-bys have been sporadic with far fewer aircraft.
The ministry said the latest mission involved eight Chinese J-16 fighters and one Y-8 reconnaissance aircraft, which flew over an area to the northeast of the Taiwan-controlled Pratas Islands at the top end of the South China Sea.
— 國防部 Ministry of National Defense, R.O.C. 🇹🇼 (@MoNDefense) February 24, 2022
Consider This
There seems to be a lot of individuals sharing their perspectives on the situation, and while their experiences are subjective, counter to the western narrative, and in some cases could be potential Russian Propaganda, the news is meant to be shared not withheld.
Consider this, if Russia decided to install a dictatorship or formed a military alliance in Mexico where they ran all kinds of shady money laundering activities and flooded the country with weaponry, would it be unreasonable for the US to be concerned about this sort of thing or should we just acknowledge their sovereign right to do so? Does the political elite, who have collectively had their hands in the Ukraine cookie-jar for years, only rush to outrage over Ukraine out of a sense of genuine compassion or is it something more personal?
We are not trying to let Russia off of the hook, rather trying to paint a broader, more nuanced picture of what the situation looks like from all perspectives.
Updates will be provided in a separate post.
We pray for the people of Ukraine who are caught in the crossfire, and for a swift resolution to the fighting.
CNN’s long history of establishment bias may be nearing its end.
Following the resignation of CNN’s president, Jeff Zucker, the network’s future may trend away from Left-leaning political opinions, and more towards impartial news reporting.
Later this year, CNN will finalize its merger with Discovery Inc., and John Malone, the CEO of Liberty Media, is expected to have notable control over the news site. Liberty Media is Discovery’s largest shareholder, giving Malone a 25% voting share in the company which will be taking control of CNN.
80-year-old Billionaire, John Malone
The businessman’s past actions/statements have led many to believe that Malone will aim to adjust CNN’s Liberal biases towards more “impartial” journalism.
In 2017, Malone donated $250,000 to Donald Trump’s inauguration. Back in 2019, Malone boldly stated that he “would like to see CNN evolve back to the kind of journalism that it started with, and actually have journalists, which would be unique and refreshing.”
"I would like to see CNN evolve back to the kind of journalism that it started with, and actually have journalists," claimed John Malone, the top shareholder of Discovery, which is poised to take over the network. pic.twitter.com/QnNhQwgBY0
“I do believe good journalism could have a role in this future portfolio that Discovery-TimeWarner’s going to represent,” Malone also told CNBC.
The network’s ratings and viewership numbers have steeply declined this past year, fueling speculation that there will be some significant changes made under new ownership.
Without Zucker’s influence, Discovery’s CEO David Zaslav will undoubtedly hold more control over CNN operations. And, while Malone could have a great deal of influence over CNN’s fate, Zaslav has not yet made any indications about his views on the political biases or future of CNN.
OPINION: This article contains commentary which reflects the author’s opinion
Former President Donald Trump addressed reports that he and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis are having issues with each other during an interview on Sean Hannity’s Fox News program, Thursday evening.
Previous reporting over the past couple of weeks indicated that Trump and the popular GOP governor may be experiencing a falling out as DeSantis’ stock among GOP voters appeared to be rising as a potential presidential contender in 2024 even as Trump has been teasing another run himself.
The New York Times, for instance, reported this week:
At its core, the dispute amounts to a stand-in for the broader challenge confronting Republicans at the outset of midterm elections. They are led by a defeated former president who demands total fealty, brooks no criticism, and is determined to sniff out, and then snuff out, any threat to his control of the party.
That includes the 43-year-old DeSantis, who has told friends he believes Mr. Trump’s expectation that he bend the knee is asking too much. That refusal has set up a generational clash and a test of loyalty in the de facto capital of today’s G.O.P., one watched by Republicans elsewhere who’ve ridden to power on Mr. Trump’s coattails.
Many conservative media stars, most of whom have long been some of Trump’s most vocal supporters, have been hyping DeSantis in recent months for the governor’s rejection of Covid-related mandates and the constant hammering of President Joe Biden. But the support has increased in intensity in recent weeks, a spike easily noticeable on social media and podcasts throughout the conservative media ecosystem. That support is key in helping DeSantis further expand his footprint with influencers in Republican primary politics ahead of his 2022 reelection and as he weighs a 2024 White House bid.
Hannity went on to ask Trump, point-blank if reports claiming a feud had begun between him and DeSantis were legitimate after he said he was recently informed that DeSantis indicated that there was not “any conflict or bickering” between the two and that it was “total BS” manufactured by the media.
“Is he right?” Hannity asked.
“Well, he is right,” Trump responded. “I get along great with Ron. Ron was very good on the Mueller hoax. He was right up front along with Jim Jordan, and all of the rest of them, they were fantastic. The Republicans really stuck together. And it was a great thing. And Ron was one of them. And Ron wanted to run and I endorsed him. And that helped him greatly,” Trump said.
“And he went on and he’s done a really terrific job in Florida, and I think you know, Ron has been very good,” Trump continued. “He’s been a friend of mine for a long time. It’s totally fake news.
“I think Ron said last week, he said it very publicly, he says the press is never going to get in the middle of my friendship with Donald Trump, we’re not going to do that stuff. And he said it very strongly, I thought it was very interesting, actually. And very nice,” Trump added.
“But he said that, and I agree with him on that 100%. No, I have a very good relationship with Ron and intend to have it for a long time,” he continued.
Also, a spokesperson for DeSantis has publicly refuted the reports of a growing rift.
“It’s not a coincidence that this fabricated media narrative emerged during the worst week of Biden’s presidency to date, as it became clear Biden would not be able to deliver on Build Back Better, enact sweeping legislation to federalize elections, or ‘shut down the virus’ as he had promised during his campaign,” the spokesperson told People Magazine.
“Governor DeSantis remains focused on Florida and works every day to earn Floridians’ support for re-election in November of this year,” she added.
The Department of Justice admitted this week to running secretive DOJ “commandos” at the January 6 protests in Washington DC.
Four Trump supporters died that day including two women who were killed by Capitol Hill Police. A third woman was nearly killed but was rescued by Green Beret Jeremy Brown.
The DOJ Commandos were given “shoot to kill” orders.
Now they’re admitting the government did in fact have commandos at the capitol on Jan. 6.
After nearly a year this information is finally coming out. And they accused this website and others of being conspiracy nuts for reporting on the feds in the crowd that day.
We will likely never know how many feds were working that day to sabotage the peaceful protests.
On Sunday, January 3, the heads of a half-dozen elite government special operations teams met in Quantico, Virginia, to go over potential threats, contingencies, and plans for the upcoming Joint Session of Congress. The meeting, and the subsequent deployment of these shadowy commandos on January 6, has never before been revealed.
Right after the New Year, Jeffrey A. Rosen, the acting Attorney General on January 6, approved implementation of long-standing contingency plans dealing with the most extreme possibilities: an attack on President Donald Trump or Vice President Mike Pence, a terrorist attack involving a weapon of mass destruction, and a declaration of measures to implement continuity of government, requiring protection and movement of presidential successors.
Rosen made a unilateral decision to take the preparatory steps to deploy Justice Department and so-called “national” forces. There was no formal request from the U.S. Capitol Police, the Secret Service, or the Metropolitan Police Department—in fact, no external request from any agency. The leadership in Justice and the FBI anticipated the worst and decided to act independently, the special operations forces lurking behind the scenes.
“I believe that DOJ [Department of Justice] reasonably prepared for contingencies ahead of January 6, understanding that there was considerable uncertainty as to how many people would arrive, who those people would be, and precisely what purposes they would pursue,” Rosen later told Congress. He stressed that his department “no frontline role with respect to crowd control,” that they were focused on “high-risk” operations.
The contingency units meeting on January 3 included the FBI’s Hostage Rescue Team, the FBI’s national “Render Safe” team, an FBI SWAT team from the Baltimore Field Office, Special Response Teams from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), and the U.S. Marshals Service Special Operations Group…
…FBI tactical teams arrived on Capitol Hill early in the day to assist in the collection of evidence at sites—including the Republican and Democrat party national headquarters—where explosive devices were found. FBI SWAT teams and snipers were deployed to secure nearby congressional office buildings. Other FBI agents provided selective security around the U.S. Capitol and protection to congressional members and staff.
A tactical team of the Hostage Rescue Team was one of the first external federal agencies to actually enter the Capitol after protestors breached the building. In addition to augmentation of emergency security assets, one team coordinated with the U.S. Capitol Police and Secret Service to provide additional safeguarding of Vice President Pence, who had been moved to the underground parking structure beneath the Capitol, from where he was supposed to evacuate. But Pence refused to leave the building and stayed underground instead.
The presence of these extraordinary forces under the control of the Attorney General—and mostly operating under contingency plans that Congress and the U.S. Capitol Police were not privy to—added an additional layer of highly armed responders. The role that the military played in this highly classified operation is still unknown, though FBI sources tell Newsweek that military operators seconded to the FBI, and those on alert as part of the National Mission Force, were present in the metropolitan area. The lingering question is: What was it that the Justice Department saw that provoked it to see January 6 as an extraordinary event, something that the other agencies evidently missed.
Today was day 3 of the 6-week trial of British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell, who’s been accused of sex-trafficking minors. The first accuser, going by the pseudonym “jane”, took the stand again this morning at the Thurgood Marshall Courthouse in lower Manhattan.
“Jane” testified yesterday, claiming that Ghislaine lured her into Epstein’s orbit. She also claimed that while visiting the late financier’s mansion in Palm Beach, Florida, Maxwell and Epstein led her upstairs to his bedroom where they “took her clothes off”.
“He asked me to take my top off,” the witness continued. “Then there were hands everywhere and Jeffrey proceeded to masturbate again. And Ghislaine was like rubbing on him, kissing on him.”
“During these incidents did Maxwell ever touch your body?” Assistant US Attorney Alison Moe asked.
“Yes,” Jane answered.
She also described group sex sessions taking place at Epstein’s lavish home in the mid-1990s, when she and others, including Maxwell, would “abruptly” be summoned to his bedroom or a massage room.
Her testimony goes into greater detail, and can be read here.
The theme seems to be that Ghislaine and Jefferey would single out young girls who were on hard times in one way or another, shower them in gifts and special attention, and eventually they would pounce.
Maxwell’s brother Kevin appeared in court today, a sister of hers, Isabel, has also been present for the proceedings. Ghislaine’s siblings have been supportive of her, even petitioning the United Nations to get her out on bail.
The siblings were raised in luxury, the children of publishing tycoon Robert Maxwell and his French-born wife Elisabeth, a Holocaust scholar.
The Maxwell family, including Ghislaine (top center)
The day began with the defense, Laura Menninger, grilling the first accuser and attempting to poke holes in Jane’s claims that she came from a poor, broken family when Epstein and Maxwell allegedly began preying on her in 1994.
Jane, in yesterday’s testimony, claimed that her family fell into bankruptcy after her dad died of leukemia and that she lived in a pool house with her mom and siblings at the time she was drawn in by Maxwell and Epstein.
Defense attorney Menninger challenged Jane over her testimony from the day prior regarding the first time she saw Maxwell without her clothes on.
The alleged victim said that — shortly after she was first abused by Jeffrey Epstein at the age of 14 — he and Maxwell led her to his bedroom inside his Palm Beach mansion, moved her over to the bed and “took their clothes off.”
When questioning Jane this morning, Menninger said that in Dec. 2019 “you told the government that you do not have a specific memory of your first time with Ghislaine.”
“You have come up with that memory in the last two years, correct?” she asked.
“I don’t believe I’ve come up with a memory, no,” the witness answered.
During the cross examination, Jane said that Jeffrey Epstein took her to Mar-a-Lago in the ’90s when she was a teenager to meet Donald Trump.
The woman, identified by the pseudonym “Jane,” said Epstein drove her to Trump’s Palm Beach estate in a dark green car when she was 14 in 1994.
She wasn’t asked to describe the meeting, and defense attorney Laura Menninger then moved on to an unrelated line of questioning.
Jane then mentioned another big name: Prince Andrew.
testified today that she remembered Prince Andrew being on flights with her.
The Duke of York has been under fire for his close ties to the late pedophile and is also facing a lawsuit from Virginia Roberts Giuffre, who claims Epstein and Maxwell made her have sex with the UK royal three times, starting in 2001 when she was 17.
It is important to note that Giuffre’s claims are not part of Maxwell’s ongoing federal sex-trafficking trial.
Many devout supporters were surprised when former president Donald Trump appeared to have let Biden take office. But strategically it’s starting to make a lot more sense that he and his team have allowed this to play out. In fact, this was part of a contingency plan, put into action by Trump during the pandemic, and this makes the phrase “nothing can stop what’s coming” make a lot more sense.
It would seem, under the guise of a Biden administration, Team Trump wanted everything to return to normal. Within days the Coronavirus numbers miraculously started to decline.
Numbers cross-referenced and checked against CSSE and John Hopkins University.
Art of War master, Trump, is well aware of the fact that false friends and allies surround you when you seem to have power and prestige. But it’s when you seemingly lose everything that these false friends reveal who they truly are.
Take a listen to this clip:
If you’ve been a long time readers of this site you are aware of the schism that has allegedly taken place within the military leadership, as well as the intelligence community, between those who are beholden to an international, criminal Deep-State that has permeated many governments of the world, and patriots of all nations who wish to take their respective countries back from said Deep-State and it’s Central Banking overlords.
The patriots and constitutional loyalists in government and the military were “prepared to do the unthinkable” if Hillary Clinton won the 2016 election.
This is what the infamous military insider told us back on November 2nd, 2017, drop 32.
Instead, Trump took office and the Deep State’s 16-year plan to destroy America was dashed to pieces. The Deep State wasn’t going to give up, despite 3 years of fighting Trump with everything they had.
In 2020, COVID arrived in the nick of time to override a Trump presidency with fear and sensationalism. But unbeknownst to many, the patriots used this as the perfect cover to spring their trap on the Deep State.
It seems like all was lost when Biden—appeared—to take office. Or was it? What better way to disarm the invisible enemy than to make them think they got away with the steal.
The subsequent fast track to undo everything the Trump administration fought for with every one of Biden’s over 50 Executive Orders emboldened the Deep State.
But while all the promises of our military insider seemed to evaporate, the white hats were practicing the Sun-Tzu strategy of the century—to appear weak instead of strong.
What you’re about to read might be the most compelling proof for “the plan” yet.
(Hat tip to Dave from X22 Report and BrunoBarking for tipping us off to this story.)
A Military Plan to Literally Prevent Thieving Biden From Taking Office?
Recall that the US is still technically in a state of emergency. This changes the legal and civil landscape considerably.
For instance, without an emergency, lockdowns and mask mandates are impossible, as these violate the rights of US citizens. But with an emergency, the state can order all manner of things, justified under the motivation to protect the people.
This is where it gets interesting.
Did you know that there are currently 3 of 7 contingency plans all occurring simultaneously: Projects OCTAGON, FREEJACK, and ZODIAC? Until very recently, these contingency plans have flown under the radar despite an article last year in Newsweek that made the world aware of their existence.
According to new documents and interviews with military experts, the various plans – codenamed Octagon, Freejack and Zodiac – are the underground laws to ensure government continuity. They are so secret that under these extraordinary plans, “devolution” could circumvent the normal Constitutional provisions for government succession, and military commanders could be placed in control around America.
The military has their orders, as per these plans, which include the above-mentioned operations. And they seem to have been in place for at least a year now.
The question is: are these orders coming from Trump since the plans were developed when he was in office? The key point is the fact Biden stole the 2020 election, with the help of China (see Absolute Proof Documentary).
What happened was: Deep State actors, with the help of China, helped to orchestrate “the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics”—Biden’s own words from October 24th, 2020.
👀👀
Joe Biden brags about having “the most extensive and inclusive VOTER FRAUD organization in the history of American politics” pic.twitter.com/PfkqrFXu7i
Wouldn’t this constitute a situation where “devolution” circumvent[ed] the normal Constitutional provisions for government succession?” And therefore, since Biden stole the election with the help of foreign actors, the plan would call for “military commanders [to] be placed in control around America.”
Is this why, according to Politico, the “Pentagon blocked members of President Joe Biden’s incoming administration from gaining access to critical information about current operations”?
Is this why Biden hasn’t been flying in the same Air Force One plane as Trump, as reported by Reuters?
Is this why Trump didn’t hand off the nuclear codes to Biden on inauguration day, as reported by NBC News?
Take that in for a moment.
Do you see why this might prove Trump and the military are secretly still in control of the US government? And that this could explain why the Deep State tried and failed, to impeach Trump?
Within the “Digital Soldier” community there is some thought that these contingency plans, coupled with all the facts just mentioned, could be part of a long-awaited plan to save the Republic.
The Silent Military Coup
The contingency plans were put into place under the guise of the Coronavirus Pandemic. Strategically, it makes sense that the virus would be a great cover, turning a disadvantage into an advantage.
Why?
Because an emergency situation comes with the assumption that the regular flow and order of things changes. And this gives the patriots the power to prepare for, and implement, the sweeping plans required to save the Republic. It would allow the patriots in the military to retain power, orchestrate a silent military coup, and make Biden and his Deep State cohorts believe they had won—all while Trump remains the true president of the United States.
To work, Trump would have to remain quiet—he would have to go along with the deception.
To work, most of the lower levels of government would have to believe Biden took office.
To work, the media and the people, even the patriots who discovered the plan from the military insider Q would have to all believe that Trump gave up.
Did it work? By all accounts it did.
Consider the situation and Burma as a case study in how a lawful military coup to overthrow corrupt actors might look.
The big difference is that, instead of an overt coup, the coup here is silent. But the Deep State would know the truth, and they’d know what was happening. And knowing this, they’d foolishly try to impeach Trump knowing he was still technically POTUS.
Does their desperate attempt to impeach him—while all the world believes he’s a citizen—now make more sense?
Above-Top Secret contingency plans already exist for what the military is supposed to do if all the Constitutional successors are incapacitated. Standby orders were issued more than three weeks ago to ready these plans, not just to protect Washington but also to prepare for the possibility of some form of martial law.
“We’re in new territory,” says one senior officer, the entire post-9/11 paradigm of emergency planning thrown out the window. The officer jokes, in the kind of morbid humor characteristic of this slow-moving disaster, that America had better learn who Gen. Terrence J. O’Shaughnessy is.
He is the “combatant commander” for the United States and would in theory be in charge if Washington were eviscerated. That is, until a new civilian leader could be installed.
‘We’re in territory we’ve never been in before’
Though it may all sound horrifying to folks who hang on the words of their preferred corporate news pundits, temporary marshal law may actually be America’s saving grace.
Review what Justin shared in the following video. When an office holder breaks their oath and ceases to uphold their lawful mandate, the office they occupy is lawfully vacant. This makes the government defunct—it ceases to exist. The fraud was exposed and SCOTUS, Congress, and the States failed to do their duty and investigate the fraud—violating their oaths of office. This means the only parts of the government that are lawfully left are those offices that upheld their oath—Trump and the military.
When might the military’s “emergency authority” be needed?
Traditionally, it’s after a nuclear device goes off in an American city. But now, planners are looking at the military response to urban violence [ANTIFA, Color Revolution] as people seek protection and fight over food.
According to one senior officer, the contingency would trigger if the complete evacuation of Washington took place.
Under Defense Department regulations, military commanders are authorized to take action on their own—in extraordinary circumstances—where “duly constituted local authorities are unable to control the situation.” The conditions include “large-scale, unexpected civil disturbances” involving “significant loss of life or wanton destruction of property.” The Joint Chiefs of Staff codified these rules in October 2018, reminding commanders that they could decide, on their own authority, to “engage temporarily” in military control in circumstances “where prior authorization by the President is impossible” or where local authorities “are unable to control the situation.” A new Trump-era Pentagon directive calls it “extreme situations.” In all cases, even where a military commander declares martial law, the directives say that civil rule has to be restored as soon as possible.
“In scenarios where one city or one region is devastated, that’s a pretty straightforward process,” the military planner told me. “But with coronavirus, where the effect is nationwide, we’re in territory we’ve never been in before.”
In recognition of the equal vulnerability of military forces, the Pentagon has instituted unprecedented restrictions on off-base travel. Last Wednesday it restricted most overseas travel for 60 days, and then on Friday issued supplemental domestic guidance that essentially keeps all uniformed personnel on or near military bases. There are exceptions, including travel that is “mission-essential,” the Pentagon says.
Mission essential in this regard applies to the maze of more than a dozen different secret assignments, most of them falling under three larger contingency plans:
CONPLAN 3400, or the military’s plan for “homeland defense,” if America itself is a battlefield.
CONPLAN 3500, “defense support of civil authorities,” where the military assists in an emergency short of armed attack on the nation.
CONPLAN 3600, military operations in the National Capital Region and continuation of government, under which the most-secret plans to support continuity are nested.
All of these plans are the responsibility of U.S. Northern Command (or NORTHCOM), the homeland defense military authority created after 9/11. Air Force General O’Shaughnessy is NORTHCOM’s Colorado Springs-based commander.
If these plans are in operation, and we’ve seen many indications that they are, at some point, the military will produce evidence of treason, sedition, election fraud.
When is a better time to do this when the military is in charge and Trump is removed from the limelight? These contingency plans provide the perfect conditions to bring forth said evidence.
Those who were prepared to “do the unthinkable” haven’t gone anywhere, those who have taken their oaths and are willing to die for the good of the country they love will never back down.
The Only Logical Explanation
The facts in hand point to one logical explanation: that Biden didn’t truly become president because the military already performed a silent coup per the contingency plans that were put in place in 2020.
This explains the irregular nature of Biden’s “presidency”, the embarrassing failure of the Deep State to impeach Trump, and the military plans OCTAGON, FREEJACK, and ZODIAC. We are now witnessing a quiet battle for the freedom of the US. If true, the question is, when will the military trigger the arrest and takedown operation, like what happened in Burma?
It’s anyone’s guess.
Now that Trump’s been acquitted for a second time, it’s reasonable to expect more bold actions on the part of 45. His rebuke of Mitch McConnel is likely just the start of much bigger movies, ones made with more teeth now that he’s just a “regular citizen.”
PS:
To avoid any disappointment, it’s important to remember that we’re using critical thinking to consider possibilities. We could be wrong. There could be other pieces to the puzzle we didn’t consider because we didn’t know. But at present, the above presentation seems to account for all the variables, and this is what determines whether or not a theory is valid and is therefore likely of being true. If we discover something we missed, we’ll post an update as we usually do. But recall that the DS media has refused to acknowledge election fraud for a good reason: they need us (the people) to believe they’ve won. That doesn’t make it any more true, and in fact, it makes the idea of a silent coup all the more plausible.
President Trump has released a statement in the wake of a recent FBI bulletin regarding alleged “armed protests” that are apparently being planned in all 50 state capitols.
The statement was released via Whitehouse.gov Wednesday afternoon:
“In light of reports of more demonstrations, I urge that there must be NO violence, NO lawbreaking and NO vandalism of any kind. That is not what I stand for, and it is not what America stands for. I call on ALL Americans to help ease tensions and calm tempers. Thank You.”
In the CNN piece, it is claimed that:
“On 8 January, the FBI received information on an identified group calling for others to join them in ‘storming’ state, local and federal government courthouses and administrative buildings in the event POTUS is removed as President prior to Inauguration Day. This identified group is also planning to ‘storm’ government offices including in the District of Columbia and in every state, regardless of whether the states certified electoral votes for Biden or Trump, on 20 January,” the bulletin adds.
The FBI is also tracking reports of “various threats to harm President-Elect Biden ahead of the presidential inauguration,” the bulletin states. “Additional reports indicate threats against VP-Elect Harris and Speaker Pelosi.”
As an independent, alternative media company with its finger on the pulse of the MAGA movement, we have a few qualms with these claims.
Firstly, if these “protests” were organic and not prep work for a future photo op to build upon the narrative that began on the 6th, then we certainly would have heard about it by now. Not a single known patriot, independent journalist, pundit, youtube personality, or “digital soldier” has mentioned this in any other light besides being blatant psychological manipulation and narrative control. Again, if these protests were actually being orchestrated by patriots, we would have heard about them by now.
Secondly, the MAGA crowd, general conservatives, and the moderates who get pigeonholed as Trump supporters for not towing the establishment line, by and large, tend to respect and want to uphold the rule of law, not desecrate it.
We make no claims as to what is absolute truth regarding this situation, only what it looks like from our subjective vantage. If anyone who reads this article is planning on attending an “Armed Protest” in the coming days we strongly suggest that you reconsider.
Wednesday evening The President put out a video statement:
“As far as I'm concerned, it's a damned shame that a field as potentially dynamic and vital as journalism should be overrun with dullards, bums, and hacks, hag-ridden with myopia, apathy, and complacence, and generally stuck in a bog of stagnant mediocrity.” -Hunter Thompson
The Underground Newswire 