Tag Archives: Geopolitics

Biden, Geopolitics, Ukraine

Zelenskyy Calls for Biden to Visit Ukraine: ‘He Should Come Here’ (VIDEO)

Cassandra Fairbanks
Published April 17, 2022

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is calling for Joe Biden to visit Ukraine.

The comment came during the same interview with CNN’s Jake Tapper, during which Zelenskyy said that “all of the countries of the world” should begin preparing for nuclear war with Russia.

“Do you want President Biden to come here?” Tapper asked.

“Yes,” Zelenskyy replied in English.

Zelenskyy said that he doesn’t just want it to happen, but believes that it will.

“Are there any plans for him to come?” Tapper asked.

“I think he will,” Zelensky said.

“You think he will?” Tapper asked.

“I think he will,” Zelensky asserted. “But it’s his decision, of course, and about the safety situation, it depends. But I think he’s the leader of the United States, and that’s why he should come here to see.”

White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said on Monday that “we are currently not planning a trip by the President of the United States to Ukraine.”

Zelenskyy urged other nations not to be “afraid” of nuclear war with Russia.

“The director of the CIA warned that he’s worried Putin might use a tactical nuclear weapon in this fight. Are you worried?” Tapper asked.

“Not only me, I think all over the world, all the countries have to be worried,” Zelensky responded. “Because, you know that it kind of be not real information, but it can be the truth because when they began to speak about one or another battles or involves enemies, or nuclear weapon, or some chemical, you know, issues, chemical weapons, they should do.”

“They could– I mean, they can. For them, life of the people is nothing,” he added. “That’s why we should think, not be afraid. I mean, that not be afraid, be ready. But that is not the question for to Ukraine, and not only for the Ukraine, for all over the world, I think so.”

In March, Zelenskyy taunted the West for being “afraid” of Moscow, in a bid to get fighter jets.

“I’ve talked to the defenders of Mariupol today. I’m in constant contact with them. Their determination, heroism and firmness are astonishing,” Zelenskyy said in a video early Sunday. “If only those who have been thinking for 31 days on how to hand over dozens of jets and tanks had 1% of their courage.”

“So, who is in charge of the Euro-Atlantic community? Is it still Moscow, thanks to its scare tactics?” Zelenskyy continued. “Our partners must step up their aid to Ukraine.”

Apparently, it is extreme cowardice not to run into WWIII for a foreign nation.

“This should be known as soon as possible by as many people on earth as possible so that everyone understands who and why was simply afraid to prevent this tragedy. Afraid to simply make a decision,” Zelenskyy said.

CCP, russia, Ukraine

China Calls for Facts on “Deeply Disturbing” Bucha Massacre, Tells All Sides to “avoid Unfounded Accusations”

1 Comment

Multiple days following Kiev alleging mass killings of civilians committed by Russian forces in the Ukrainian town of Bucha which has been driving headlines in the West, China has weighed in for the first time, also as the EU and US ratchet sanctions on Moscow over what they say are clear war crimes.

China’s ambassador to the United Nations Ambassador Zhang Jun said on Tuesday that the reports and images coming out of Bucha are “very disturbing”, but stressed that any accusations against Russian forces must be independently verified and based firmly in facts.

“Attacks against civilians are unacceptable and should not occur,” the ambassador said. “The reports and images of civilian deaths in Bucha are deeply disturbing.”

But he added a key caveat while stopping short of condemning Moscow or Vladimir Putin, stressing that “circumstances and specific causes of the incident should be verified and established” and that “all sides should exercise restraint and avoid unfounded accusations.”

And Reuters reported further his words as follows:

Speaking at a Security Council meeting, Ambassador Zhang Jun repeated Beijing’s stance that sanctions are not effective in solving the Ukraine crisis but instead they accelerate the economic spillover. He also called the United States, NATO and the European Union to engage in a dialogue with Russia.

Chinese state-run media suggested what’s widely being referred to as the ‘Bucha massacre’ in which at least 300 civilians died is a manufactured event meant to paint Russia into a corner. “An editorial in Global Times, the nationalist tabloid affiliated with party mouthpiece People’s Daily, said the incident should not be used as a pretext for inflaming the situation,” SCMP notes.

Meanwhile the European Union has implied that Beijing is being tone deaf on the Ukraine issue, with EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell characterizing the latest EU summit with Xi Jinping as a “deaf dialogue”.

“China wanted to set aside our difference on Ukraine,” he said of last week’s virtual summit. “They didn’t want to talk about Ukraine. They didn’t want to talk about human rights and other issues, and instead focused on the positive things.”

China’s foreign ministry on Wednesday accused Washington of “fanning the flames” in Ukraine…

The clear allegation out of Brussels is that Beijing is showing little active interest in ending the war in Ukraine. Recently European leaders have been urging Beijing to intervene diplomatically to convince Putin to halt the invasion, which is now focused on securing Ukraine’s eastern regions.

Republished from ZeroHedge.com with permission

russia, Ukraine, War

Zelensky Says Seeking Peace ‘without Delay’ in Latest Round of Talks with Russia

Leave a comment

Sophie Mann
March 28th, 2022

Ukraine may be on track to declare neutrality and offer security guarantees to Russia “without delay,” President Volodymyr Zelensky said Monday, ahead of another day of negotiations to the weeks-long Russian invasion of his country.  

Ukraine’s priority, Zelensky also said, is continuing to ensure sovereignty and “territorial integrity,” in the face of a Russian government seeking to potentially divide up the nation.

Russia continues to demand that Ukraine drop aspirations of joining NATO, which Moscow sees as a threat to its own standing. Zelensky says the question of maintaining neutrality, which would keep Ukraine out of NATO, should be put to a vote by Ukrainians following a Russian withdrawal.

In an interview that, according to the Associated Press, has been banned from being published in Russia, Zelensky said, “We must come to an agreement with the president of the Russian Federation, and in order to reach an agreement, he needs to get out of there on his own feet … and come to meet me.”

Zelensky also emphasized Ukraine’s need for security guarantees of its own.

Russia Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said that President Vladimir Putin and Zelensky could meet, but only after key tenets of a potential deal are worked out.

“The meeting is necessary once we have clarity regarding solutions on all key issue,” he said. 

Talks between the neighboring countries have been going on for days now, failing to yield a deal that could end the more than month-old war.

In his nightly video address to his people, Zelensky told Ukrainians that he is seeking peace “without delay” in talks that are scheduled to begin in Istanbul, Turkey.

Moscow says its focus is now on take control of Ukraine’s entire eastern Donbas region, which has been partially controlled by Russia-backed separatists since 2014. A Russian military official said Friday that troops were being redirected to the east from other parts of the country, according to the Associated Press. 

Geopolitics, Independent Media, Military, Notable Occurrence, Positive News, Uncategorized

Afghanistan Frees Nearly 200 Taliban Prisoners to Push Peace Talks

Leave a comment

Hamid Shalizi and Abdul Qadir Sediqi
September 2, 2020

KABUL—Afghanistan has freed nearly 200 Taliban prisoners to spur long-delayed peace talks, as a team of negotiators readies to fly this week to Qatar’s capital, Afghan officials said on Wednesday.

The prisoners formed part of a group of 400 jailed “hardcore” Islamist separatists whose stalled release had appeared set to delay talks between the government and the insurgent group to end nearly two decades of war.

“The Afghan government has released another batch of the remaining Taliban prisoners and the work is still underway to move the prisoner exchange process forward,” Sediq Sediqqi, a spokesman for President Ashraf Ghani, said in a statement.

He did not give the exact number, however. Two officials said the releases from the main jail in the capital Kabul took place on Monday and Tuesday, at the same time that the Taliban freed six Afghan special forces.

About 120 prisoners remain to be freed in line with Taliban demands, including six whose release some Western governments, including Australia, have objected to.

A government-mandated negotiation team is likely to fly on Thursday to Doha, the initial venue for negotiations, said Fraidoon Kwazoon, the spokesman for Abdullah Abdullah, the head of the High Council for National Reconciliation.

“Tomorrow the team is leaving for Doha,” he told Reuters, without saying when talks were expected to start.

The 400 prisoners were the last of 5,000 whose release was agreed in a February pact between the United States and the Taliban allowing for the withdrawal of U.S. troops.

The release was a condition for the start of talks between the Taliban and the government, which also wants the militants to free 24 members of the Afghan special forces and pilots.

The government was reluctant to release the last 400 prisoners, whom it blamed for involvement in some of the worst violence. After freeing 80 last month, it delayed further releases as the Taliban dismissed calls for a ceasefire.

Wednesday’s release came amid a surge in Taliban violence and clashes with Afghan troops. In eastern Paktia province, a Taliban car bomb killed three Afghan security forces, a regional official said, while elsewhere, the defense ministry said, 24 Taliban were killed in the last 24 hours.

Thousands of Afghan security forces and civilians have been killed since the February peace deal, data from the United Nations, and the government shows.

By Hamid Shalizi and Abdul Qadir Sediqi

Geopolitics, Notable Occurrence, Uncategorized

For First Time Ever, US Officially Rejects China’s ‘Unlawful’ South China Sea Claims

Leave a comment

LAURA WIDENER
July 13th, 2020

The U.S. released its very first official statement rejecting most China’s territorial claims in the South China Sea as “unlawful.”

The official document released Monday afternoon by the U.S. State Department stated, “Beijing’s claims to offshore resources across most of the South China Sea are completely unlawful, as is its campaign of bullying to control them.”

The document rejects China’s claims to certain territories, such as James Shoal, located 50 nautical miles from Malaysia, as well as other specific territories off the coasts of Vietnam, Indonesia, and the Philippines. China has claimed some of these territories in its “Nine-Dashed Line” claim announced in 2009, despite these territories being located up to 1,000 nautical miles away from China’s coast.

The U.S. does recognize China’s claim to the Spratly Island, but rejects any claim China makes beyond a 12-nautical mile limit of the Spratly Islands.

South China Sea claims map (Voice of America/WikiCommons)

The U.S. position aligns with a 2016 Arbitral Tribunal decision, in which it rejected China’s claims as baseless against international law.

The document also rejects China’s aggressive behavior, including bullying and intimidation tactics used by China against other Southeast Asian coastal nations who also make territorial claims in the South China Sea.

“The PRC’s [People’s Republic of China] predatory world view has no place in the 21st century,” the document states. “The PRC has no legal grounds to unilaterally impose its will on the region.”

“The world will not allow Beijing to treat the South China Sea as its maritime empire. America stands with our Southeast Asian allies and partners in protecting their sovereign rights to offshore resources, consistent with their rights and obligations under international law,” the document states.

Tensions between the U.S. and China have been intensifying in the South China Sea recently as China is increasing its aggressive behavior and the U.S. is increasing its freedom of navigation patrols in the region.

The U.S. has repeatedly denounced China’s militarization of artificial islands in the South China Sea, as well as its construction of military bases and other industrial facilities in the region, and aggressive behavior toward other nations’ ships in the region.

“We stand with the international community in defense of freedom of the seas and respect for sovereignty and reject any push to impose ‘might makes right’ in the South China Sea or the wider region,” the U.S. document added.

Here is the full statement released by the State Department:

The United States champions a free and open Indo-Pacific. Today we are strengthening U.S. policy in a vital, contentious part of that region — the South China Sea. We are making clear: Beijing’s claims to offshore resources across most of the South China Sea are completely unlawful, as is its campaign of bullying to control them.

In the South China Sea, we seek to preserve peace and stability, uphold freedom of the seas in a manner consistent with international law, maintain the unimpeded flow of commerce, and oppose any attempt to use coercion or force to settle disputes. We share these deep and abiding interests with our many allies and partners who have long endorsed a rules-based international order.

These shared interests have come under unprecedented threat from the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Beijing uses intimidation to undermine the sovereign rights of Southeast Asian coastal states in the South China Sea, bully them out of offshore resources, assert unilateral dominion, and replace international law with “might makes right.” Beijing’s approach has been clear for years. In 2010, then-PRC Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi told his ASEAN counterparts that “China is a big country and other countries are small countries and that is just a fact.” The PRC’s predatory world view has no place in the 21st century.

The PRC has no legal grounds to unilaterally impose its will on the region. Beijing has offered no coherent legal basis for its “Nine-Dashed Line” claim in the South China Sea since formally announcing it in 2009. In a unanimous decision on July 12, 2016, an Arbitral Tribunal constituted under the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention – to which the PRC is a state party – rejected the PRC’s maritime claims as having no basis in international law. The Tribunal sided squarely with the Philippines, which brought the arbitration case, on almost all claims.

As the United States has previously stated, and as specifically provided in the Convention, the Arbitral Tribunal’s decision is final and legally binding on both parties. Today we are aligning the U.S. position on the PRC’s maritime claims in the SCS with the Tribunal’s decision. Specifically:

  • The PRC cannot lawfully assert a maritime claim – including any Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) claims derived from Scarborough Reef and the Spratly Islands – vis-a-vis the Philippines in areas that the Tribunal found to be in the Philippines’ EEZ or on its continental shelf. Beijing’s harassment of Philippine fisheries and offshore energy development within those areas is unlawful, as are any unilateral PRC actions to exploit those resources. In line with the Tribunal’s legally binding decision, the PRC has no lawful territorial or maritime claim to Mischief Reef or Second Thomas Shoal, both of which fall fully under the Philippines’ sovereign rights and jurisdiction, nor does Beijing have any territorial or maritime claims generated from these features.
  • As Beijing has failed to put forth a lawful, coherent maritime claim in the South China Sea, the United States rejects any PRC claim to waters beyond a 12-nautical mile territorial sea derived from islands it claims in the Spratly Islands (without prejudice to other states’ sovereignty claims over such islands). As such, the United States rejects any PRC maritime claim in the waters surrounding Vanguard Bank (off Vietnam), Luconia Shoals (off Malaysia), waters in Brunei’s EEZ, and Natuna Besar (off Indonesia). Any PRC action to harass other states’ fishing or hydrocarbon development in these waters – or to carry out such activities unilaterally – is unlawful.
  • The PRC has no lawful territorial or maritime claim to (or derived from) James Shoal, an entirely submerged feature only 50 nautical miles from Malaysia and some 1,000 nautical miles from China’s coast. James Shoal is often cited in PRC propaganda as the “southernmost territory of China.” International law is clear: An underwater feature like James Shoal cannot be claimed by any state and is incapable of generating maritime zones. James Shoal (roughly 20 meters below the surface) is not and never was PRC territory, nor can Beijing assert any lawful maritime rights from it.

The world will not allow Beijing to treat the South China Sea as its maritime empire. America stands with our Southeast Asian allies and partners in protecting their sovereign rights to offshore resources, consistent with their rights and obligations under international law. We stand with the international community in defense of freedom of the seas and respect for sovereignty and reject any push to impose “might makes right” in the South China Sea or the wider region.

Geopolitics, Independent Media, Independent Research, Notable Occurrence, politics, Uncategorized

UNW Weekly Report(Feb 16th – 22nd): Barr, Assange, Democratic Debate

Leave a comment

Ryan DeLarme
February 22nd, 2020

The panic is real and palpable this week as attacks against the “patriots” increase from all directions. Last week we reported that AG William Barr was coming under heavy fire from a wide range of talking heads and frightened political figures, this week the fearful outrage has only intensified. Maxine Waters took to twitter to lend her voice to the chorus of creep-state assets casting shade at the Attorney General:

So they (deep-state) are following their usual playbook, next we see them activate their newsrags and mouthpieces:

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/1100-doj-officials-call-william-barr-resign/story?id=69030388

https://www.law.com/ctlawtribune/2020/02/19/morale-low-at-department-of-justice-under-william-barrs-leadership-ex-staffers-say/

So 2’000 former employees of the DOJ are calling for Barr to resign… this is classic narrative control, I’ll explain why this is manipulative. First we know that the “patriots” claim to have been “cleaning house” these past 3 years, removing the decades worth of embedded deep-state assets and gate keepers. This would make it incredibly easy to round up 2’000 disgruntled ex-employee’s willing to say whatever the playbook dictates. Since William Barr is the person in position of holding these people accountable who have for years thought themselves above the law, it only makes sense that they would be attacking him from every angle.

They wouldn’t want to spin the truth in a way that specifically benefits the financial Elite and their agendas, would they? Everybody in the corporate media game plays by the rules, right? Let’s not forget the wisened words of the late David Rockefeller:

“We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine, and other great publications (the Mainstream/Mass-Media) whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during these years.

But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government.

The supernational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable

to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.”

–David Rockefeller

C.F.R. and Trilateral Commission Founder

Once the mockingbird media assets have been deployed they typically activate Hollywood next, which has long been a tool for social conditioning and predictive programing. They’ve not only encouraged Celebrity Worship but have made it a staple of western society, hoping that you’ll “follow the stars” to think and live the same way they do. Like clockwork we had Alyssa Milano, Rosie O’Donnell, John Liguizamo, and Mark Ruffalo simultaneously attack the AG on twitter (echo chamber) and promoting this petition to force Barr to resign.

Next we have Wapo (who have historically been a media asset of the see-eye-aye) running this story about Barr threatening to quit due to the President tweeting about ongoing investigations. This seems like optics to make it seem like Barr is his own man even though rogue military intelligence claims they are fighting on the same side to hold the deep-state accountable. Another interesting tidbit is that the reporter pushing this story, Matt Zapotosky, was the same guy claiming that the bogus Carter Page FISA evidence didn’t affect the validity of the FISA application, which it in fact did. Is this just bias or is it something more? We see these folks who cover the DOJ as media gatekeepers where if somebody isn’t playing ball they attack. Even if they manage to stop Barr, rest assured there will be another to take his place. 

After the attacks on Barr, essentially reducing him to little more than a political lackey to Trump, they decided to move on to the next looming threat: Julianne Assange. IAC/Clinton owned rag The Daily Beast ran a story with the headline “Trump Offered Assange Pardon if he Covered Up Russian Hack” which doesn’t even make sense, the judge dismissed the lawsuit against Trump, wikileaks, and russia last year. This is an attempt to get in front of the story before Juliane Assange’s extradition trial. We know they have plenty to be afraid of in regards to wikileaks and what Assange has to say about the hack. For instance, many believe the late seth Rich handed Assange the server when he caught the DNC rigging the election against Bernie Sanders in favor of Hillary Clinton. 

Former US Congresswoman Dana Rohrabacher has actually met with Assange and had this to say:

“There is a lot of misinformation floating out there regarding my meeting with Julian Assange so let me provide some clarity on the matter: 

At no time did I talk to President Trump about Julian Assange.  Likewise, I was not directed by Trump or anyone else connected with him to meet with Julian Assange. I was on my own fact finding mission at personal expense to find out information I thought was important to our country.  I was shocked to find out that no other member of Congress had taken the time in their official or unofficial capacity to interview Julian Assange. At no time did I offer Julian Assange anything from the President because I had not spoken with the President about this issue at all.  However, when speaking with Julian Assange, I told him that if he could provide me information and evidence about who actually gave him the DNC emails, I would then call on President Trump to pardon him. At no time did I offer a deal made by the President, nor did I say I was representing the President. Upon my return, I spoke briefly with Gen. Kelly. I told him that Julian Assange would provide information about the purloined DNC emails in exchange for a pardon. No one followed up with me including Gen. Kelly and that was the last discussion I had on this subject with anyone representing Trump or in his Administration.  

Even though I wasn’t successful in getting this message through to the President I still call on him to pardon Julian Assange, who is the true whistleblower of our time.  Finally, we are all holding our breath waiting for an honest investigation into the murder of Seth Rich.”

https://www.rohrabacher.com/news/my-meeting-with-julian-assange

We’ll have to see what happens.

The Democratic Debate has been a spectacle, particularly when Elizabeth Warren grilled Bloomberg about having employees sign NDA’s over Sexual harassment and gender discrimination allegations.

No one is doing very well. Elizabeth Warren’s been caught lying, Bloomberg won’t win no matter how much money he throws at it, they’ll never let Bernie get the nomination, and Biden is finished. So how much longer do we have to wait for Michelle Obama and Hillary Clinton to announce?

corruption, Geopolitics, Independent Media, Investigative Journalism, Uncategorized

UNW Weekly Report Jan 19th – 25th: The Bidens, Guillotines, and McCain on Epstein

Leave a comment

By Ryan DeLarme
January 25th, 2020

Hey gang! Hope everyone’s groovy no matter what narrative you cling to, because the truth is that whether or not we agree we’re all in this human mess together, and I love each and every one of you fleshy maniacs! On to the report I guess.

Some well meaning folks continued to jump through hoops defending Joe and Hunter Biden in the same fashion they did last election with Hillary Clinton, ignoring the dirt on the basis that it has been “proven” wrong by mouthpiece of the super rich the New York Times. Granted, there are a lot of accusations flying around that are so far unfounded, we’ll just have to see how this all plays out.

In other Biden family News, it appears that a Judge has ordered Hunter Biden to appear in Court in Batesville Arkansas on January 29th and explain why he shouldn’t be held in contempt for violating court orders to provide financial information in his Arkansas paternity case. The one-sentence order was prepared by Clinton and Jennifer Lancaster, attorneys for Lunden Alexis Roberts, the mother of Biden’s 16-month-old child. Some think this will lead back to Burisma but many folks have doubts that this will actually happen, regardless of the truth.
Clinton Lancaster said the paternity case has nothing to do with the president’s impeachment trial.

“My understanding is impeachment proceedings are ongoing,” Lancaster said. “I have not received any subpoena. I don’t believe we have any stake in the impeachment proceedings. We don’t have any stake in it whatsoever. We need his income so we can determine child support.”

In world revolution news, France continues to wile out against the Central Bank Political stooge Emmanuel Macron and his Regime. “Tens of thousands” of french citizens protested simultaneously in over a dozen major cities across France in what they’ve called “Marches of Light”. The Mainstream still claims it was all because of a simple “fuel tax” causing Americans to continue to remain horrifically ignorant to what’s going on there. (More on the situation in France HERE)

Another tidbit neglected by the Media is that Emmanuel Macron was actually forced to flee for his life from a theater last week amid rioting that has gone on now for over a year.  “A new French revolution is coming” French resistance sources promise.

Folks in Puerto Rico have taken things a step further… The protests there have been steadily escalating, culminating with a crowd of protesters carrying a Guillotine to the Governor’s mansion Thursday evening. 

Earthquakes continue to rock the island leaving thousands without power, Puerto Ricans are still suffering the effects from Hurricanes Irma and Maria. Late last week, residents of the city of Ponce discovered “a warehouse filled with water, cots and other unused emergency supplies,” NBC News reported. The unused supplies had been there since 2017. At least one FEMA official also resigned.

Historical events are also taking place in Africa, China, Japan, and Russia, people are voicing their disapproval of the Banking cartels and their league of corporations. A revolution was announced in Russia last week.  Basically, David Rothschild was kicked out and the Russian central bank was nationalized, which is why half the government was fired. Ring any bells? Where is that also happening currently?

In less public news, a source from Japan has claimed that “A first cousin of former Emperor Hirohito tells us the Bank of Japan has been nationalized and the Rothschilds as well as the Rockefellers have been removed from control of this country.” We obviously can’t substantiate these claims because when things happen at that high of a level it rarely becomes public, but we choose to report the hearsay as we will be following this development in the future, hoping for some sauce.

Fulfords “CIA sources” in Asia say a major offensive is underway against that country.  “The Western media is not discussing the slaughter there of several hundred million pigs due to the outbreak of the new strain of African swine flu virus (created in vitro, of course),” one source says, noting:

“Pork is the main food of the Chinese.  It is consumed every day. America cannot replace the lost pork from the massive slaughter.  You can imagine what will happen to the Chinese people without pork, which is their main source of protein.  This is being kept very quiet for obvious reasons. China had half of the world’s supply of pigs with a population of more than 700 million pigs.  This provides the main source of protein for 1.3 billion people.”

The sources also allegedly stated that:

“Xi Jinping and his cronies are behind the protesting in Hong Kong.  His plan is to bring down HK and turn Macau and Shanghai into the new financial centers.  China has been financing the protesters since the beginning. HSBC is in the process of moving their regional headquarters to Singapore. The Chinese government is planning on canceling all leases that were made with the UK, meaning they will take over the land and buildings in HK.  They are also planning on canceling the HK dollar and will allow up to 6 months for all HK dollars to be exchanged for Yuan. As you can see, China is going to destroy Hong Kong. They will of course shoot themselves in the foot, so to speak, as HK is their connection to money from the West.  China will implode from within.”

Consider these possibilities but take them with a grain of salt, especially considering that this allegedly comes from a CIA source, and they have been caught spreading complete BS many times over.

Cindy McCain, the wife of the late senator John McCain,  made an interesting statement while speaking at a conference in Florida Friday, claiming that “We all knew about Epstein. We all knew what he was doing.” Oh, you don’t say? She added “Epstein was hiding in plain sight,” and “We all knew about him. We all knew what he was doing, but we had no one that was — no legal aspect that would go after him. They were afraid of him. For whatever reason, they were afraid of him.”

In impeachment news, the media spent a good deal of time building up their new hero Lev Parnas. He’s been leveling acquisitions at the President and his attorney Giuliani, who claims that Lev was once a close friend of his. Really, people are getting bored of this senate trial despite all the dramatic pauses, feigning emotions, “BELIEVE ME” facial expressions and all the usual body language that tells more truth than any of the individuals involved. 

It seems like each week we could do a highlight reel of the most ridiculous and or hypocritical statements coming from Adam Schiff. Here is this week’s Adam Schiff moment:


Continuing with the Russian narrative and then claiming that the President was “Manipulated” into “Disbelieving his own intelligence agencies” (Not mentioning the fact that said agencies helped Obama spy and have been working against him from the start) Schiff made this argument roughly 24 hours after the FISA court officially stated two of the warrants on Carter Page, pursued and justified by the intelligence community, were bogus. The very same “intelligence community” that the President “Disbelieved”, well it looks like his instincts were correct in this instance… but let’s not shit ourselves, he’s probably being told what to do by people in military intelligence that he can trust, likely the same folks who asked him to run.