Tag Archives: Myocarditis

Vaccine-Injuries SKYROCKET: Two Months into 2022, Vaccine-Related Myocarditis Reports in VAERS Have Surged to Nearly Half the Total Reported in 2021

Julian Conradson
March 11th, 2022

For several months, the US public health regime and the bootlicking media have been routinely downplaying the risk of developing myocarditis after taking the vaccine, calling the occurrence “mild” and “rare,” and systematically burying any evidence to the contrary.

However, myocarditis – a potentially life-threatening inflammation of the heart –  is in no way a ‘mild’ adverse reaction to the vaccine – especially when 90% of cases that have been recorded in VAERS ended up hospitalized – so, in other words, that half of the narrative was just an outright lie.

And as for the claim that the condition is ‘rare,’ that was seemingly also completely false. Cases of myocarditis have exploded in the US since the rollout of the experimental vaccine, even in populations that aren’t normally as likely to develop the condition, like children and young adults.

What’s worse – the pace at which otherwise healthy Americans are developing the life-threatening heart condition is speeding up.

According to the most recent Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) data, the number of myocarditis and pericarditis reports in the first two months of 2022 is already almost half as many as the total number of submissions in 2021.

Daniel Horowitz from The Blaze breaks down the VAERS numbers:

“We are over a year into the known safety signals of this vaccine for myocarditis, and yet the shots still have not been pulled, even for younger males. In fact, it’s still a requirement in many colleges.

Yet reports of myocarditis and pericarditis are so prevalent now that just in the first eight weeks of 2022, we’re already at 47% of the total VAERS submissions for 2021. There were 24,177 reports of pericarditis/myocarditis submitted to VAERS in 2021. In 2022, just through Feb. 25, there were 11,289 reports, which is nearly half of last year’s total.”

Take a look:

If the numbers continue to hold at this pace, there will be a whopping three times more vaccine-related myocarditis cases than there were last year – and that would just be within VAERS, which is notoriously underreported.

When dissected further, the new data reveals some alarming trends. The problem is getting exponentially worse, and, most concerningly, teenagers and young adults are experiencing the worst of it.

Also, the condition most commonly develops after a second dose of the vaccine, no matter the age group.

From Horowitz:

“It’s not acceptable (and never was) for the media and the pharma-paid ‘fact checkers’ to automatically dismiss VAERS. It is our main pharmaco-surveillance tool and was put in place precisely to serve as the consolation to the public for Congress absolving vaccine manufactures of liability. Also, the data complements what we’ve learned universally from all the myocarditis vaccine studies – that it targets teens and early 20s more than other age groups and is more potent after the second dose.

The CDC’s own researchers published a study in JAMA in which they clinically confirmed most of the myocarditis submissions to VAERS. As such, they concluded, ‘Given the high verification rate of reports of myocarditis to VAERS after mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccination, underreporting is more likely. Therefore, the actual rates of myocarditis per million doses of vaccine are likely higher than estimated.’”

Here is a chart from VAERS showing the breakdown of myocarditis cases by age and number of doses – 17 and 18 year olds have the highest rate, especially after the second dose:

The damages from this vaccine will linger for years to come, with countless Americans needlessly suffering from severe injury or death caused by the experimental jab. In addition to the myocarditis cases, there have also been over 20,000 deaths and over a million adverse events logged into VAERS since the beginning of the pandemic – which is an astounding number for any vaccine. In the past, vaccines would be pulled if they caused double-digit deaths, let alone tens of thousands.

In short, the mRNA Covid vaccine is by far the most dangerous vaccine ever recorded in VAERS, especially considering the still-unknown long-term effects, but Biden and the rest of the tyrants have been pushing everyone, including very young children, to take not one – not two – but three vaccines – with a fourth jab coming right around the corner.

Oh, and they are testing the vaccine on toddlers and infants as we speak so they can become eligible for the vaccine.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/11/final-frontier-moderna-begins-testing-experimental-covid-jab-infants-young-6-months-old/embed/#?secret=HXS40OsTRD

Keep in mind, this virus has a 99.95-99.99% recovery rate – and with children and young people, it’s even higher. So forcing this experimental jab on them is completely criminal and pure evil.

For several months now, actual experts like Robert Malone – the inventor of mRNA vaccine technology – and Dr. Peter McCullough – the most published and cited cardiologist in the world – have been warning about the “reprehensible and reckless” conduct by US public health officials with the experimental Covid-19 Vaccines – especially the recent decision to approve the jab for young children.

According to McCullough, who cites several studies to back his claims, Vaccine Induced Myocarditis is a rapidly growing problem that has become at least 50% more common than originally predicted by the US public health ‘experts.’ The condition has become so prevalent, he says, that children aged 12 to 17 are actually “more likely to be hospitalized with Myocarditis” after taking the vaccine than the virus itself.

Researchers Examine Autopsies of Two Boys Who Died Days After COVID Vaccine

ARJUN WALIA
MARCH 7th, 2022

Three pathologists have published a piece in the journal, Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine regarding their examination of autopsies conducted of two teenage boys who died days after receiving Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine. According to the three pathologists, two of whom are medical examiners, ”The myocardial injury seen in these post-vaccine hearts is different from typical myocarditis.”

These were healthy children, with no evidence of active or previous COVID-19 infection. They also had toxicology screens showing no poisons or drugs present in their bodies.

Instead of observations seen with normal myocarditis injury, the authors explain the injury as “closely resembling a catecholamine-mediated stress (toxic) cardiomyopathy.”

“The microscopic findings are not the alterations seen with typical myocarditis. This suggest a role for cytokine storm which may occur with an excessive inflammatory response.”

Autopsy Histopathologic Cardiac Findings in Two Adolescents Following the Second COVID-19 Vaccine Dose

The idea that these injuries could be a result of a natural COVID infection was thus ruled out. They explain that “there are areas of contraction bands and hypereosinophilic myocytes distinct from the inflammation that’s seen with typical myocarditis.”

The type of injuries these two boys suffered is also called ‘neurogenic myocardial injury’ or ‘broken heart syndrome.’

“This injury pattern is instead similar to what is seen in the myocardium of patients who are clinically diagnosed with Takotsubo, toxic, or ‘stress’ cardiomyopathy, which is a temporary myocardial injury that can develop in patients with extreme physical, chemical, or sometimes emotional stressors.”

Autopsy Histopathologic Cardiac Findings in Two Adolescents Following the Second COVID-19 Vaccine Dose

Their injuries were a result of a reaction to something, in this case it seems pretty clear that these deaths were vaccine-induced.

“This post-vaccine reaction may represent an overly exuberant immune response and the myocardial injury is mediated by similar immune mechanisms as described with SARS-COV-2 and multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS-C) cytokine storms.”

Autopsy Histopathologic Cardiac Findings in Two Adolescents Following the Second COVID-19 Vaccine Dose

The next question is, are these types of injuries really as rare as federal health regulatory agencies claim? The citizenry has been assured that the risks of serious adverse reactions to COVID vaccines are far less than the risk of serious reactions to COVID itself. But is this true for children? Multiple countries have reported zero COVID deaths in children throughout this pandemic, like Germany and Sweden for example. Others have reported similar numbers on par with the flu, and the survival rate for children has been estimated to be nearly 100 percent.

These are a few of many reasons why some countries, like Norway, do not recommend these vaccines for children.

Furthermore, how effective can a vaccine be for children if their survival rate is already so high, and their chances of hospitalization so low? The effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine against Omicron “declined rapidly for children, particularly those 5-11 years,” according to a study released Feb 28, 2022. It was found to be only 12 percent effective.

A 2021 study out of the University of California used VAERS to show the risk of myocarditis for teenage boys in the 12-15 age group is at least six times greater after two doses of the Pfizer vaccine than being hospitalized for COVID. Another one published in Nature Medicine suggested the same.

Has an appropriate cost/benefit analysis been done with regards to the rare risk of vaccine injury compared to the rare risk of injury from a COVID infection for children?

There are multiple reports of serious reactions to COVID vaccines that have been reported in the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS). This includes approximately 24,000 deaths ad 44,000 permanent disabilities since their rollout. But the CDC continues to assure the public that “Reports of adverse events to VAERS following vaccination, including deaths, do not necessarily mean that a vaccine caused a health problem.”

Well, do they (the vaccine injury reports) or don’t they cause health problems? Are they properly looked into or not? How can we determine if vaccine injury reports did or didn’t and are appropriate measures being taken by these federal health regulatory agencies to dive in deeper into these cases?

Approximately 50 percent of vaccine injuries reported to VAERS in the last 30 years are all from COVID vaccines. Furthermore, anecdotal evidence of people sharing what they perceive to be their COVID vaccine-induced injuries has exploded on social media. There are multiple examples, Jab Injuries Australia is one of them, Jab Injuries Canada is another.

A Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request made by the Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency group has revealed that Pfizer was aware of 1,223 possible vaccine-related deaths and more than 50,000 serious adverse within the first 90 days of their COVID vaccine rollout.

Below are a few examples of reports submitted to VAERS in context with the autopsy examination analyzed in this article.

A recent death involved a 12-year-old girl (VAERS I.D. 1784945) who died from a respiratory tract hemorrhage 22 days after receiving her first Pfizer product dose. Another recent death is the case of a 16-year-old girl (VAERS I.D. 1694568) who died of pulmonary embolism 9 days after a Pfizer product dose (whether it was the first or second is unknown).

Yet another recent death was that of a 15-year-old boy who died six days after receiving his first dose of Pfizer product. The VAERS report (I.D. 1764974) states that the previously healthy teen ‘was in his usual state of good health. Five days after the vaccine, he complained of shoulder pain. He was playing with 2 friends at a community pond, swinging from a rope swing, flipping in the air, and landing in the water feet first. He surfaced, laughed, told his friends “Wow, that hurt!”, then swam towards the shore, underwater as was his usual routine. The friends became worried when he did not reemerge.

His body was retrieved by local authorities more than an hour later.’ The autopsy revealed ‘small foci of myocardial inflammation, an adverse effect of these COVID products commonly found among children and youth, particularly young men.

People, journalists, doctors and scientists who have brought up vaccine safety and efficacy concerns throughout this pandemic have been censored, vilified and labeled as “conspiracy theorists” by governments and legacy media.

That’s not a good look for inspiring confidence in COVID vaccines. What would be more effective would simply be an open discussion, and addressing these concerns that have been brought up. They continue to remain unacknowledged within the mainstream and therefore those who rely on legacy media sources for information remain completely unaware.

CDC Releases International Data on Risk of Myocarditis Caused by mRNA Covid-19 Vaccines

Jim Hoft
March 2nd, 2022

In a new update published on the CDC website on February 22nd, scientists say prolonging the interval between the first and second dose from six to eight weeks “may mitigate the risk of myocarditis/pericarditis and improve vaccine effectiveness.”

The CDC said the relative risk for myocarditis caused by mRNA vaccine is higher in young males ages 12 to 39 years old.

According to the update,  a 3 or 4-week interval continues to be the recommended interval for people who are moderately to severely immunocompromised, adults ages 65 years and older, and others who need rapid protection due to increased concern about community transmission or risk of severe disease.

Extending the interval between the first and second doses might reduce myocarditis risk.

CDC released a new study examining international data and policies on preferential recommendations of an mRNA vaccine product or extended primary series intervals as they relate to myocarditis and/or pericarditis. Below is the summary of findings in each country.

USA: Summary of Findings

Canada: Summary of findings

United Kingdom: Summary of findings

Nordic Countries: Nordic cohort, myocarditis results

Denmark: SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and myocarditis or myopericarditis: population-based cohort study

France and Germany: Summary of findings

According to the summary of findings, the risk of myocarditis may be higher for Moderna than the Pfizer vaccine.

The study concluded that myocarditis and pericarditis may be associated with Moderna vs. Pfizer especially in males aged 18-29 years old and also with shorter primary series intervals.

After billions of their test vaccines were given only now they are saying to extend the interval between shots or you could face myocarditis.
It’s a little too late for that now.

You can read the full report here.