Tag Archives: Federal Reserve

The Fed Has Triggered A Stagflationary Disaster That Will Hit Hard This Year

By Brandon Smith

I don’t think I can overstate the danger that the U.S. economy is in right now as we enter 2022. While most people are caught up in the ongoing drama of Covid-19, a REAL threat looms over the nation in the form of a stagflationary tidal wave. The mainstream media is attempting to place the blame on “supply chain disruptions,” but this is a misrepresentation of the issue.

The two factors are indeed intertwined, but the reality is that inflation is the cause of supply chain disruptions, not the result of supply chain disruptions. If we look at the underlying stats for price rises in essential products we can get a clearer picture.

Before I get into my argument, I really want to stress that this is a precarious time and I suggest that people prepare accordingly. In just the past few months I have seen personal expenses rise at least 20% overall, and I’m sure it’s the same or worse for most of you. Stocking necessities and safe-haven investments with intrinsic value like physical precious metals are a good choice for protecting whatever buying power your dollars have left…

Higher prices everywhere

The Consumer Price Index (CPI) is officially at the highest levels in 40 years. CPI measurements often diminish the scale of the problem because they do not include things like food, energy and housing which are core expenses for the public. CPI calculations have also been “adjusted” over the past few decades by the government to express a more positive view on inflation. If we look at the inflation numbers at Shadowstats, calculated according to the same methods they used in the 1980s, we see a dramatic increase in CPI which paints a more dire (but more accurate) picture.

U.S. food prices have spiked to levels not seen since 2008 at the onset of the credit and derivatives collapse that brought about tens of trillions of dollars in Federal Reserve bailouts.

If we look beyond the 2008 crisis, food costs do not see a similar jump until the 1980s. Rising food prices in the US are often obscured by creative accounting and “shrinkflation” (shrinking packages and rising prices), but if we look at global food prices the average is a 30% jump in the past year.

Rental and home prices have also gone into the stratosphere. Rental costs went up around 18% in 2021, and this is an extension of a trend that has been prevalent for the past decade. Prices have been rising for a while, it’s just that now the avalanche has accelerated.

Home prices are currently out of the range of most new potential home buyers. Values jumped 16% in the past year alone, with the average property costing $408,000. Home sales continue to remain elevated compared to two years ago despite inflating prices for one reason and one reason only – the mass migration of Americans away from the draconian mandates and bureaucracy of blue states into more conservative states.

I live in Montana, a primary destination for people relocating, and from my experience the majority of these people are conservatives seeking to escape the vaccine and lockdown mandates in places like California, New York and Illinois. They see the writing on the wall and they are trying to get ahead of the economic and social calamity that will surely befall such states.

I would also note that home sales have finally begun to flatten in the past six months but prices are not dropping, which is a trend that I think needs to be explored further because it illustrates the larger issue of stagflation.

When inflation becomes stagflation

Understand that prices are not just rising because of increased demand (demand is starting to fall in many sectors), prices are rising because of increased money supply and dollar devaluation which is not yet being reflected in the Dollar Index.

Take a look at U.S. GDP and you will see that for the past several years it has tracked in tandem with price inflation. Obviously, if prices inflate then this means people are spending more, which then leads to higher U.S. GDP; it’s like magic, right? In other words, inflation makes it seem as though U.S. GDP is always improving.

However, this has not been the case in the past couple of years.

Official GDP has flattened despite the fact that U.S. money supply and inflation have rocketed higher. What does this mean? I believe it is a sign of stagflation and a reckoning in 2022. If we examine inflation adjusted GDP numbers from Shadowstats we see that GDP has declined rather aggressively in the past couple of years.

We can also see odd tendencies in oil and gasoline prices. While it’s true that gas prices have been higher in the past, this does not address the full context of the situation. U.S. travel spending has declined 12% since 2019 and airline travel has dropped at least 21% in the past year. Average gasoline usage dropped after 2019 and still has not recovered. Yet, gas prices continue to rise? In other words, travel demand is stagnant but prices are INCREASING – this is another signal of inflationary pressures and dollar devaluation. Oil is priced in dollars globally, and therefore any inflation in the dollar will be readily visible in oil. This would help explain why pandemic paranoia and reduced travel have not caused gas prices to drop.

If the current momentum continues the majority of necessities in the U.S. will not be affordable for most people by next year. We are looking at a fast-moving decline in production along with a swift explosion in prices. In other words, a stagflationary disaster.

This is the Federal Reserve’s fault

I and many other alternative economists have been warning about the inevitable inflation/stagflation crisis for years, but the most important factor to understand is WHO is responsible this event?

The mainstream financial media is going to protect the government and the Federal Reserve at all costs during this breakdown. They are going to blame Covid, the lockdowns here and overseas as well as the supply chain bottleneck.

The Fed is the true culprit, though.

While there have been many American presidents and other politicians who have supported the Fed in its inflationary activities, the central bank itself needs to be held accountable for the downturn that is about to occur. This is a process that started back at the founding of the Fed, but spread like cancer after the crash of 2008 and the introduction of 12+ years of stimulus and bailout measures along with near-zero interest rates.

The inflationary end-game

The pandemic is the perfect cover for the inflationary end-game. In 2008 the response to the crisis was to print and pump dollars into banks and corporations in the U.S. and around the globe. This money supply was held in corporate coffers and in central banks overseas, which slowed the effects of inflation. This set the precedent for subversive stimulus policies by giving the Fed a blank check to do whatever it wanted.

In 2020, the Fed created trillions more but this time the money was injected directly into the U.S. economy through Covid stimulus checks, PPP loans and other measures. In the alternative economic field we call this “helicopter money.” These dollars triggered a massive retail buying spree in 2020, but with more dollars in the economy chasing less goods prices are now spiking much higher.

The big discussion today is whether or not the Fed will taper their asset purchases, reduce their balance sheet and raise interest rates to counter inflation?

The fact is it won’t matter; inflation/stagflation will continue or even accelerate as the Fed tapers. With a taper comes the threat of a flattening yield curve in Treasury bonds as well as the danger of bonds and dollars being dumped by foreign investors and central banks. If the trillions upon trillions of dollars being held overseas come flooding back into the U.S., inflation will continue at its current pace or erupt even higher. In fact, the world’s ownership of dollars reached a 26-year low recently. The global transition away from the dollar, toward inflation-resistant investments, has already begun.

This is not a policy error

I explained this Catch-22 threat in my recent article The Fed’s Catch-22 Taper Is a Weapon, Not a Policy Error. In that essay I outline the Fed’s documented history of creating economic disasters that conveniently end up benefiting their friends in the international banks.

I also explained (with evidence) how the Federal Reserve actually takes its marching orders from the Bank for International Settlements, a globalist institution which along with the International Monetary Fund and World Economic Forum is openly seeking a one-world economic system and one-world currency system.

I do not believe that the Fed’s actions are a product of ignorance or stupidity or basic greed. I do not believe the Fed is scrambling to keep the U.S. economy afloat. I believe according to the evidence that the Fed knows exactly what it is doing. The pandemic offers a perfect scapegoat for an engineered crash of the U.S. economy which the Fed is trying to facilitate.

Why? Because the more desperate people are financially, the easier they are to buy off with false promises and a loaf of bread. They are easier to control. On top of that, with the U.S. economy reduced to second- or third-world status, it is easier to sell the public on the predetermined solution – total global centralization and far less freedom.

As the stagflationary crash plays out, never forget who was really the cause of the public’s suffering. In the fog of national crisis it is easy for the establishment to shift blame and responsibility and to cloud the truth. The inflation calamity is about to get much worse, and as it does we need to rally newly awakened people to take action against the central bankers and globalists behind it.

With global tensions spiking, thousands of Americans are moving their IRA or 401(k) into an IRA backed by physical gold. Now, thanks to a little-known IRS Tax Law, you can too. Learn how with a free info kit on gold from Birch Gold Group. It reveals how physical precious metals can protect your savings, and how to open a Gold IRA. Click here to get your free Info Kit on Gold.

This article was written by Brandon Smith and originally published at Birch Gold Group

The Original Deep State

 Robert Spencer,
August 26th, 2020

Donald Trump is not the first president to face down a deep-state cabal, that is, an unelected oligarchy of shadowy figures who wielded enormous power while being unaccountable to the American public. The first was President Andrew Jackson, who faced down the Bank of the United States in the 1820s and 1830s; then as now, the deep state has apparently included a significant financial element. Trump’s top economic aide Lawrence Kudlow said it last October: “I don’t want to get into a lot of Fed bashing,” but “their models are highly flawed. The deep state board staff, of course, has not been very helpful — oops, did I say that?”

Yes, he did. And whatever the actual role of the Federal Reserve in the coup attempt against Trump, there is no doubt that some have been sounding warnings about it since at least 1931 – people in a position to know.

As Rating America’s Presidents: An America-First Look at Who Is Best, Who Is Overrated, and Who Was An Absolute Disaster explains, the Federal Reserve was established in December 1913, during the “progressive” Woodrow Wilson administration. But the Fed was just a new version of the same Bank of the United States that Jackson fought: a private corporation that kept the public treasury. Its foes argued that it was dangerous to turn power over the public funds to an oligarchy of private financiers, since the possibility for corruption, and for a de facto second government developed by buying favors until large enough to challenge the government of the United States, was immense.

Yet as far as Wilson was concerned, that was by design. Late in the presidency of Theodore Roosevelt, the Knickerbocker Trust Company was failing, leading to a significant economic downturn, the Panic of 1907. Banking baron J. P. Morgan stepped in to aid banks that were failing and thus minimize the crisis. Wilson, at that time the president of Princeton University, showed a taste for authoritarian government, writing: “All this trouble could be averted if we appointed a committee of six or seven public-spirited men like J. P. Morgan to handle the affairs of our country.”

In establishing the Federal Reserve System, the nation went a long way toward doing just that. Wilson’s support for it contradicted his assurances during his 1912 campaign that he was opposed to a central bank. He declared:

A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is privately concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men who, even if their action be honest and intended for the public interest, are necessarily concentrated upon the great undertakings in which their own money is involved and who necessarily, by very reason of their own limitations, chill and check and destroy genuine economic freedom.

Yet Wilson’s opposition to a central bank proved to be as hollow a claim as Wilson’s reelection slogan, “He Kept Us out of War,” would prove to be when the U.S. entered World War I on the flimsiest of pretexts. The Federal Reserve Act placed various regional Federal Reserve banks in private hands, controlled by a central board that was appointed by the president. The central board was supposed to prevent the growth of a moneyed oligarchy that would exercise undue control over the American political process, which was exactly what Jackson and Tyler had decried about the nineteenth-century bank.

But the board itself came to be dominated by those oligarchs, and once again, the public funds were in the control of a small number of people who had not been elected by the American people. If anyone was responsible for an enormous concentration of power “in the hands of a few men,” it was Wilson.

Rating America’s Presidents recounts that no less a luminary than William Gibbs McAdoo, who was Wilson’s treasury secretary when the Federal Reserve came into existence, sounded the alarm about the Federal Reserve in his memoirs, which were published in 1931. Wrote McAdoo: “The fact is that there is a serious danger of this country becoming a plutodemocracy; that is, a sham republic with the real government in the hands of a small clique of enormously wealthy men, who speak through their money, and whose influence, even today, radiates to every corner of the United States.” For this, he could thank Wilson and the Federal Reserve Act.

That’s the same danger the U.S. faces today: becoming a sham republic with the real government in the hands of a small clique. It is because Donald Trump stands in between that clique and unchallenged hegemony that he is so fervently hated today.

Gold, Silver and the Federal Reserve: a Transitioning Economy

Ryan DeLarme
July 27th,2020

While the world is currently filled with no shortage of crises that hold our daily attention, something even bigger than most folks can even imagine has been taking place in the background. The current Administration, in tandem with countless others, has taken the bull by the horns and nationalized the Federal Reserve banking system, essentially neutering the central bank cartel. They are building an entirely new economy, which will likely be backed by sound money. In fact, evidence heavily suggests that we are already deep in the transitional phase. You’d think the banksters and their corporatocracy would have activated all assets against Trump by now, right? Oh, wait a minute..

Understanding the Federal Reserve Cartel: Our Unelected Leaders

Who owns the private corporation that controls our economy? Well you got your Goldman Sachs, Rockefellers, Lehmans and Kuhn Loebs of New York; the Rothschilds of Paris and London; the Warburgs of Hamburg; the Lazards of Paris; and the Israel Moses Seifs of Rome. Many of the bank’s stockholders reside in Europe.

The US government had a historical distrust of BIS, lobbying unsuccessfully for its demise at the 1944 post-WWII Bretton Woods Conference. Instead the Eight Families’ power was exacerbated, with the Bretton Woods creation of the IMF and the World Bank. This is also when we went off the Gold Standard for good.

The Four Horsemen of Banking (Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, Citigroup and Wells Fargo) own the Four Horsemen of Oil (Exxon Mobil, Royal Dutch/Shell, BP and Chevron Texaco); in tandem with Deutsche Bank, BNP, Barclays and other European old money behemoths. But their monopoly over the global economy does not end at the edge of the oil patch.

Companies under Rockefeller control include Exxon Mobil, Chevron Texaco, BP Amoco, Marathon Oil, Freeport McMoran, Quaker Oats, ASARCO, United, Delta, Northwest, ITT, International Harvester, Xerox, Boeing, Westinghouse, Hewlett-Packard, Honeywell, International Paper, Pfizer, Motorola, Monsanto, Union Carbide and General Foods, writes Dean Henderson at The Herland Report and Free21. In modern times this would also include most of the technocracy [Google, Facebook, Youtube, etc.]

According to company 10K filings to the SEC, the Four Horsemen of Banking are among the top ten stock holders of virtually every Fortune 500 corporation.

So who then are the stockholders in these money center banks?

This information is guarded much more closely. Queries to bank regulatory agencies regarding stock ownership in the top 25 US bank holding companies are given Freedom of Information Act status, before being denied on “national security” grounds. This is rather ironic, since many of the bank’s stockholders reside in Europe.

Almost every country, including the United States, is snared in a Central Banking trap of fiat money and fractional reserve banking. Fiat currency is defined as “money that is intrinsically useless; is used only as a medium of exchange.” The value of money is set by the supply and demand for money and the supply and demand for other goods and services in the economy. The prices for those goods and services, including gold and silver, are allowed to fluctuate based on market forces. 

The seemingly endless stream of fiat currency from fractional reserve banking has also been a wonderful tool, whoever controls the magic money making wand essentially controls the Government. Here in the US that control lays in the hands of a privately owned corporation called the Federal Reserve, it’s board members and those they serve could be seen as “Unelected leaders”. These people control the flow of cash, and with it they control any politician who lacks a conscience, typically by funding them into office.

If we simply returned to a gold standard, we could POTENTIALLY remove the mechanism of power and control held by criminality in the highest places.

The Return of Gold and Silver

It has long been dismissed as a fool’s errand, on par with abandoning the Federal Reserve and other trappings of the modern economy. Mainstream economists deride it almost without exception. Reintroducing the gold standard would “be a disaster for any large advanced economy,” says the University of Chicago’s Anil Kashyap, who connects enthusiasm for it with “macroeconomic illiteracy.” His colleague, Nobel laureate Richard Thaler, struggles with its very underlying principle: “Why tie to gold? Why not 1982 Bordeaux?”

Yet the idea that every US dollar should be backed by a small amount of actual gold is more popular than economists’ opinions might suggest. Advocates include members of Congress and president Donald Trump. Enthusiasm for a return to the gold standard has become more prominent since Trump’s most recent nominees to fill the vacant Federal Reserve governorship have endorsed a return. The first two—Herman Cain and Stephen Moore—both dropped out of consideration, but the third, economist Judy Shelton, announced recently in a Trump tweet, may be the most ardent in her support.

Last year, Shelton called for a “new Bretton Woods conference,” akin to the 1944 meeting that established the post-war economic order, perhaps to be held at Mar-a-Lago, where a return to the gold standard could be considered. “We make America great again by making America’s money great again,” she wrote in the journal of the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank.

Since 2011, at least six states have passed laws recognizing gold and silver as currency; another three are presently contemplating bills of their own. The surprising success of Ron Paul, a Texas Republican Congressman and ardent gold bug, in the 2008 and 2012 elections showed the potency of these ideas among the electorate. In its 2012 and 2016 campaign platforms, the Republican Party called for a commission to investigate the viability of a return to a gold standard system. The Republican-controlled House of Representatives passed a bill including such a commission in both 2015 and 2017, but both times the proposals died in the Senate. Last year, Alexander Mooney, a Republican representative from West Virginia, took that a step further when he introduced a bill proposing a full-on return to the gold standard. (The bill has no cosponsors and, unsurprisingly, has gone nowhere.)

Today, with inflation unusually low and stable, the gold standard is a tougher sell than it once was. But as trust in American institutions wanes, there is renewed support for money backed by something tangible, not the say-so of the government. If inflation picks up once again, a solid base of gold standard evangelists is ready to take it mainstream. That a supporter of the gold standard may yet wind up on the Fed’s board of governors is yet more evidence that the idea’s prospects are shining brighter than they have in many years .

How the gold standard works

Money depends on trust—the faith that it will hold its value so that, when the time comes to spend it, it will be accepted without question in exchange for what the holder expects it to be worth. Inflation eats away at that value. 

In modern times, governments are often a culprit behind inflation. Since they enjoy a monopoly on printing money, they can issue new currency at virtually no cost. But governments are run by vote-seeking politicians, who might print more money to juice short-term growth needed to win re-election, inadvertently causing inflation to flare up later. This quandary isn’t theoretical, and has happened with surprising frequency throughout history. To cite a recent, prominent example, US president Richard Nixon bent to this temptation (pdf) during his 1972 re-election campaign—contributing to the breakout of inflation that ravaged the American economy throughout the 1970s and early 1980s.

There’s a seemingly easy fix: Take the power of money creation out of the hands of politicians. According to the monetarist theory popularized by economist Milton Friedman in the 1970s, preventing inflation requires fixing the supply of money. The gold standard, by limiting the dollars the government can print to the weight of gold it holds in reserves, is one way of doing so.

The US adopted the gold standard in 1879, when Congress finally followed Britain, Germany, France, and other advanced nations. By holding national currencies stable against gold, the international embrace of the gold standard encouraged foreign investment and facilitated trade, giving rise to the first era of intense globalization.

Here’s a very cartoonish version of how it worked: The US Treasury agreed to redeem a set weight of gold in exchange for a fixed number of dollars, and vice versa. During the classical gold standard era—from 1879 to 1914 in the US—one troy ounce of gold fetched $21.

The gold standard’s discipline came from the fact that the government had to be sure it held the necessary volume of gold in reserve, in case anyone wanted to exchange dollars for a set amount of the shiny metal. If it printed more money than it held in gold reserves, the state risked hyperinflation or causing a financial crisis by shattering faith in the solidity of its currency.

In theory, the gold standard, therefore, limits government spending to only what it can raise in taxes or borrow against its gold reserve, and prevents it from simply printing money to pay its debts. It also takes power over the money supply away from central bankers. Indeed, it might render central banks mostly unnecessary. Bear in mind that for most of the classical gold standard era, the US didn’t have a central bank, which was introduced in 1913.

Signs of the “Transitional Economy”

Since President Trump has come into office he started to set this up, he got rid of the TTP, put Tariffs on China, reworked NAFTA, began deregulation’s (roughly 25’000 regulations!), working with India and other allies to decouple from China, helping BREXIT with trade deals outside of the EU, the list goes on and on and would be unrealistic to be comprehensive here as each week we see more evidence. The Senate Judicial committee has given the green light to Judy Shelton to be on the board of directors. Shelton’s been very vocal about the switch to sound money, and part of her plan was to absorb the FED into the national treasury, returning the power to the United States and not it’s international bankster progenitors.

The NYT (a globalist propaganda rag, track back to the CFR and other elite international think-tanks) was quick to seed people with doubt against her, reporting:

“…One question that analysts are pondering is what version of Miss Shelton will show up to work at the FED if she gets the job? A Gold Standard proponent or not? A supporter of lower rates, as she has been during Trumps administration or an inflation hawk?”

-New York Times

They seem concerned about what she is going to do, and they probably should be. We will be covering this going forward as it is a huge crux in the silent war. Keep an eye on Gold and Silver.

The Nationalization of the FED and what it Means

Ryan DeLarme
April 22nd, 2020

We are still in the midst of this Pandemic situation, and while  it is certainly true that people are sick and the virus is very real, most would agree that we are being sold fractions of truth packaged nicely with whatever agenda and spin the source happens to be promoting. The information war continues, a hefty percentage of the population are living in fear, others are making the best of it despite their uncertainty, and some can even see a light at the end of the tunnel.

President Trump is in a great position thanks to the National Emergencies Act, which was signed by every state and territory. As a direct result of this the “white-hats” in the Government were able to achieve several important objectives, primarily: the Nationalization of the Federal Reserve, and getting the Defense Production Act signed.

Our current debt-based monetary system will inevitably lead to a complete and total economic collapse.  We desperately need to make a change while we still can. By now, everyone should understand that the Federal Reserve is not part of the government but privately owned control mechanism for the central banking system and it’s cartels. Almost every country has one (central bank) and they are wonderful tools for controlling Governments. Here are some reason why the FED being Nationalized could be a good thing:

  1. Doing so would allow the federal government to quit borrowing money, dramatically reduce taxes and eventually pay off the entire U.S. national debt.  Instead of inheriting the largest debt in the history of the world, future generations would actually have a chance at economic prosperity because they would not be forced to pay off the horrific debt of previous generations.  The Federal Reserve is a perpetual debt machine, it has almost completely destroyed the value of the U.S. dollar and it has an absolutely nightmarish track record of incompetence.
  2. Our current debt-based monetary system is a perpetual debt machine.  When they need money the U.S. government swaps U.S. Treasury bonds for “Federal Reserve notes”, thus creating more government debt.  Usually the money isn’t even printed up – most of the time it is just electronically credited to the government. The Federal Reserve creates these “Federal Reserve notes” out of thin air. These Federal Reserve notes are backed by nothing and have no intrinsic value of their own.
  3. When each new dollar is created, the interest owed by the federal government on that new dollar is not also created at the same time. Therefore, more debt is actually created than the amount of money that the federal government receives from the Federal Reserve. This is a Ponzi scheme that is designed to drain wealth from the American people and transfer it to the banking system aka the perpetual debt system.
  4. Our current debt-based monetary system requires very high personal income taxes to pay for it.  It is no accident that the personal income tax was introduced at about the same time that the Federal Reserve system came into existence. If we nationalized the Federal Reserve and capped federal government spending at a reasonable percentage of GDP, it would be entirely possible to massively cut taxes and still keep our promises regarding Social Security and other important social programs at the same time.
  5. Under our current system, the U.S. national debt will never, ever be paid off.  We are many Trillions in debt and at this point we add more than a trillion dollars to that number every year.  While there is certainly a danger that we would have inflation under a debt-free monetary system, the reality is that we are absolutely guaranteed inflation under the Federal Reserve system.
  6. Most Americans believe that inflation is a fact of life, but the sad truth is that the United States has only had a major, ongoing problem with inflation since the Federal Reserve was created back in 1913. If you do not believe this, just check out this chart. Sadly, the U.S. dollar has lost well over 95 percent of its value since the Federal Reserve was created.
  7. We (hopefully) won’t have trillions of dollars of secret loans being made to big financial institutions on Wall Street and in foreign countries. Most Americans don’t realize this, but the Federal Reserve made $16.1 trillion in secret loans to their friends during the last financial crisis. Meanwhile, hundreds of small banks were left out in the cold and the American people got no help.
  8. The Federal Reserve needs to be nationalized because it is an unelected, unaccountable “fourth branch of government” that has gotten completely and totally out of control.  Even some members of Congress are now openly complaining about how much power the Fed has.  For example, Ron Paul once told MSNBC that he believes that the Federal Reserve is now more powerful than Congress…..

“…The regulations should be on the Federal Reserve. We should have transparency of the Federal Reserve. They can create trillions of dollars to bail out their friends, and we don’t even have any transparency of this. They’re more powerful than the Congress.”

And now we are here today, Trump has actually done it, further proving that he is probably not a lackey of the central banking mafia.  A lot of people out there think the worst, that we will go into a crazy economic recession but it’s scare tactics and more than likely the opposite will occur.

Many individuals throughout history have proposed to seize the functions of the Federal Reserve System and use it as a national bank to finance the long-term needs of the American people. The policy of federal lending, as distinct from federal spending, can be used to break the current political impasse. Federal lending allows us to make massive long-term commitments at modest short-term costs. For states and businesses, the cost of capital can be radically lowered – down to 0% for public infrastructure, and a competitive advantage of the United States in world markets can be secured. The overriding goal is the creation of 30+ million new jobs in production, with high capital investment, high energy intensity, high value added, and high technology.

The theoretical basis and historical validation for the program advanced here is the traditional American System of Alexander Hamilton, Friedrich List, Henry Carey, Henry Clay, Abraham Lincoln, the populists, and the New Deal. The method of transforming the central bank into a national bank to finance a recovery derives from the work of Woytinsky and Lautenbach, interpreted in the light of the experience of the US Lend-Lease Program. We are seeing what once felt like an unachievable fairy tale unfold in modern times, and most people seem to be completely in the dark as to how important and unprecedented this situation really is.

Weekly Report (March 21st-28th) Hysteria and The FED

Ryan DeLarme
March 28th, 2020


The Underground Newswire operates from the understanding that we are in the midst of a Global information war between the Central Banking system and the loose amalgamation of sub-groups (Wall Street, CIA, Vatican, p2 Masons, Mafia, Etc.) and an Alliance of patriots from many nations (USA, Britain, India, Russia, Brazil, Italy, etc.) who are also working together to remove members of this Cabal from their individual countries. The articles, essays, and political commentaries featured on this website should NOT be taken as the ultimate truth, in fact nothing should be until you can prove it yourself.

The Underground Newswire does not seek to convince or sway, rather it is our hope to indicate and suggest without violating the universal and self evident laws of free will and confusion. True objectivity may be impossible (especially these days) and while we have defended Donald Trump on many points, we are not “Pro Conservative” nor are we “Anti-Liberal”, though the accusations have been made and likely will be made again. We’d like first and foremost to suggest that we are all, every one of us, in the midst of a quiet war fought with silent weapons. The fight is world wide, louder in some places than others (think revolutions simultaneously occurring across the globe IE: Hong Kong, France, Iran, Venezuela, ETC.) It is a psychological war, and the front lines are quite literally human hearts and minds. With these weekly reports, we hope to offer alternative perspectives and speculation coming from an amalgamation of sources involved in Media, Military, Finance, and politics. 

The viral hysteria has intensified even further this week as most states have now issued stay-at-home orders, limiting people to only going out for essentials or trips that are “life sustaining”. It’s certainly true that people are sick, however, all the facts and figures don’t seem to match up across the board. The general theme is Panic, Fear, and gossip, but it’s not all doom and gloom. Despite the push for politicizing what could very well be a bioweapon attack (something Trump continuously suggests but the MSM scoffs at) there is a good deal of hope and positive news that the media doesn’t care much to touch on.

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko of NY has apparently had great success in treating the virus, claiming a 100% Cure rate after treating 350 patients. His treatment probably looks familiar to anyone paying attention:

1 – Hydroxychloroquine 200 mg 1 pill 2x a day/5 days

2 – Azithromycin 500 mg 1 pill/day/5 days

3 – Zinc sulfate 220 mg 1 pill/day/5 days

Assuming this is all true, which it very well could be, there are going to be a lot of displeased umbrella corporations out there hoping to make huge profits off of treatments/vaccines, and their media subsidiaries would naturally attack the cure. This seems to happen with all major health breakthroughs, and of course is happening now. Dr. Zelenko was interviewed by Moshe Frank on Wednesday, where he responds to critics of the treatment.

additionally, Vitamin C in high dosages has shown great effectiveness (three german links):


(this also includes a link to the original chinese treatment protocol from Shanghai, use Google Translate to take a look at it)



India has officially recommended prophylactic use of hydroxychloroquine for health workers and families of confirmed positives.

Another point of interest is British scientist Neil Ferguson, whose predictions and projections at the beginning of all of this created mass panic. He claimed that 2.2 million Americans and about half a million Brits would be killed by the Virus but since the US and the UK have effectively quarantined their citizens and shut down their economies, he seems to be walking back his doomsday scenarios, saying he feels “reasonably confident” our healthcare system can cope when the predicted peak of the epidemic arrives in a few weeks. Testifying before the U.K.’s parliamentary select committee on science and technology on Wednesday, Ferguson said he now predicts U.K. deaths from the disease will not exceed 20,000, and could be much lower.

Now of course this won’t sit well with those corrupt officials and corporations who are trying to use this pandemic/hysteria for political purposes, in fact (as with most damning data) the damage control was instantly deployed.

When it comes to speculation on the quiet war, there seems to be a large consensus that this bioweapon attack was the Deep-State’s hail mary before the hammer comes down. They are pushing fear as hard as they can, they want the economic system to crash and the entire population to be in chaos, blame it all on Trump and take back control of the US in the elections. But it’s not Trump who is the enemy per se, it’s an alliance of military strategists and personnel, intelligence officers and civilians who worked together with many countries around the world to get Trump elected so they could legally clean house of central bank cronies in every country.

On that front, AG William Barr unsealed an indictment against Venezualan President Nicolas Maduro which included drug trafficking, issued a reward for Maduro and others involved (Politically connected businessmen with financial ties to Miami who have grown fabulously wealthy due to “energy deals”). One of the individuals involved is one Alejandro Betancourt who serves as chairman and CEO of Derwick Associates which has ties to *drumroll* FUSION GPS! If you are unfamiliar with Fusion GPS you can read more:

Deep State Being Exposed: Nunes: Fusion GPS Bank Records Show Payments From Clinton Campaign & DNC

FED BOMBSHELL: Fusion GPS Bribed Dozens of MSM Journalists With Cash, While News Companies Paid Firm to Dig Dirt on Trump

We’ve touched many times on how one of the main goals of this transnational “Alliance” is to remove the central banking system entirely from each nation involved, well moves seem to have been made here in the US with POTUS taking over the federal reserve, essentially merging the FED with the US treasury. Of course the MSM is trying to make it out to be some horrible thing, this is to stir public unrest as one of the last gambits they have, but this was a more than necessary move, they are removing the power structure from the Cabal. Without the FED all they have is the what’s left of the Media.

You can read the whole article in all it’s slant and politicized glory HERE.

The Virus does not seem to be giving Hillary Clinton a free pass. Judicial Watch received 180 pages of communication between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page showing how she was protected during the 2016 election from investigations into Anthony Weiner’s laptop and further confirmed how Strzok pushed Russia smears as part of a clandestine and coordinated attempt to remove a duly elected president. Well now on the heels of all this it would seem that Hillary is now filing an “emergency” motion to skate past the court ordered deposition. Why would she want to do this? Simple, if she lies then she’s in trouble, if she tells the truth she is still in trouble, so her only option is to not show up at all. 

Now in closing I’d like to mention a few things to look out for in the coming weeks and months after the COVID-19 storm passes.

  • SETH RICH: The DNC intern who uncovered a plot to rig the primaries against Bernie in favor of Hillary. He was found dead after an alleged “Mugging” even though none of his personal belongings including watch and wallet were  missing. Sources claim that evidence exists a flash drive was used on a server at the DNC to collect what would be pretty damning data, it is also claimed that this data was handed over to Julian Assange and will be revealed at the right moment.
  • JEFFERY EPSTEIN: This was not brought into the public consciousness to just go away, there is plenty of evidence to comb through and investigations linked to Epstein are ongoing.
  • HOLLYWOOD: Pedophilia as a means to blackmail high-profile figures into playing ball and promoting what they are told is an old racket, more on this will be made public at an appropriate time.

Return to the Gold Standard Could End the Federal Reserve

By Ryan DeLarme,
Originally Published on January 12th, 2019

If you’ve ever considered investing in gold it would seem that now might be a good time to do so. Gold has seen continuous gains in the market, Gold has recently made it’s six month highs, and many countries are beginning to increase their Gold supply, particularly; China, Ireland and Tanzania.




            Keep in mind that currently there are a couple house resolutions on the back burner that could potentially put us back on the Gold Standard. As things are now, the FED controls the money and how it is handled, they can raise and lower interest rates at will. They have actually increased four times since 2016, whereas in the 8 years prior it was raised only once, so it’s becoming clear that something is going on. Also keep in mind that this is all happening just after the Rothschild’s claimed they are getting out of the trust business.  


            The Gold Standard would put actual value to our currency and it would not deflate, it would not be able to be printed out of thin air like the fiat currency we are presently accustom to. From the very dawn of America until 1971, the country had used the “gold standard” for money. Under this system, U.S. currency was backed by physical gold, much of which kept in a heavily guarded location in Fort Knox, Kentucky. This was intended to keep the price of money relatively standard and prevent runaway inflation, i.e. one dollar equals _x _grams of gold. Gold standard supporters note that the two decades in the past century with the highest inflation were the 1910s (when the Federal Reserve was created and started exerting control over the money supply) and the 1970s (when the gold standard ended).


The summary of H.R. 5404 includes what opponents of the Bill have said, stating:

“Opponents argue we abandoned the gold standard decades ago for a good reason, and it would be foolish to return.

When the Great Depression hit, ‘People hoarded gold instead of depositing it in banks, which created an international gold shortage,’ Federal Reserve vice president and deputy director of research David Wheelock said. Countries around the world basically ran out of supply and were forced off the gold standard.

The U.S. mines a lot of gold, but we’re not the biggest producer, Wheelock continued. The bigger suppliers of gold would have more control over our monetary policy, and there’s no reason to have it because we can get the advantages of the gold standard and avoid the disadvantages without being on a gold standard. Research suggests also that the sharp decrease in domestic manufacturing employment in recent decades is primarily due to other factors, such as automation.”

As Gold continues to see gains, the stock market is becoming increasingly volatile. It is not just gold that’s on the rise either, Silver and even Palladium are also doing well currently. I wouldn’t dare go on record saying that  2019 will see us readopting the Gold Standard, but that isn’t to say that it won’t either, in fact from my own vantage it seems more likely now than it ever has.

Further reading: