Tag Archives: ssp

UNW Weekly Report Dec 8-14: Trade War, Impeachment, Disclosure

By Ryan DeLarme
December 14th, 2019

The Underground Newswire does not seek to convince or sway, rather it is our hope to indicate and suggest without violating the universal and self evident laws of free will and confusion. We’d like first and foremost to suggest that we are all, every one of us, in the midst of a quiet war fought with silent weapons. The fight is world wide, louder in some places than others (think revolutions simultaneously occurring across the globe IE: Hong Kong, France, Iran, Venezuela, ETC.) It is a psychological war, and the front lines are quite literally human hearts and minds. With these weekly reports, we hope to offer alternative perspectives and speculation coming from an amalgamation of sources involved in Media, Military, Finance, and Politics. Let’s attempt to sift the muk.

Ex-FORBES newsman gone rouge; Benjamin Fulford (Whose alleged contacts range from CIA and Vatican Officials to P2 Freemasons and Asian royalty) claims that “The Western world remains paralyzed by an elite civil war while China keeps getting stronger and stronger...” It would seem, according to Mr Fulford and his sources, that unless this civil war is ended, the Western G6 alliance (G7 minus Japan) will lose the ability to control the United Nations, essentially losing the ability to steer the direction humanity chooses for its future.

Our friends at the X22Report believe the trade war isn’t actually meant to attack China and its people, but instead is an attempt to damage the Central Bank (CB), whom China is now taking money from at an alarming rate. Trump recently tweeted that a deal with China is “Very close”, which is desirable considering, as indicators, that the swine flu epidemic has caused the price of pork and other animal proteins to more than double and that the lack of Chinese purchasing is one of the top reasons for the stall in the European Economy. 

UPDATE: China has agreed to structural changes and massive purchases of Agricultural Products, Energy, and Manufactured Goods. As of now (despite the Wall Street Journal’s publish questionable “leaks” to the contrary) the 25% Tariffs will stand, and the penalty Tariffs that were set for December 15th will no longer be charged. The talk now is that “Phase 2” negotiations will begin immediately instead of waiting for the 2020 elections. The Tariffs, by design, are bringing in billions to keep the corporation known as America afloat just a little longer while the final preparations and maneuverings to go after the FED and CB are made.

In other financial news, Boris Johnson won his election against Jeremy Corbyn and is now poised to push Brexit forward in January. If he is successful we might see a new trade deal between Britain and the US, one that would essentially be leaving the EU in the cold. The landslide victory has folks like Christopher Steel and Hillary Clinton predictably claiming that Boris Johnson is a “Russian Agent” and that Britain needs its own Mueller style Investigation. This is a clear indicator that BJ is an enemy of the Central bank system and the old guard. 

The IG hearing was haphazardly broadcast by a mainstream media who not only cut away from Lindsey Graham’s opening statement and conveniently resumed coverage as Diane Feinstein made her statement, but omitted most of the Horowitz testimony that didn’t shine too brightly on the alleged “Deep State” actors. Now, when it comes to the Impeachment drama not a single second is omitted, which is a perfect example of the bias occurring and a good explanation to why ratings are continuing to plummet in favor of more comprehensive, civilian and alternative news sources.  

Jim Jordan tried to strike Article 1 from the Articles of Impeachment, which claimed “Abuse of Power”, saying that the evidence provided does not support the claim. It was found that there was no quid pro quo, no extortion, and Zelinski phone transcripts were even released, but the house Judiciary committee rejected Jordan’s proposal with a vote of 23-17 in favor of the Mainstream narrative and the suspicious and poorly constructed Adam Schiff phone call gambit. Adam Schiff may have the ability to will his eyeballs out of socket but he should try and stay clear of writing fan fiction and dialogue for kabuki theater. 

The FISA report is now out, and it lays out the players, what they did, how they did it, and referred individuals to the department of Justice to be brought up on criminal charges. As predicted those implicated and those who have the most to lose are lashing out. Eric Holder wrote an op-ed about how the current AG William Barr is “unfit” for the job. We’ve been told for some time that Barr was the designated person to handle the arrests when the time comes, doing the actual investigation and causing folks like Hillary Clinton, Adam Schiff etc. to panic, so their attacks against him could potentially be seen to confirm this theory. 

US attorney John Durham, Attorney General William Barr, and Special prosecutor John Huber in conjunction with Inspector General Horowitz, are supposed to be the “white hat” dream team tasked with the take-down of the “Deep State”. We will have to wait and see if this is true or just propaganda.

The Impeachment drama continues to unfold as predicted, yesterday the House Judiciary voted “Yes” on impeachment, next it will be going to a full house vote and we will have to see from there. Now, consider what might happen when this goes to the Senate. Not only will it not pass the Senate but the whole thing will likely be exposed picked to pieces on a public stage and the Mainstream will have no choice but to air it all or suffer further losses. In fact, some have claimed that the Senate was always the key, the strategy, the target. If taken to the senate the whole thing will “boomerang” back on those pushing to oust a duly elected president. It has been noted that not all Democrats are unified on the impeachment vote but may be pushed by bad actors using intimidation and black mail, basically business as usual. 

Now let’s talk about high profile resignations (which have been occurring at an unprecedented rate since 2017, coincidence?). This week we have Steve Burke, CEO of NBC/Universal added to the list. We also have CNN producer Steve Brusk resigning after the Project Veritas’ video surfaced where he was accused of misconduct. Other notable resignations this week include: Kate Spade CEO Anna Bakst,  Assistant Secretary of Defense Randall Schriver, Toyota Motor North America Inc. CEO Jim Lentz, The Institute of Cancer Research London CEO Paul Workman, Deputy Foreign Minister of Greece Antonis Diamataris, D-Wave Systems Inc. CEO Vern Brownell (to be replaced by Alan Baratz), and Edward O’Callaghan from the US department of Justice who worked closely with Rod Rosentein to oversee the Russian Investigation sham. These are just a few of the bigger names and positions, a more complete list can be viewed here.

  Lastly, I’d like to touch on a topic that is near and dear to my heart: Classified technology from black budget projects. One of the main reasons we started this outfit was to lay out a trail of information inevitably leading to the existence of technology (some alleged, some confirmed) that could literally change the shape of society over night. The kind of tech that could, say, fix the oceans and the atmosphere, provide power and clean water on a global scale, etc.

These kinds of technologies are kept under wraps for a myriad of reasons. For example; how can you extort billions from a willing population without the eternal fear of Cancer and Climate Change being violently shoved down their throats for ages despite continuously emergent yet censored evidence to the contrary? Also, some of these technologies would render the whole petrodollar system useless, essentially causing mass chaos if not handled strategically, and that may in fact be what is happening.

Last week, during a panel at the Reagan National Defense Forum, US Airforce Secretary Barbara Barret and Mike Rogers; a key member of Congress (Al), agreed that “Declassifying some of what is currently held in secure vaults would be a good idea,” following up the statement by saying “You would have to be careful about what we declassify, but there is much more classified than what needs to be.” To the layman this statement may seem like it’s not all that shocking, but to those who have researched the exceptionally shady subject of secret space programs know that even mentioning the existence of “Secretive space programs” from officials at this level is a HUGE deal.

When it comes to the subject of Declassifying these SSP’s and their associated technologies, there tends to be roughly three schools of thought with their own personal agendas: there are those who are staunchly against Declassification (think global elites, most of the 1%) who are concerned that disclosure would inevitably lead to the exposing of generational crimes against humanity, there are those who would prefer a slower, drip-drip style disclosure (think To the Stars Academy, Steven Greer, MIC Think Tanks, MUFON, etc.), and the full disclosure crowd who want to “rip the band-aid off” in hopes of getting this tech out to the people and put into use cleaning up the environment and enriching the downtrodden as soon as possible.

 Let’s take a closer look at Barbara Barrett. She is a former chair of a big defense contractor called The Aerospace Corporation, and has sat on the boards of the California Institute of Technology, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, RAND Corporation (seriously?!), Smithsonian Institution, Horatio Alger Association of Distinguished Americans, and Lasker Foundation… basically, if anyone is going to have an idea of what exists in those “black vaults” it is somebody with a resume like Barbara Barrett.

Needless to say, we will be following this closely in conjunction with news on the newly established Space Force (which many believe will be an outlet for the declassification of certain aircraft and technology).

Wikileaks Document Exposes a “Secret US Base on the Moon”

Originally Published at Collective Evolution
by Arjun Walia, April 15th, 2019

  • The Facts: A document published by Wikileaks clearly implies that the United States had a “secret” base on the Moon that was destroyed by Russia. It’s one of many interesting documents that suggest strange things are and have been happening on the Moon.
  • Reflect On: Is our world really as it’s been presented? There are millions of pages of documents that are classified by multiple countries every single year, how is it possible to really determine what’s going on behind the scenes? Why does secrecy rule?

“The Assange arrest is scandalous in several respects, and one of them is the effort of governments, and it’s not just the US government… The efforts to silence a journalist who was producing materials that people in power didn’t want the rascal multitude to know about… That’s basically what happened. Wikileaks was producing things that people ought to know about those in power, people in power don’t like that. So therefore we have to silence it”
. – Noam Chomsky (source)

*Note from author: I recently published anarticle that goes into detail about what Julian Assange’s arrest tells us about our world.

The idea that something strange may be happening on the Moon is not far fetched at all. In fact, given all of the information that’s now available within the public domain on the subject, it’s hard to see how it’s not a fact. We’ll get to some of that information later in this article; but first, let’s draw our attention to a strange Wikileaks document titled, “Report That UR Destroyed Secret Moon Base.”

Unfortunately, the document is not an electronic document, therefore access to its full contents is not available online. For anybody truly interested in reading the entire thing, a Freedom of Information Act Request (FOIA) may be in order.

Without speculating here, we can conclude that this is what it says it is, a report regarding possible space wars that are taking place in the classified world. The document title alone not only exposes the reality of these alleged wars, but the possibility of a “Secret Moon Base” belonging to the United States that apparently was in operation until it was destroyed by “UR.” (Soviet Union)

You can view it in the Wikileaks archive here.

So, what other information exists, besides this document, showing that something strange is and has been happening on the Moon? There’s a lot of information, so it’s hard to know where to begin.

First of all, the idea of bases on the Moon have been an open discussion within the government for a long time, although the information isn’t easy to find, but it’s definitely out there. A document from the government’s own publishing office is a great example. It clearly shows one of the goals of the United States government is to build a base on the Moon, and this is as far back as 1966. (source)

A portion of the document reads, with reference to presidents Kennedy and Johnson in a statement by HON. George P. Miller:

I also believe that we can and will achieve the goal set by Presidents Kennedy and Johnson: a manned landing on the moon before 1970. My own confidence in our rapidly advancing science and technology is such that I can visualize many more dramatic achievements ahead, although I will fix no timetable for them. 1. The exploration of the lunar surface, and possibly the establishment of one or more permanent bases there.

Furthermore, decades old documents have been declassified discussing this topic, showing just how serious and far possible advancements with these intentions have gone.

Take a look at the screen shot below, taken from the CIA electronic reading room in the form of a memorandum that was addressed to the CIA director regarding “Military Thought (Top Secret)” by Lieutenant General Korenevskiy.

The document above really goes into detail regarding the importance of weaponizing space. This brings to mind another document from Wikileaks, in the form of an email that was sent to politician John Podesta from Dr. Edgar Mitchell, Apollo 14 astronaut, and Dr. Carol Rosin. It reads as follows:

Dear John, Because the War in Space race is heating up, I felt you should be aware of several factors as you and I schedule our Skype talk. Remember, our nonviolent ETI from the contiguous universe are helping us bring zero point energy to Earth. They will not tolerate any forms of military violence on Earth or in space. The following information in italics was shared with me by my colleague Carol Rosin, who worked closely for several years with Wernher von Braun before his death. Carol and I have worked on the Treaty on the Prevention of the Placement of Weapons in Outer Space, attached for your convenience.

A declassified report by the Air Force Nuclear Weapons Center from June 1959 shows just how seriously they considered a plan called Project A119. In general, they wanted to investigate the capability of weapons in space as well as gain further insight into the space environment and the detonation of nuclear devices within it.

Interesting to say the least, but it’s important to recognize the intentions behind the letter, and that is the recognition that humans have brought and will continue to bring their destructive ways into space by weaponizing it or attempting to weaponize it.

With all of this documentation, it’s also interesting to look into witness testimonies from credible sources.

In the 1950s, Colonel Ross Dedrickson was responsible for maintaining the inventory of the nuclear weapon stockpile for the AEC, and for accompanying security teams testing the security of the weapons, among many other duties. When it comes to weaponizing space, which is clearly outlined within multiple documents linked above, this is what he had to say:

“I also learned about incidents involving nuclear weapons, and among these incidents were a couple of nuclear weapons sent into space that were destroyed by the extraterrestrials… At the very end of the 70s and the early 80s, we attempted to put a nuclear weapon on the Moon and explode it for scientific measurements and other things, which was not acceptable to the extraterrestrials. They destroyed the weapon before it got to the Moon.” (source)

Dedrickson is one of hundreds of whistleblowers with verified, credible and impressive backgrounds to speak up about an extraterrestrial presence. In that same interview, he went on to state that:

A spacecraft went to the rescue of Apollo 13, and they accompanied Apollo 13 on their voyage around the Moon back to Earth. And on two occasions they thought they might have to transfer the crew to their spacecraft, but they saw them safely back to Earth.

This may explain why several astronauts have also been quite outspoken about an extraterrestrial presence, like Edgar Mitchell, Brian O’Leary, Story Musgrave, Gordon Cooper and many others.

Another document from 1965 regarding the CIA keeping tabs on Soviet space plans reads as follows:

Keep in mind, this was more than 50 years ago.

Below is an interesting quote from Carl Sagan:

It is not out of the question that artifacts of these visits still exist, or even that some kind of base is maintained (possibly automatically) within the solar system to provide continuity for successive expeditions. Because of weathering and the possibility of detection and interference by the inhabitants of the Earth, it would be preferable not to erect such a base on the Earth’s surface. The Moon seems one reasonable alternative. Forthcoming high resolution photographic reconnaissance of the Moon from space vehicles – particularly of the back side – might bear these possibilities in mind. (source)

George Leonard’s 1976 book, Somebody Else is on the Moon, and Fred Steckling’s 1981 book, We Discovered Alien Bases on The Moon, also come to mind when discussing this subject.

Members of the Society For Planetary SETI Research (SPSR) recently published a paper in the Journal of Space Exploration about certain features on the far side of the Moon that appear in the crater Paracelsus C. Titled “Image Analysis of Unusual Structures on the Far Side of the Moon in the Crater Paracelsus C,” it argues that these features might be artificial in origin.

The study makes a great point when it comes to the extraterrestrial hypothesis:

A decidedly conservative mainstream scientific establishment often rejects anomalies based on subject matter alone, i.e., there cannot be alien artifacts on the moon because there are no alien artifacts on the moon (or other planets). Such a view is an example of circular reasoning, based on the belief that extraterrestrials do not exist, or if they do exist that they could not have traveled to our solar system.

The truth is, “there is abundant evidence that we are being contacted, that civilizations have been visiting us for a very long time.” – Dr. Brian O’Leary, former NASA astronaut and Princeton Physics Professor (source)

When it comes to the Moon, man-made bases may not be the only ones there.

As far as our own bases are concerned, Karl Wolfe, who was a precision electronics photograph technician at Langley Air Force Base, became well-known when he provided his testimony at National Press Club in Washington, D.C. as part of Dr. Steven Greer’s disclosure project.(source)

Wolfe’s testimony revealed that he was taken into a dark room where images from NASA’s Lunar Orbiter were being developed and stitched together into composite images called “mosaics.”

“They were doing 35 mm strips of film at the time which were then assembled into 18 ½ x 11 mosaics. Those strips were from successive passes around the Moon and they would build up a photograph ,” Wolfe said.(source)

“We walked over to one side of the lab and he said, ‘By the way, we’ve discovered a base on the backside of the moon.’”

Dr. John Brandenburg, the Deputy Manager of the Clementine Mission to the Moon, which was part of a joint space project between the Ballistic Missile Defence Organization (BMDO) and NASA, has also made some fascinating revelations. The mission discovered water at the Moon’s poles in 1994 (Source: page 16 of 18)(source)(source). But, according to Dr. Brandenburg, the Clementine Mission had an ulterior agenda:

“The Clementine Mission was a photo reconnaissance mission basically to check out if someone was building bases on the Moon that we didn’t know about. Were they expanding them?… Of all the pictures I’ve seen from the Moon that show possible structures, the most impressive is a picture of a miles-wide recto-linear structure. This looked unmistakably artificial, and it shouldn’t be there. As somebody in the space defence community, I look on any such structure on the Moon with great concern because it isn’t ours, there’s no way we could have built such a thing. It means someone else is up there.” (Quote from the documentary, “Aliens on the Moon.”)

Related Articles

There are other strange facts about our Moon that’ve been pointed out by some very credible sources. I go into more detail regarding the actual structure of the Moon and what it is as well as the evidence suggesting it could be artificially made in the article linked below:

Multiple Scientists Publish Papers Suggesting The Moon Is Hollow & Artificially Made

Welcome To The World of Secrecy

A Michigan State University economist teamed up with multiple researchers, including Catherine Austin Fitts, former assistant secretary of Housing and Urban Development. They found trillions of unaccounted for dollars missing from housing & D.O.D and going towards black budget programs. You can read more about that here.

We are talking about Special Access Programs (SAP). We have unacknowledged and waived SAPs. These programs do not exist publicly, but they do indeed exist. They are better known as ‘deep black programs.’ A 1997 US Senate report described them as “so sensitive that they are exempt from standard reporting requirements to the Congress.” (source)

I am mentioning this stuff because, whatever is happening with regards to the Moon, you can bet that it’s being funded by trillions of dollars from within these deep black budget programs. These are our tax dollars hard at work.

We don’t really hear about black budget programs, or about people who have actually looked into them.  However, the topic was discussed in 2010 by Washington Post journalists Dana Priest and William Arkin. Their investigation lasted approximately two years and concluded that America’s classified world has:

Become so large, so unwieldy and so secretive that no one knows how much money it costs, how many people it employs, how many programs exist within it or exactly how many agencies do the same work. (source)

CE founder Joe Martino recently went deep into this subject on an episode of CETV, it will be airing soon!

The Takeaway

Our world is not how it’s been presented. Many subjects once and that still are deemed as a “conspiracy” are clearly not a conspiracy. Strange things happening on the moon and UFOs, for example, are one of several great examples.

It’s OK to explore these things, but it’s vital that we examine good sources and present good sources when we do so.

About the Author

Arjun Walia

I joined the CE team in 2010 shortly after finishing university and have been grateful for the fact that I have been able to do this ever since 🙂 There are many things happening on the planet that don’t resonate with me, and I wanted to do what I could to play a role in creating change. It’s been great making changes in my own life and creating awareness and I look forward to more projects that move beyond awareness and into action and implementation. So stay tuned 🙂 arjun@collective-evolution.com