Elon Musk isn’t one to back down from a challenge, and he is proving that fact yet again in his ongoing attempt to purchase Twitter outright in a bid to restore freedom of speech to the internet. However, his bold move caused the establishment to put a target on his back. As of this week, both Biden’s Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) have reportedly opened new investigations into the billionaire Tesla founder, according to reports.
Earlier this week, Fox Business Senior Correspondent Charlie Gasparino broke the news of Biden’s alphabet agencies’ turning their sights on Musk in an appearance on ‘Cavuto: Coast to Coast.’ The longtime legal expert explained that as of right now, it is unclear what Musk has done that warrants the federal probes, but the Twitter takeover likely has a lot to do with it.
Gasparino pointed out that Musk has “stirred up a regulatory hornet’s nest” and the SEC is scrutinizing every little detail of his recent stock trades, looking to nab him on some small technicality.
“Both the DOJ and the SEC are clearly scrutinizing this entire matter. Now, we’re getting this from lawyers… they’re clearly monitoring and scrutinizing this entire issue – whether he filed the right forms, whether there’s a stock manipulation case here, whether he’s making public statements that he probably shouldn’t make… What we do know is that he’s stirred up a regulatory hornets’ nest. DOJ, SEC, I’m getting this from lawyers who deal with them.”
Gasparino followed up with more details in a tweet on Thursday:
“[Elon Musk] offers to buy the rest of [Twitter] a legal source tells [Fox Business] [SEC] and [DOJ] have launched what he described as a ‘joint investigation’ into a myriad of Musk regulatory issues primarily involving [Tesla}.”
Musk has gone toe to toe with the SEC in the past, calling it out publicly for filing a complaint against him after he tweeted about taking Tesla private in 2018. At that time, Musk fired back at the federal agency, saying that the action against him was “unjustified” and rejected any claims of wrongdoing completely.
Nevertheless, Musk eventually settled with the SEC, with both him and his company each paying a fine of $20 million in addition to some restrictions surrounding his public statements and his stepping down as the CEO of Tesla.
But this isn’t the same SEC or DOJ, and it isn’t the same type of dissent. This new “joint investigation” is that much more concerning if it takes place. Musk is taking a stand the establishment just can’t afford to let succeed.
Big tech, the legacy media, politicians in the DC swamp, and elites alike have resoundingly condemned Musk’s crusade because the success of their radical anti-American agenda relies completely on silencing the truths that contradict the approved narratives. Twitter itself is even jeopardizing its own financial prospects and betraying its shareholders in a desperate attempt to fend off the hostile takeover bid. Capitalists don’t turn down a free $10 billion dollars, which is what Musk offered over Twitter’s market value – radical ideologues focused on controlling people’s thoughts for the sake of their dystopian agenda do.
Without the ability for mass censorship of dissenting thoughts, which is what Twitter provides in excess, the propaganda would not have the same effect. The unhinged meltdown to condemn free speech by media elitists has exposed exactly how radical they truly are.
In just one example, the progressive activists at the LA Times said it outright: Musk buying the left’s most effective censorship tool would create “more freedom” and “less democracy.” ‘Democracy’ in this case means the (il)liberal world order, of course.
As Revolver News put it last week, “the world’s richest man might be on the cusp of launching a global crusade to restore freedom of speech” – so, naturally, the Biden regime and the sycophants in the media can’t just sit around and let it happen.
President Trump is requesting that the Clinton judge overseeing his Russiagate case be removed due to obvious conflicts of interest.
The corrupt liberal machine does not believe in addressing their obvious conflicts of interest. We saw it in the Russiagate nightmare. Corrupt FBI Director Jim Comey was fired and his good friend, former FBI Director Robert Mueller was assigned over his case.
The entire team that was put together under Mueller was a group of far-left nutty corrupt Hillary-loving and Trump-hating prosecutors and investigators. The entire investigation was a sham run by biased individuals who hated President Trump and who were on a mission to remove him from office.
President Trump recently sued a number of individuals for their actions related to the Russiagate sham nightmare that these corrupt Democrats and RINOs put America through. But somehow this case was assigned to a Bill Clinton appointed judge.
Now the President is moving that the courts replace the Clinton judge with someone who is not biased. The Washington Examiner reports:
Former President Donald Trump wants to remove the federal judge assigned to his lawsuit against Hillary Clinton, the Democratic National Committee, and others tied to the so-called “Russiagate” controversy.
Trump’s legal team filed a motion to disqualify U.S. District Court Judge Donald Middlebrooks, who is based in West Palm Beach, Florida, citing how the judge was nominated by former President Bill Clinton in 1997, when his spouse was the first lady.
The filing stresses that “there exists a reasonable basis that Judge Middlebrooks’ impartiality will be questioned” and notes the lawsuit is levied, in part, against Hillary Clinton, who ran an unsuccessful presidential campaign against Trump in 2016.
In addition, the motion cites Section 455 of the U.S. Code, which states, “Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.”
Trump’s filing does not make any mention of Middlebrooks’s decision in 2016 to toss a civil racketeering lawsuit against Clinton which alleged that the former secretary of state used her private email account and changed U.S. foreign policy to seek speaking fees and donations to the Clinton Foundation.
Conflicts of interest can be real or perceived. This conflict is real and perceived.
Forensic Deep Dive into the Bidens’ Ukrainian Blood Money. What the U.S. alphabet agencies andMainstream Media hid from the public.
On June 28, 2018, the Southern District of New York Court (Case 16-CR-371) convicted three individuals for security fraud. Most noteworthy was Devon Archer, Hunter Biden’s partner in Rosemont-Seneca-Bohai, LLC (“RSB”). The criminal investigation subpoenas obtained the banking and investment records of RSB documenting security fraud. The RSB financial records further revealed substantial payments from the private Ukrainian energy company known as Burisma Holdings Limited to Devon Archer and Hunter Biden.
Devon Archer and Hunter Biden were appointed to the Ukrainian Burisma board two months after the Coup d’état installedU.S. puppet Petro Poroshenko as Ukraine’s President. Not a mere coincidence since Vice President Joe Biden was Obama’s Ukraine point man. Neither Archer or Biden had expertise in oil and gas nor spoke the language. The RSB records revealed that each received $83,333.33 per month as director fees over two years.
Ukraine 2014 Coup d’état
After violent events associated with the Maidan revolution protests, Ukraine’s parliament ousted President Viktor Yanukovich in February 2014 and replaced him with Petro Poroshenko. Disposed Yanukovich was an existential threat because his amicable relations with Russia impeded Ukraine from becoming a European member and NATO from expanding to Russia’s border. Assistant U.S. Secretary of State Victoria Nuland, the midwife of Maidan, threatened sanctions against Ukraine’s government if President Viktor Yanukovych remained in office. (Over 100 people were killed in the protests.)
Assistant US Assistant Secretary of State for Victoria Nuland handing out cakes to Yanukovych protesters on the Independence Square in Kiev on December 10, 2013.
SDNY Instrument of the Deep State
The Southern District of New York Court (“SDNY”) is the most influential and controversial federal court. The SDNY has a reputation for being an apparatus of the Deep State. Louis Freeh and James Comey, former FBI Directors, served in the SDNY cesspool. The SDNY recently launched a high-profile federal criminal investigation of Rudy Giuliani, while he was serving as Trump’s legal counsel. At the time, Giuliani was encouraging former Ukrainian prosecutor Yuriy Lutsenko to investigate Joe and Hunter Biden. This action by the SDNY was a classic Saul Alinsky’s projection technique of false accusations.
Thanks to the criminal case, the public can now review (linked here) the bank and investment account statements (3/2014 – 5/2016) detailing the exorbitant extortion payments funding Archer’s and Biden’s lavish and decadent lifestyle. On the account statements lower left-hand corner, you will note that prosecuting attorneys labeled “FOIA Confidential Treatment Requested.”
RSB was a corporate shell for laundering funds with significant criminal transactions not associated with Burisma director fees flowing through the accounts.
Hunter Biden, at a minimum, was knowledgeable of the criminal transactions and is an unindicted co-conspirator. The mainstream media knew of the cases but was reluctant to publish information on these cases.
The following are three notable criminal transactions flowing through RSB accounts.
1 Fraudulent Bond Issuances
Devin Archer and co-conspirators engaged in a scheme where the Wakpamni Lake Community Corporation, a Native American tribal entity, issued a series of bonds totaling $60 million for tribal economic development. The bonds lacked a secondary market, were illiquid and sold to Hughes Capital Management passive investors. Archer and Co-Conspirator John Galanis controlled Hughes Capital. A portion of the funds was used for personal expenses, cars, and jewelry.
When pension clients that were clients of RBC learned about the purchase of the Tribal Bonds in their accounts, they demanded the liquidation of the bonds. Because there was no secondary market, $15 million in misappropriated proceeds funds were recycled through the RSB account. RSB purchased the clients’ bonds, creating an illusion of a liquid secondary market.
Page 53 – September 2014
Page 63 – October 2014
Page 62 – October 2014
Page 135 – April 2015
2 IPO Stock Fraud
Code Rebel Corporation (Nasdaq symbol CDRB), a technology company, went public in May 2015. Burnham Securities, Inc. (“BSI”) was the stock IPO underwriter. RSB deposited the stock certificate of 510,831 shares of the IPO (25.5% ownership), valued at $19.7 million, with Morgan Stanley.
Page 156 – June 2015
In October 2015, Devon Archer used RSB funds to loan the BSI working capital and had a contract to buy BSI’s holding company parent resulting in control over the Code Rebel’s stock market maker.
Page 190 – October 2015
By the end of 2015, Code Rebel reported a net income loss of $3.6 million, with the most significant expense component of $1.2 million for director fees. In May 2016, the company filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy. Nasdaq delisted the company in June 2016 due to insolvency and fraudulent audited financial statements.
Jason Galanis, a co-defendant with Archer in both security scandals, is known as the “New Porn King” after he acquired the nation’s largest payment processor for internet pornography.
3 Chinese Influence Peddling – Bohai Harvest
RSB invested in Bohai Harvest RST, a major Chinese state-owned venture capital, to buy or invest in a range of industries in China. The business relationship brought the Bidens’ into the orbit of the Chinese government, seeking and gaining influence with the Obama-Biden Administration.
The investment fund is estimated to be over $1 billion in assets. Hunter reported owning 10% for a nominal capital investment of $420,000 and recently cashed out his interest for an undisclosed amount. Below is a wire for investing in Bohai Harvest for $484,920.
Page 92 – 12/09/2014
Ukrainian Blood Money
The Obama-Biden Administration helped create instability in Ukraine, leading to a Mafia-like climate where potential Russian aggression leads to Ukraine demanding protection. Protection money is easily extorted, benefiting Hunter Biden and indirectly Joe Biden.
The ultimate price paid for the Obama-Biden Administration’s interference in destabilizing Ukraine politics is Russia responding using military force to annex Ukraine.
We are now 3 weeks deep into the 2020 post-election saga and there seems to be no end in sight. We have plenty of interesting information coming out regarding several Voting Software companies, their questionable origins, and the suspicious connections they have to certain politicians and Foundations. Alongside this, we have several stories to inspire you and give a taste of some huge changes to come.
Weekly Report #3 (The week of November 16th to 23rd 2020)
The fun doesn’t stop there, we’re seeing States continually flip-flopping, recounts being announced or denied, GOP caving to intimidation tactics, and election fraud lawsuits won at the local level being overturned at the state level.
It can be disheartening, especially to those hoping for instant gratification, but there is a silver lining: The Supreme Court.
It is very likely that the goal all along was for this mess to end up landing in the SCOTUS, all the while President Trump’s legal team is collecting evidence and building a case as things pass through the potentially corrupt lower courts. It’s pretty wild timing that this would all fall on the heels of the Amy Coney Barret confirmation.
Powell Doesn’t Work For Trump… Why This Isn’t Bad
Let’s open this week’s report with some hope about a situation that is worrying a lot of people: The announcement that Sidney Powell isn’t working directly for the Trump legal team.
As you might imagine, the deep state leftist media is blowing this way out of proportion, claiming that Powell is effectively a “conspiracy nutjob” and she has nothing to back her claims. The fact there is a lot of evidence already on the table is something the mainstream media (e.g. Tucker Carlson et al) is completely ignoring. But that’s not the point of this segment.
The point is that Powell not working for the Trump legal team is actually a good thing.
As someone who’s been studying the law for over 8 years, I can tell you that massive gaping holes of comprehension and understanding are at work at almost all levels of our society—the media is no exception. More to the point, the media is capitalizing on the fact most people don’t understand the legal process or how a strategy is needed to deal with lawfare tactics on the part of a corrupt system.
Without going into a detailed analysis, the key points are summarized quite well by a user of Voat in this post. I bolded the points that are the ones we should focus on.
For all you nancy boys getting your panties in a twist over the tweet about Sidney, I wrote this in a shill’s thread so it probably won’t get read. I’ll make a new thread for anyone who wants to discuss it in one spot.
This is my summary:
TLDR: This is not a big deal.
(1) In any civil lawsuit, there must be parties to the lawsuit, and they are called “parties in interest.” This means they have to have an interest in the lawsuit. The Plaintiff(s) must allege that a duty was breached by the Defendant(s). The Defendant(s) have to be served legal notice. This is what constitutes a “case” in court.
(2) The Plaintiff(s) must have “standing” (legal right) to sue. Since I do not live in Georgia, I could not file a case in Georgia regarding voter fraud or election fraud because I would not have standing. But someone in Georgia could. That is what Lin Wood did. He lives in Georgia. He is in the process of appealing the lower court’s ruling against him.
(3) Trump has legal standing because, even though he does not live in Georgia, he was a candidate on the ballot there, and if there was election fraud that cost him votes, he has standing to sue.
(4) Trump’s legal team represents HIM in court, regarding any case having to do with the election for which he was on the ballot.
(5) There are also OTHER parties who might bring lawsuits (in Georgia and elsewhere) that were NOT candidates on the ballot, but they DO live in Georgia and have been wronged in some way.
(6) These other people are likely who Powell will be representing. She can still coordinate with Trump’s legal team, even if she is not officially part of that team.
(7) It would be a good idea, given the circumstances, for Trump’s legal team to make a public statement that Powell is not officially part of their team, and any statements she makes are not part of their cases on behalf of Trump. That way, the opposition (or corrupt judges) can’t bring Powell’s statements into their cases. Powell is likely to be attacking from a different direction than Trump’s team.
In summary, Powell, as she stated yesterday, is representing We The People—a defender of the Republic, the rule of law, and the people of the US‚ and the world, by extension of her actions to protect the rule of law. Since everyone who voted has had their legal right to do so threatened, she is acting on behalf of the American people who voted.
Powell is likely going to represent voters in the jurisdictions where the fraud took place—which is the entire US—hence her suits are going to be federally filed, as she stated last week.
Just because she doesn’t work directly for the Trump campaign doesn’t mean her lawsuits and any evidence gathered by her has no validity. Quite the contrary. As an attorney with a license to litigate cases federally, the lawsuits she files are just as powerful as one filed by Rudy Guiliani, who is working for the Trump campaign.
Most importantly, as the Voat poster suggests, the corrupt judges might try to strike evidence from the record in a suit on some technicality, but the fact that Powell not working for them has been given on the public record (via the Guiliani and the Trump team) means that a clear distinction has been made.
All and all, the hope here is several-fold.
Trump is fighting the election fraud directly through his legal team, Guiliani et al.
The electoral process itself, the rule of law, and We The People (the electorate) are being represented by Sidney Powell.
The fraud that Powell and others are exposing has global ramifications because the same tactics are used in elections all over the world.
The media’s failure to report on the evidence that already exists, while misrepresenting the Guiliani statement about Powell not working for the Trump team is costing them even more credibility than they’ve already lost. Anytime a liar is exposed, this is a good thing. Arguably the biggest lairs in the game right now are the mainstream media.
In short, don’t believe the armchair skeptics and commenters who don’t know how to navigate the complexities of a legal process or give the efforts of Trump and the team around him credit where credit is due.
These things take time. Patience is key. And there’s plenty to be hopeful for.
In line with the above notion that the Trump plan to deal with election fraud is moving as expected, the following news broke last week.
The appeals process for circuit courts was changed last week, where 4 arguably pro-Trump SCOTUS judges were assigned to key areas currently being disputed by the Trump campaign. The hope here is that when appeals are made in suits that were dismissed related to alleged election fraud, judges loyal to the rule of law and the constitution will be on the bench. And that’s good news.
Currently, in the key remaining states, the deep-state actors are “certifying” their own fraud. Let’s take a look at how the situation is progressing in Wisconsin.
A federal lawsuit that had drawn nation-wide attention was dismissed on the 16th. The suit was filed by 3 voters, seeking to exclude 3 counties and nearly 800,000 votes that ended up swinging the count in favor of Biden (the same tactic we saw happen in Michigan).
Oddly enough, the plaintiffs requested the suit be dismissed on the 16th without giving any further comments. Court filings didn’t give a concrete reason why Michael Langenhorst, Michael LeMay, and Stephen Fifrick made the decision to dismiss the case, their attorneys were unwilling to divulge that information citing attorney-client privilege.
The campaign is set to request a recount after the final margin fell within the 1 percent margin required for an aggrieved candidate to request a recount. A recount of unofficial results in the state of Wisconsin would cost President Donald Trump $7.9 million upfront, the Wisconsin Elections Commission said Monday. Meagan Wolfe, Wisconsin’s chief elections official, says that the estimated cost of a statewide recount will be $7.9 million. The cost estimate was based on costs submitted by the state’s 72 counties. The last time a recount was conducted in Wisconsin, in 2016, it cost $2 million. Wolfe said the higher cost is due to conducting a recount during the pandemic.
If you’ve been paying attention to the election fiasco you’ve at least heard about Dominion Voting Systems and their possible bias toward the Democrats this election cycle. There is also intrigue concerning a company called Scytl, a Spanish provider of electronic voting systems and election technology, including allegations about a recent “raid” by the US Military on its servers in Germany. It’s apparent that something happened, the military was used but at whose behest? Were the Trump-friendly patriots trying to retrieve evidence or was it a deep-state attempt to cover something up?
Representative Louie Gohmert of Texas recently appeared on Newsmax to explain as much as he can about what was going on:
Incidentally, Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen’s Vulcan Capital has invested $40 million in Scytl. In addition to the raid on Scytl, Dominion Voting Systems connections are also being called into question after news broke about a former staffer of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif) being hired as a lobbyist for the company. The connections don’t end there, the company also has ties to Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) and the Clinton Foundation. Perhaps it’s all circumstantial, but at the very least it’s a severe conflict of interest that merits investigation.
Last week, the Colorado-based Dominion made a statement refuting any ties to another multinational voting systems corporation “Smartmatic” while admitting that the two firms worked together in the Philippines and said it bought some assets from Smartmatic-linked Sequoia about 10 years ago. The firm confirmed that it made a donation during a Clinton Global Initiative meeting in 2014, but it asserted that it has “no company ownership relationships with any member of the Pelosi family, the Feinstein family, or the Clinton Global Initiative, Smartmatic, Scytl, or any ties to Venezuela.”
The Associated Press could very well be covering or misdirecting public awareness, but even AP noted that former Pelosi Chief of Staff Nadeam Elshami “is part of a lobbying team representing Dominion, according to public disclosures,” adding that the team “includes Brian Wild, who counts Republicans such as former House Speaker John Boehner and former Vice President Dick Cheney among his past bosses.”
UPDATE – On Saturday night Newsmax White House correspondent Emerald Robinson tweeted this out:
In Other News
It appears that Amy Klobuchar and Elizabeth Warren, both Democratic senators, wrote letters in December of 2019 where they critiqued the integrity of election tech vendors, and questioned the reliability of their products, SPECIFICALLY mentioning DOMINION. This of course is proof of their unfairness, if they truly cared about the people over themselves they would join the chorus of individuals currently raising awareness.
This flip-floppy behavior isn’t exclusive to politicians. John Oliver, host of the TV talk show “Last Week Tonight”, has also expressed deep concerns about the integrity of the election process in November of 2019, ironically agreeing with his biggest target; US President Donald Trump, about election integrity and voting machine vulnerabilities. During the segment, Oliver had Rachel Tobac, the CEO of a cybersecurity company, Show his viewers how easily she could get unauthorized access to a voting machine on camera in less than two short minutes. Now that the spotlight is on Biden, John Oliver doesn’t seem to have anything further to say on the subject.
Sidney Powell has been making the rounds, appearing on-air and giving statements daily. She was set to appear on Tucker Carlson this week but after a phone call between them she decided not to go through with it. When later questioned during an appearance on Mornings with Maria Powell claimed that Tucker was “very insulting, demanding, and rude”.
In response to Powell, Carlson made a statement on his show Thursday evening saying that:
“We have no intention of fighting with her, We’ve always respected her work. We simply wanted to see the details. … We invited Sidney Powell on this show. We would’ve given her the whole hour; we would’ve given her the entire week actually and listened quietly the whole time at rapt attention — that’s a big story. But she never sent us any evidence despite a lot of requests, polite requests, not a page. When we kept pressing, she got angry and told us to stop contacting her.”
This is contrary to Powell’s statement, claiming that she had offered him access to a witness and an unfiled affidavit. Apparently that wasn’t enough for Tucker, who put forth the claim that Powell “could not provide evidence of claims”. Her response:
“I didn’t get angry with the request to provide evidence, In fact, I sent an affidavit to Tucker that I had not even attached to a pleading yet to help him understand the situation, and I offered him another witness who could explain the mathematics and statistical evidence far better than I can. I’m not really a numbers person. But he was very insulting, demanding, and rude and I told him not to contact me again in those terms.”
Naturally, there’s all kinds of speculation being flung around regarding the falling out, but no one knows for sure the full-picture view and the circumstances that created this situation. Could it all be optics? Was Tucker being intimidated or pressured to act a certain way? We know that Soros has money in everything, and Fox News is no exception. Here’s an excerpt of a piece from Breitbart:
Under the guise of seeking to “prevent a constitutional crisis,” a massive network of well funded left-wing activists and progressive groups are training, organizing, and planning to mobilize millions of Americans should President Trump “contest the election results,” refuse to concede, or claim an early victory.
More than 80 advocacy groups and grassroots organizations have joined in a broad coalition calling itself “Protect the Results” and proclaiming that “we cannot ignore the threat that Trump poses to our democracy and a peaceful transition of power.”
Both founding groups of the coalition (Indivisible and Stand up America) are part of the Soros-funded Democracy Alliance (DA), the largest network of donors dedicated to building the progressive movement in the U.S.
DA’s large body of donors aggregates resources for “focused investment,” marshalling as much as $80 million per year.
In 2017, DA developed a “resistance map” — a mix of anti-Trump groups it recommends its members donate to, many of which are now part of Protect the Results.
Other Soros-funded coalition groups include MoveOn, Women’s March, the Working Families Party and the Center for Popular Democracy, a network with over 50 local partners in 32 states, among many others.
This explains why Newt Gingrich was shut down after even mentioning his name on live television.
Ezra Coehn-Watnick Activated
Ezra Cohen-Watnick, who made headlines in 2017 for leaking intelligence that bolstered President Trump’s claims that Obama had him wiretapped, has been promoted to a top Defense Department post in the aftermath of Trump’s firing of Defense Secretary Mark Esper. It is worth noting that Ezra was formerly a National Security Aide to General Michael Flynn prior to being ousted. Take from that what you will.
Fighting Bogus Lockdown and Curfew
A few days ago, we reported on the Huntington Beach California protests against Governor Gavin Newsom’s totally unnecessary curfew for the state.
The protest was set to begin in a minute after the curfew was set to begin, intended as a form of civil disobedience.
Unlike protests earlier this year for George Floyd and Briana Taylor—that were violent and resulted in looting—no mass violence of lawlessness took place.
Protestors were playing music, displayed American flags, and—for the most part—moved out of the way of traffic.
Few masks could be seen by attendees.
But as we saw earlier this year, protests are a defacto way to avoid outrage for ignoring mask orders and social distancing commands—at least when it comes to Black Lives Matter.
The event lasted well into the night. Many Trump flags, American flags, and thin blue line flags could be seen.
Another smaller event took place in San Clemente.
They were apparently calling themselves Curfew Breakers.
Attorney Lin Wood, advisor to Trump’s legal team that’s fighting for the constitution and the legal process of the US election reminds us of something we should not forget.
His suggestion is not only a hopeful reminder, it’s logically sound.
Trump is very intelligent. He was well aware of election fraud and spoke about it in 2012
Trump’s had some of the greatest minds supporting him over the past 4 years.
While it might seem like everything is lost, keep in mind, a conman’s greatest trick is to make you believe in his lie.
They’ll pound it into your head. They’ll make everyone echo it. They’ll make you think you’re crazy for believing the truth. But the truth doesn’t stop being true just because a bunch of people gave up on it.
Do you really think that one of the greatest negotiating minds in history, who managed to broker peace deals across the globe, beat the Clinton corruption machine in 2016, defeat a bogus impeachment, defeat the China virus with minimal death and destruction, and restore the economy, twice, didn’t see this coming?
The “biblical” nature of what we’re seeing unfold right now is no accident. The “money changers” have to be seen for what they are before the people stop going to them to get their coins exchanged.
A man rescued his dog that was pulled into the water by an alligator.
Praying Medic’s caption fits quite well.
Dave Hayes, the man behind the moniker Praying Medic, also had this to say about Powell’s evidence.
I think he’s right.
A Hint of Sweeping Changes to Come
There are several major developments happening that I’m extremely excited to talk about. But these changes won’t mean much to most people because there’s a major conceptual language barrier in place. In an effort to address that barrier consider the following.
What does this mean?
Read this and think carefully. I’ll have more to reveal soon.
As long as you can detach from the mainstream narrative, there is plenty of hope to be had.
Trump’s legal team (Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn included) have been spotted in public recently and they do not appear to be under stress.
Trump attorney Jenna Ellis posted this late-night photo of herself with former Mayor of New York City and lead Trump elections attorney Rudy Giuliani and Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn (US Army Ret.) who was President Trump’s first national security advisor.
One can’t help but wonder what a non-attorney like Flynn is doing hanging out with the President’s election attorneys so late at night. Perhaps he stopped by to give a morale boost.
Or perhaps the former head of the Defense Intelligence Agency under President Obama and former Trump national security advisor is lending his expertise in national security and intelligence to Trump’s legal team? Nothing can stop what is coming.
The next day President Trump’s legal team held a press conference outlining their case. Guiliani claimed that there was a pattern to the irregularities, suggesting a “plan from a centralized place” to commit voter fraud in certain democrat cities. We’ve reported on so many instances of voter fraud that it’s been practically impossible to keep track of them all, luckily at the press conference the team listed the key allegations that will fuel the case:
Observers were allegedly prevented from watching mail-in ballots being opened. Giuliani said that many mail-in ballots were opened without observers being able to check that they were properly signed, a key protection against fraud. Those votes, he said, were “null and void,” especially where the envelopes had been discarded, making recounts useless.
Allegedly unequal application of the law in Democratic counties. In Pennsylvania, whose state supreme court created new, relaxed voting rules before the election, Giuliani alleged that absentee voters in Democratic counties were allowed to “cure” defects in their ballots, while voters in Republican counties, which obeyed the state law as written, were not.
Voters allegedly arrived at the polls to discover other people had voted for them. Giuliani said that many provisional ballots cast in Pittsburgh were submitted by people who showed up to vote in person, only to be told that they had voted already. He alleged that Democrats had filled out absentee ballots for other people, hoping they would not show up.
Election officials were allegedly told not to look for defects in ballots, and to backdate ballots. Giuliani cited an affidavit from an official who swore she was told not to exclude absentee ballots for defects, and to backdate ballots so they would not appear to have been received after Election Day, to avoid a Supreme Court order to sequester those ballots.
Ballots casting votes for Joe Biden and no other candidates were allegedly run several times through machines. Giuliani said that there were 60 witnesses in Michigan who would attest to ballots being “produced” quickly and counted twice or thrice. He said that a minimum of 60,000 ballots, and a maximum of 100,000 ballots, were allegedly affected.
Absentee ballots were accepted in Wisconsin without being applied for first. Giuliani noted that Wisconsin state law was stricter regarding absentee ballots than most other states are, yet alleged that 60,000 absentee ballots were counted in the Milwaukee area, and 40,000 in the Madison area, without having been applied for properly by the voters who cast them.
There were alleged “overvotes,” with some precincts allegedly recording more voters than residents, among other problems. Giuliani said there was an unusually large number of overvotes in precincts in Michigan and in Wisconsin, which he alleged was the reason that Republicans on the Wayne County Board of Canvassers had refused to certify the results there this week. He also alleged that there were some out-of-state voters in Georgia, and people who had cast votes twice there.
Voting machines and software are allegedly owned by companies with ties to the Venezuelan regime and to left-wing donor George Soros. Sidney Powell argued that U.S. votes were being counted overseas and that Dominion voting machines and Smartmatic software were controlled by foreign interests, manipulating algorithms to change the results. Powell noted specifically that Smartmatic’s owners included two Venezuelan nationals, whom she alleged had ties to the regime of Hugo Chavez and Nicolas Maduro. The legal team alleged that there were statistical anomalies, such as huge batches of votes for Biden, that could not be explained except as manipulation — which, they alleged, happened in the wee hours of the morning as vote-counting had stalled. (The companies have disputed these allegations vigorously.)
The Constitution provides a process for electing a president if the vote is corrupted. Jenna Ellis argued that the media had usurped the power to declare the winner of the election. She made the point, citing Federalist No. 68, that the constitutional process of selecting a president had procedural safeguards against corruption and foreign influence.
A quick youtube search will turn up a boatload of videos filled with manipulative slant, bad comedians using what feels like the tactics of a typical middle-school bully, well-groomed corporate pundits making fun of Giuliani and his hair dye instead of unpacking his claims. One of the few places you can watch the press conference is provided below.
This gruesome, trainwreck of an election isn’t the only battle being fought, perhaps the most important (but little-reported on) point of concern is the “Great Economic Reset”. The reset is something that alt-financial analysts and conspiracy theorists have been talking about for years, and it seems inevitable. What is still undecided though, is who will be in control of this reset. Will it be the usual handful of Globalists or a transnational union of patriots from all nations? It’s impossible to say though it appears the Central Bank’s opposition is using this transformative moment in time as an opportunity to wrestle control from the establishment.
The Deep-State affiliated world leaders are touting the Great Reset as expected, and the COVID crisis seems to be the perfect way to condition the people to become accepting through fear, propaganda, and neuro-linguistic programming (“the new normal”). It probably appears to be set in stone for those who still trust Big-Tech and the Mainstream Media, but many believe Trump and company have been planning and plotting all along. Evidence of this includes the absorption of the Federal Reserve into the United States Treasury to produce stimulus, helping out Mainstreet instead of wall street. Essentially, instead of simply dismantling it all he’s using the CB’s magic money printing wand and the illusionary economic system to transition into a new system that would be the antithesis of what the Deep-State is trying to bring about with its Great Reset. In response to Trump’s maneuverings, they’ve been very actively trying to bring down the economy, but he counters them every time with their own weapons. The Deep-State players attack the economy, Trump uses the Fed to pump money back into it. The corporate media parrots have been singing about another great depression every few weeks yet it never comes. Why is that? Because the Patriots are in control.
If you feel this newsletter was helpful in understanding the current situation then please share far and wide as the big tech platforms and the mainstream media echo-chamber has no desire to report anything beyond what benefits them and the financial elite.
Hope is all around us if we dare to embrace the truth with a whole heart and discerning mind.
Donald Trump is not the first president to face down a deep-state cabal, that is, an unelected oligarchy of shadowy figures who wielded enormous power while being unaccountable to the American public. The first was President Andrew Jackson, who faced down the Bank of the United States in the 1820s and 1830s; then as now, the deep state has apparently included a significant financial element. Trump’s top economic aide Lawrence Kudlow said it last October: “I don’t want to get into a lot of Fed bashing,” but “their models are highly flawed. The deep state board staff, of course, has not been very helpful — oops, did I say that?”
Yes, he did. And whatever the actual role of the Federal Reserve in the coup attempt against Trump, there is no doubt that some have been sounding warnings about it since at least 1931 – people in a position to know.
As Rating America’s Presidents: An America-First Look at Who Is Best, Who Is Overrated, and Who Was An Absolute Disaster explains, the Federal Reserve was established in December 1913, during the “progressive” Woodrow Wilson administration. But the Fed was just a new version of the same Bank of the United States that Jackson fought: a private corporation that kept the public treasury. Its foes argued that it was dangerous to turn power over the public funds to an oligarchy of private financiers, since the possibility for corruption, and for a de facto second government developed by buying favors until large enough to challenge the government of the United States, was immense.
Yet as far as Wilson was concerned, that was by design. Late in the presidency of Theodore Roosevelt, the Knickerbocker Trust Company was failing, leading to a significant economic downturn, the Panic of 1907. Banking baron J. P. Morgan stepped in to aid banks that were failing and thus minimize the crisis. Wilson, at that time the president of Princeton University, showed a taste for authoritarian government, writing: “All this trouble could be averted if we appointed a committee of six or seven public-spirited men like J. P. Morgan to handle the affairs of our country.”
In establishing the Federal Reserve System, the nation went a long way toward doing just that. Wilson’s support for it contradicted his assurances during his 1912 campaign that he was opposed to a central bank. He declared:
A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is privately concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men who, even if their action be honest and intended for the public interest, are necessarily concentrated upon the great undertakings in which their own money is involved and who necessarily, by very reason of their own limitations, chill and check and destroy genuine economic freedom.
Yet Wilson’s opposition to a central bank proved to be as hollow a claim as Wilson’s reelection slogan, “He Kept Us out of War,” would prove to be when the U.S. entered World War I on the flimsiest of pretexts. The Federal Reserve Act placed various regional Federal Reserve banks in private hands, controlled by a central board that was appointed by the president. The central board was supposed to prevent the growth of a moneyed oligarchy that would exercise undue control over the American political process, which was exactly what Jackson and Tyler had decried about the nineteenth-century bank.
But the board itself came to be dominated by those oligarchs, and once again, the public funds were in the control of a small number of people who had not been elected by the American people. If anyone was responsible for an enormous concentration of power “in the hands of a few men,” it was Wilson.
Rating America’s Presidents recounts that no less a luminary than William Gibbs McAdoo, who was Wilson’s treasury secretary when the Federal Reserve came into existence, sounded the alarm about the Federal Reserve in his memoirs, which were published in 1931. Wrote McAdoo: “The fact is that there is a serious danger of this country becoming a plutodemocracy; that is, a sham republic with the real government in the hands of a small clique of enormously wealthy men, who speak through their money, and whose influence, even today, radiates to every corner of the United States.” For this, he could thank Wilson and the Federal Reserve Act.
That’s the same danger the U.S. faces today: becoming a sham republic with the real government in the hands of a small clique. It is because Donald Trump stands in between that clique and unchallenged hegemony that he is so fervently hated today.
President Donald Trump on Sunday hailed recent disclosures of information regarding government surveillance of the Trump campaign, saying that it has afforded him a chance to “break” the so-called “deep state.”
In an interview with journalist Sharyl Attkisson, Trump suggested that additional information is going to come out about the surveillance efforts.
“Other things are going to come out, too. And a lot of other things are going to come out, but you don’t even need other things,” he said.
“I would like to see it move much faster,” Trump added.
Trump went on to accuse the “deep state” of trying to derail his presidency through the investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian government.
“If it keeps going the way it’s going, I have a chance to break the deep state,” Trump said.
“It’s a vicious group of people. It’s very bad for our country. And that’s never happened before.”
Trump called former FBI Director James Comey a “dirty cop,” and former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe a “bad guy.”
Trump praised Richard Grenell, the acting director of national intelligence, for declassifying and releasing a slew of documents related to investigations of the Trump campaign.
“Richard Grenell is a superstar. He had guts, he had courage to do what he did,” Trump said.
He also said he has high hopes for Texas Rep. John Ratcliffe, who takes over for Grenell on Tuesday.
“We have another superstar going in as you know, John Ratcliffe.”
In April, Grenell declassified footnotes from a Justice Department inspector general’s report which showed that the FBI had evidence in 2017 that Russian intelligence operatives fed disinformation to Christopher Steele, the author of the anti-Trump dossier.
Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact email@example.com.
The Deep State propaganda machine is spinning at hyperdrive. You are being repeatedly told that unmasking is common. Nothin’ unusual here. Move along. Reminds me of the scene from the Naked Gun when faux detective Frank Drebin tried to tell people they were not seeing what they were seeing:
Leave it to lying Jimmy Clapper to pop up as one of the prevaricators eager to feed a false meme to a gullible public. He is caught up in the unmasking with his metaphorical pants down around his ankles and his hideous junk exposed–simply put, Clapper spied on Michael Flynn. Here is Clapper’s pathetic attempt to put lipstick on this crooked pig:
Former Director of National Intelligence (DNI) James Clapper said Thursday it is “routine” to “unmask” American citizens who have been caught up in surveillance of foreign individuals as Republicans spark an uproar over allegations that officials spied on former national security adviser Michael Flynn.
Clapper and other apologists are counting on your ignorance of intelligence community processes and procedures for collecting intelligence.
What I find shocking is that there are thousands of intelligence professionals who understand that Clapper is spewing total bullshit but, because of their hatred of Donald Trump, stay silent and allow Clapper’s lies to go unchallenged.
Let us start with the basics. The document that Acting DNI Grenell declassified last week regarding the “unmasking” of Michael Flynn gives us only the names and dates that requests were made to the NSA. But those requests came in response to a NSA intelligence report or document that the requestors had read. That means finished intelligence.
The following is an example of the formatting and content of the type of NSA messages that the Obama people were reading when they encountered an “unnamed” American citizen and just had to know who it was.
The type of message that had Michael Flynn’s name carried the following classification headers (if you click on the link it will take you to a very interesting NSA document that addresses the whole issue of spying on Americans):
Next you get the Message report number, in this case it is SERIAL 3/00/532318-12, and the the sender and addressee information. In the image immediately below, DIRNSA refers to the Director of NSA, “COS KINGSTON” is the CIA Chief in Kingston, Jamaica. Note that other agencies such as DEA, DIA, FAA and even INTERIOR are sent copies of this message.
Next comes the content. It is vital that you understand that this type of report is not just the raw take–i.e., an unedited transcript of the conversation with no commentary. The reports that inspired the readers to ask for the name of the unnamed American were produced in response to specific collection requirements. If you have never worked in the intelligence field, you probably have the false notion that intelligence collectors wake up each morning, scan news headlines for the sexiest, most provocative stories and then decide that is the information they will collect for that day. Nope. Does not work that way at all. It is a very bureaucratic process.
NSA, unlike CIA, scoops up all electronic communications, such emails, phone calls, text messages. The volume of “take” is so gargantuan that most of the information is never processed or analyzed. The initial scrubbing comes via computer systems and algorithms designed to weed out wheat from chaff. But at some point that intelligence gets into the hands of an analyst. The decision about what to publish and analyze normally is based on collection plans. A collection plan is a list of priority issues or persons that the Director of National Intelligence, acting on behalf of the President, uses to tell the specific intelligence agencies–NSA and CIA in particular–what they need to collect.
Let me give you a specific example from own experience. In the aftermath of the bombing of the Israeli Embassy in Buenos Aires in March 1992, I led an interagency US Government team to the region to discuss terrorist threats and upgrading aviation security. While at our Embassy in Buenos Aires, we had a sit-down with the Chief of Station–Bill. I told Bill that the only intel we had seen at that point of time was from a liaison service and indicated that Hezbollah was behind the attack. I asked Bill if they were having any luck going after Hezbollah.
Bill’s answer stunned me–he said “no, it was not part of the collection plan.” In Bill’s world (and that of other intel community bureaucrats operating as intel collectors), your annual evaluation determines whether you get promoted and make more money. A key part of that evaluation, especially for a Chief of Station, is measuring how well you did in providing the sources and reports that met the priorities identified in the collection plan. You did not get praised or rewarded by diverting intelligence resources to an issue or target not on the collection plan. Since Hezbollah was not on the plan when the bomb went off in Buenos Aires, the CIA was not collecting intel or trying to recruit sources to get such intel. The intel the U.S. Government was getting on Hezbollah in South America was coming to us from other governments.
I returned to Washington, DC and wrote Hezbollah in South America as a collection priority, it was added subsequently to the overall collection plan. Never forget that bureaucratic processes and procedures reign supreme in both the intel and FBI worlds.
I want you to look at the list of the people who unmasked Flynn in the aftermath of the 2016 election and look specifically at the number of separate reports that contained Flynn’s name. Thirty nine separate people asked 14 different days for the NSA to tell them the identity of the “unnamed” American cited in the intelligence report he or she was reading. In response to those requests Michael Flynn’s name was revealed or “unmasked” to those 39 people.
The document declassified by DNI Grenell shows that there were 14 unique days when the NSA received requests to “unmask”–the first was on 30 November 2016 by UN Ambassador Samantha Power and the last came on 12 January from Joe Biden. There were two separate requests on the 14th of December by Samantha Power, which indicates two separate NSA reports. Samantha Power would not have to submit two requests for the same document.
The documents that had the name of Michael Flynn were formal NSA intelligence reports. They were purposefully created either in response to a U.S. intelligence community collection plan or were produced by a foreign intelligence outfit, in this particular case an organization like the British version of the NSA–the GCHQ. GCHQ could easily identify Michael Flynn or anyone else tied to the Trump team as a valid target for collection. Signals or communication intelligence collected by the Brits from targeting Michael Flynn would be put into a British intelligence report and then passed to the NSA. NSA officers are co-located in the UK with GCHQ. There is no prohibition on the NSA accepting “liaison” reporting from GCHQ and then disseminating it people with appropriate clearances throughout the U.S. Government.
Here is an example of the kind of report that one of the people wanting to unmask Michael Flynn might have seen:
After reading this report you want to know, “who are the redacted names?” That is how an unmasking request starts.
What is so unusual and bizarre is that there are at least 14 different NSA intelligence reports with Michael Flynn’s name popping up in a 45 day period. That is not accidental or incidental. If you are driving down the road and your car breaks down and you go to a nearby bar to call for a tow and see your pastor in the bar with your neighbor’s wife, that is accidental or incidental intelligence collection.
What happened to Michael Flynn is akin to the jealous husband hiring a private investigator to follow his wife and find out who she is sleeping with. That is not incidental. That is purposeful.
The intelligence collection and creation of intelligence reports in the NSA were not incidental nor accidental. It was done with a purpose and with the help of foreign intelligence.
As I noted in an earlier article, the fact that Michael Flynn’s December 29 conversation with the Russian Ambassador is missing from this list could have been because the material was before a Grand Jury and/or it was collected by the CIA. Thanks to Andy McCarthy’s explanation, the Grand Jury explanation is probably not valid. That leaves the CIA, which means John Brennan’s CIA did it using something like the Special Collection Service. Ed Snowden described capability in his book:
“I remember sitting on the left bank of Lake Geneva with the local personnel of the SCS, or Special Collection Service, a joint CIA-NSA program responsible for installing and operating the special surveillance equipment that allows US embassies to spy on foreign signals. These guys worked down the hall from my vault at the embassy, but they were older than I was, and their work was not just way above my pay grade but way beyond my abilities—they had access to NSA tools that I didn’t even know existed.”
The people in the intelligence and law enforcement community, current and former, that were spying on Donald Trump and his team want you to believe that nothing untoward or wrong was done. That is the ultimate lie. I hope the preceding explanations help you see that fact.
Is the coronavirus being used as a part of a Deep State takedown operation, coordinated by whitehats or positive forces that have infiltrated the NWO cabal criminal syndicate network? Rumors continue to circulate that the Covid-19 pandemic is indeed being used to take down the Cabal.
Before we review the evidence, it should be clearly stated that any hardship suffered by those affected by the coronavirus is real and should be taken seriously.
While there is a plausible case to be made for the fact the coronavirus is having a positive effect insofar as assisting an alliance in taking down the deep state, I’m not suggesting this same alliance intentionally released the deadly virus.
1 Whitehat Alliance to Takedown the Deep State
To set the stage for this, let’s first consider The Storm.
QAnon is an alleged positive military operation tasked with taking down the Deep State. Despite the fact, the media continue to paint Q as nothing more than a conspiracy theory, proof after proof of the operations efforts continue to be made.
Assuming that The Storm is active, let’s look at the news.
2 The Recession of the Global Economy
The coronavirus is having a major impact on various aspects of the global power structure.
The Guardian just released an article this morning warning about a global recession.
What initially seemed localised is worldwide and economic pain will go on for longer than first thought
Travel bans. Sporting events cancelled. Mass gatherings prohibited. Stock markets in freefall. Deserted shopping malls. Get ready for the Covid-19 global recession.
Up until a month ago this seemed far-fetched. It was assumed that the coronavirus outbreak would be a localised problem for China and that any spillover effects to the rest of the world could be comfortably managed by a bit of policy easing by central banks.
When it became clear that Covid-19 was not confined to China and that the economic effects would be more widespread, forecasts started to be revised down. But central banks, finance ministries and independent economists took comfort from the fact that there would be a sharp but short hit to activity followed by a rapid return to business as usual.
This line of thinking has exact parallels with the events of 2007, when it was initially assumed that the subprime mortgage crisis was a minor and manageable problem affecting only the US – and nobody needs reminding how that ended.
If history is any guide, the global economy will eventually recover from the Covid-19 pandemic, but the idea that this is going to be a V-shaped recession in the first half of 2020 followed by a recovery in the second half of the year looks absurd after the tumultuous events of the past week.
What’s more, policymakers know as much. The Federal Reserve – the US central bank – does not need to be told by Donald Trump that it needs to cut interest rates and resume large-scale asset purchases known as quantitative easing. Wall Street is looking to the Fed to pull out all the stops when it meets on Wednesday and the world’s most powerful central bank cannot afford to disappoint.
The economic turmoil is hitting every country, particularly those dependent on Chinese products. With these supply lines cut, Deep State actors could be deprived of resources they need to further their insidious agenda. But at this stage, we can’t make any definitive conclusions as to whether the supply lines have indeed been cut.
3 The Slowdown of the Globalist Agenda
Paul Joseph Watson reports in another clue, that Philippe Legrain, founder of the Open Political Economy Network (OPEN) said that the spread of COVID-19 “has been a gift to nativist nationalists and protectionists.” Translate that to mean… “it has been a gift to those who are against the globalist agenda.”
Legrain claims that coronavirus could be “the nail in the coffin for the current era of globalization” because it has “highlighted the downsides of extensive international integration while fanning fears of foreigners and providing legitimacy for national restrictions on global trade and flows of people.”
Globalization is a major component of the NWO agenda, wherein national sovereignty is eroded in favor of a technocratic global governance scheme.
The fact that the globalist agenda is being hindered by the coronavirus is arguably a piece of very good news.
In his latest column, conservative icon Pat Buchanan also highlights how coronavirus has served to expose the weaknesses of globalization.
“It may one day be said that the coronavirus delivered the deathblow to the New World Order, to a half-century of globalization and to the era of interdependence of the world’s great nations,” writes Buchanan.
4 World’s Wealthy Have Lost $1 Trillion Due to Covid-19
According to Bloomberg, the “World’s Richest Nearing $1 Trillion Wipeout in 2020 Rout.”
From New York to Paris, Sao Paulo to Hong Kong the losses are unprecedented for the world’s wealthiest.
The world’s 500 richest people collectively lost $331 billion on Thursday, the biggest one-day drop in the eight-year history of the Bloomberg Billionaires Index. That pushed the group’s year-to-date losses to $950 billion.
This week’s collapse marks the end of a decade of soaring markets and cheap money that helped the planet’s wealthiest people amass a record $6.1 trillion less than two months ago. Those gains were obliterated over the past four days as pandemic fears and plunging oil prices sent markets into a nosedive.
Since the first of the year the world’s richest have lost 16% of their collective net worth, according to the index. The market meltdown has slammed billionaires from every part of the globe and every industry.
“People right now are afraid,” said Charles Doraine, president of Doraine Insurance Group and a former wealth manager. “Things are being introduced to the world of investing that have never been there before — health risks. This is stuff beyond the market’s normal fears and concerns.”
The anxieties of the super rich are evidenced by a spike in demand for private jets, canceled charity galas and an exodus to secluded second homes. Global measures to limit the spread of Covid-19 have introduced restrictions rarely experienced by a globe-trotting elite for whom access and services are seldom constrained. On Thursday, wealthy travelers scrambled to book private flights to the U.S. from Europe ahead of President Donald Trump’s recently-announced travel restrictions.
And of course, the Deep State-run media is using the pandemic as an excuse to rage against Trump:
Trump’s rhetoric-laden address to the nation on Wednesday evening did little to calm investors, contributing to a further slide in stocks and trimming the wealth of some of his major supporters.
The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic is only beginning to be revealed.
Regardless of what the truth is, the opportunity presented to humans can’t be overlooked. By this, I mean, the hardship people are experiencing due to panic and global economic fallout is real. And this hardship provides a chance for us to gain unity to support each other, and in doing so, form the human bonds of fellowship that will make gaining freedom from the cabal all that more attainable.
If you have any other signs you want to add to this article, let us know in the comments.
Stay vigilant friends!
The Storm is here. And we, with the truth as our guide, will bring stillness and peace.
In this country, reactions to the Mueller report have been all-American beyond belief. Let’s face it, when it comes to election meddling, it’s been me, me, me, 24/7 here. Yes, in some fashion some set of Russians meddled in the last election campaign, whether it was, as Jared Kushner improbably claimed, “a couple of Facebook ads” or, as the Mueller report described it, “the Russian government interfer[ing]… in sweeping and systematic fashion.”
But let me mention just a few of the things that we didn’t learn from the Mueller report. We didn’t learn that Russian agents appeared at Republican Party headquarters in 2016 with millions of dollars in donations to influence the coming election. (Oops, my mistake! That was CIA agents in the Italian election of 1948!) We didn’t learn that a Russian intelligence agency in combination with Chinese intelligence, aided by a major Chinese oil company, overthrew an elected U.S. president and installed Donald Trump in the White House as their autocrat of choice. (Oops, my mistake again! That was the CIA, dispatched by an American president, and British intelligence, with the help of the Anglo-Persian Oil Company, later BP. In 1953, they overthrew Mohammad Mossadegh, the elected prime minister of Iran, and installed the young Shah as an autocratic ruler, the very first – but hardly the last – time the CIA successfully ousted a foreign government.) We didn’t learn that key advisers to Russian President Vladimir Putin were in close touch with rogue elements of the U.S. military preparing to stage a coup d’état in Washington, kill President Barack Obama in a direct assault on the White House, and put the head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff in office. (Sorry, again my slip-up and full apologies! That was President Richard Nixon’s adviser Henry Kissinger in contact with Chilean military officers who, on September 11, 1973 – the first 9/11 – staged an armed uprising during which Salvador Allende, the democratically elected socialist president of that country, died and army commander-in-chief Augusto Pinochet took power.) We didn’t learn that, at the behest of Vladimir Putin, Russian secret service agents engaged in a series of plots to poison or in some other fashion assassinate Barack Obama during his presidency and, in the end, had at least a modest hand in encouraging those who did kill him after he left office. (Oh, wait, I was confused on that one, too. I was actually thinking about the plots, as the 1960s began, to do in Congolese Prime Minister Patrice Lumumba.) Nor, for that matter, did we learn that the Russian military launched a regime-change-style invasion of this country to unseat an American president and get rid of our weapons of mass destruction and then occupied the country for years after installing Donald Trump in power. (Sorry one more time! What I actually had in mind before I got so muddled up was the decision of the top officials of President George W. Bush’s administration, in the wake of the 9/11 attacks, to launch a “regime-change” invasion of Iraq in 2003, based on fraudulent claims that Iraqi despot Saddam Hussein was developing weapons of mass destruction, and install a government of their choice in Baghdad.)
No, none of that happened here. Still, even though most Americans might find it hard to believe, we weren’t exactly the first country to have an election meddled with by an intrusive foreign power with an agenda all its own! And really, my examples above just begin an endless list of events the Mueller report didn’t mention, ones that most Americans no longer know anything about or we wouldn’t have acted as if the Russian election intervention of 2016 stood essentially alone in history.
I don’t, however, want that to sound like blame. After all, if you lived in the United States in these years and didn’t already know the secret history of American intervention and regime change across the globe from the end of World War II to the collapse of the Soviet Union, you could be forgiven for thinking that never had anyone done anything quite so dastardly as did the Putin regime in attempting to hack and alter the results of an American election. In the media, that Russian intervention has (with the rarest of exceptions) been covered as if it were an event unique in history. Admittedly, whatever the Russians did do in 2016 to lend a hand to Donald Trump, they didn’t plan a coup d’état; it wasn’t an assassination attempt; and it wasn’t, in the normal sense, what has come to be known as “regime change.”
A World of Chaos Without End
Let’s start with one thing that should have been (but wasn’t) obvious since the first reports on Russian meddling in the election campaign of 2016 began to appear. Historically speaking, such a plan fits well with a classic Russian tradition. As scholar Dov Levin discovered in studying “partisan election interventions” from 1946 to 2000, the Russians – the Soviet Union until 1991 – engaged in a staggering 36 of them globally.
If, however, you jumped to the conclusion that such an impressive cumulative figure gave the Russians the world’s record for election meddling, think again. In fact, it left them languishing in a distant second place when it came to interfering in other countries’ elections over more than four decades. The United States took the crown with, by Levin’s count, a distinctly imperial 81 interventions! (USA! USA!)
Put another way, the two Cold War superpowers together meddled in approximately “one of every nine competitive elections” in that era in at least 60 countries covering every part of the planet but Oceania. Moreover, only seven of them were in the same election in the same country at the same time.
And elections are but one part of a story of meddling on a scale that has been historically remarkable. In her book Covert Regime Change, Lindsey O’Rourke notes that between 1947 and 1989, a span of nine Cold War-era American administrations, the least number of “U.S.-backed regime-change attempts” per president was three (Gerald Ford’s administration), the most 30 (Dwight D. Eisenhower’s). Harry Truman’s administration came in second with 21, Lyndon Johnson’s third with 19, Ronald Reagan’s fourth with 16, John F. Kennedy’s fifth with 15, and Richard Nixon’s sixth with 10.
And keep in mind that, while such numbers remain unprecedented, despite a number of short-term successes from Iran to Guatemala, this was not generally a notable record of success in remaking the world in the image Washington desired. Many of those regime-change attempts, especially against countries in the Soviet bloc, failed dismally. Others created chaos or regimes that not only did their citizens little good but didn’t end up doing much for Washington either. Still, that didn’t stop one administration after another from trying, which is why the numbers remain mind-boggling.
And then the Soviet Union imploded and there was but a “sole” superpowerleft on Planet Earth. Its leaders had no doubt that its ultimate moment had come and it was to be no less than “the end of history”! The planet was obviously Washington’s for the taking. No more need for subterfuge, subtle election meddling, secret support for dissidents, or even covert regime change, not when the only opposition to an American planet was a few weak “rogue states” (think: the “axis of evil,” also known as Iran, Iraq, and North Korea), a desperately weakened and impoverished but still nuclear-armed Russia, and a modestly rising future power in Asia.
And then, of course, came 9/11, that staggering act of blowback – in part from one of the great “successes” of CIA covert action in the Cold War, the decisive defeat of the Red Army in Afghanistan thanks to the funding and arming of a set of extremist Islamist militants, a war in which a young Saudi named Osama bin Laden gained a certain modest reputation. On that day in 2001, the last superpower, the one exceptional nation, became the planet’s greatest victim and all hell was let loose (just as bin Laden hoped it would be).
In response, in a world without other superpowers, the country with, as one president proudly put it, “the finest fighting force that the world has ever known” no longer needed to meddle secretly (or at least in a fashion that allowed for “plausible deniability”). With the invasion of Afghanistan that October, open regime change became the order of the day. Iraq would come in 2003, Libya in 2011. The U.S. Air Force and the CIA’s drones would bomb and missile at least seven countries across the Greater Middle East and North Africa repeatedly in the years to come, helping reduce great cities to rubble, uprooting and displacing massive numbers of people, creating failed statesgalore, and setting in motion forces that, from Pakistan to Syria, Yemen to Niger, would in turn unsettle a significant part of the planet.
And, of course, it would all prove to be a militarized failure of the first order. And yet, with a potential new conflict ramping up in Iran and the U.S. still fighting in Afghanistan almost 18 years later, America’s wars show little sign of winding down. Only recently, for instance, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff assured a group of senators that the American military would “need to maintain a counterterrorism presence as long as an insurgency continues in Afghanistan,” which should be considered the very definition of a forever war. Think of it as a world of chaos without end and now consider again that Russian meddling in an American election.
By the way, whatever the Russians did in 2016 (or may do in the future to American or other elections) is deplorable and should be denounced, no matter how slapdash it might have been. After all, as Dov Levin discovered, it doesn’t necessarily take much to affect the result of an election in another country. Here’s his conclusion for election meddling in the Cold War era:
“I find that an electoral intervention in favor of one of the sides contesting [an] election has a statistically significant effect, increasing its vote share by about 3%. Such an effect can have major ‘real life’ implications. For example, such a swing in the vote share from the winner to the loser in the 14 U.S. presidential elections occurring since 1960 would have been sufficient to change the identity of the winner in seven of these elections.”
As we all know, a 3% shift in the 2016 election in several states would have made a staggering difference. After all, as the Washington Postreported, in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, Donald Trump beat Hillary Clinton by “0.2, 0.7, and 0.8 percentage points, respectively – and by 10,704, 46,765, and 22,177 votes. Those three wins gave him 46 electoral votes; if Clinton had done one point better in each state, she’d have won the electoral vote, too.”
So the issue isn’t faintly whether Russian electoral meddling was despicable or not. The issue is that it’s been covered here, like so much else has in this century, as yet another case of American exceptionalism (but never narcissism). As on 9/11 – forget that first 9/11 in Chile – we eternally stand alone in our experiences because, by definition, we are the special ones, the ones who matter.
In the case of election meddling, however, this country just joined a moiling crowd of the interfered with – and largely by us. It was a classic case of getting a taste of one’s own medicine and not liking it one bit. It should have taught us a lesson about our own global behavior since World War II. Instead, it’s simply continued us on a path of exceptional meddling that will prove someday to have been one of the great follies in history.
The material below is a compendium of intelligence received, now known to be “laundered” through Russian Naval Intelligence on what we were told was on behalf of Snowden. Since that time, in the ensuing four plus years, we have found that a dissident FBI agent who filed suit against Director Robert Mueller for planning his assassination is likely responsible.
The narrative below includes photographs and drawings that were part of that drop, confirmed to have come from the US Department of Energy.
Some of the information may well be familiar to those who have followed the investigation. Some of the information has been superseded by corrected or more recent material. More important, much of this material was removed from publication and totally suppressed… Gordon ]
*– First published … May 20, 2014 –
Too Classified to Publish: Bush Nuclear Piracy Exposed
Russia Opens Files on Nuclear 9/11 and Israeli Proliferation
(Veterans Today — Gordon Duff) The report below is taken from an intelligence dump by Russian sources. As the origin is from an intelligence agency in the form of a “leak,” there are always questions. Thus far, we have found that not only is the majority of the material confirmed, but several solutions to serious problems involving 9/11 are included.
I have redacted little here. However, this arrived with vast supporting documentation which can, in the future, be uploaded on SCRIBD for access. One key area is that the US had supplied Israel with surplus nuclear weapons.
We have a very solid confirmation on this. Back during the 1980s, Israel showed her inventory of Davy Crockett tactical nuclear warheads to one of our editors, who at the time was a senior NATO intelligence official. These early “micro-nukes” were taken out of the US inventory in 1978 and “disappeared.”
US nuclear test that demonstrates the effects of 9/11, a pyroclastic cloud.
This highly classified report is being published unaltered, except for bad machine translation errors being repaired. My personal opinion is that this is NOT a disinformation piece, but rather represents a significant breakthrough. I believe that this is a rare glimpse behind the curtain.
I am publishing this for the use of those qualified to understand how little of this is really new. Those things that are new are groundbreaking. For those who find this all a bit over their heads, there is little I can do other than to let you know that this is the world “your elders” really live in, and that you finally have a chance to look in mom and dad’s top dresser drawer.
Too Classified to Publish
According to a retired FXX agent specializing in Israeli counter-intel: The type of nuclear devices used on 911 were a modified version of the W-54 nuclear artillery shells that were covertly provided to the Israelis between 1988 and 1998 from US surplus stockpiles illegally exported during the Bush/Clinton era.
Chemical analysis done by DOE Sandia was able to identify the chemical/radiation footprint or fingerprint of the warheads based on samples taken after 911 of the fallout at ground zero. (Editor’s note: Nuclear weapon use at ground zero is confirmed from multiple sources)
All plutonium-based warheads have a chemical fingerprint that can identify the type of design and where the PU was made and how old it is. This was the 911 blackmail on Bush 1 and 2, the illegal transfer of surplus US nuclear weapons to the Israelis, and why the continued cover up, along with the stolen gold and stock fraud that was happening on Wall Street, etc. According to file ENW57.pdf on page 66. (Editor’s note: Document received and confirmed)
Only a 2-kiloton device was needed to drop the buildings. A 2-kiloton device will produce a fireball of approx 150 to 200 feet in diameter at over 4000 degrees Centigrade – just large enough to melt the I beams of the central core of the building and drop them in place. The light flash would last less than 1 second and primarily be in the UV light range. Overpressure would only be at 60PSI max and directed upwards with the blast. See underground effect.
Fallout would be minimal and located to within ground zero range only. Radiation would drop to acceptable levels within 72 hours after the blast. Most fallout was trapped in the cement dust, thus causing all of the recent cancer deaths that we are now seeing in NYC amongst first responders. (Editor’s note: Consistent with site data)
Melted steel and iron oxide or “nano thermite” is a byproduct of the very high gamma ray / neutron flux induced into the central steel core. The radiation dissolves the steel into iron oxide, consuming the carbon and silicone in the steel. This explains the missing steel columns and the very important clue of the “vaporized’ 20-ton antenna tower atop the South tower. The upward blast of radiation literally vaporized it. Video evidence proves this to be true. (Editor’s note: Tower issue a vital one.)
The total XXOO data file from DOE Sandia on the 911 event is well over 72 MB. P.S. Snowden didn’t have a Q clearance so he missed this one. Carnaby had a pretty good stash of documents on the subject. (All under the transit stuff.) The entire nuclear nonproliferation story of stolen nuclear material coming from Russia was an Israeli cover story to hide the original source of weapons material coming from the US stockpile. (Editor’s note: Fully confirmed)
Illegal distribution of US nuclear material to foreign allies was not limited to Israel. Virtually all NATO allies were in on this scam too. Dick Cheney was the bad guy on this one. Bush2/Cheney traded nuclear pits to foreign countries as IOU’s in order to get what they wanted. Tom Countryman, a well-known Israeli operative, is curiously now in charge of N.N.P. at the State Department under Obama.(?) He was put there by Rahm Emanuel.
It appears that the weapon of choice for the Israelis was the W-54 and follow on series of nuclear pits taken from the Amarillo, Texas, storage dump. This was what Carnaby was working on for Bush senior in Houston. A total of over 350 pits were transferred to the Israelis over a 10 to 20 year period of time. The W-54 type of pit design was the most desirable, due to the 2-point implosion pit design. This is the easiest to re manufacture and modify as compared to other circular pit designs.
The pill-shaped design of the W-54 type weapon contains over 1.5 times more plutonium than a standard pit. This would allow enough Plutonium to be recovered that was still of weapons grade use, even after 32 plus years of age. Americium build-up in the pit over time eventually makes the pit unusable as a weapon, so they have a limited shelf life based on how fast or slow the Plutonium was produced in the reactor at Stanford. Usually it was about 150 days max. Irradiation time in the reactor during production determines the shelf-life of the pit as weapons grade material. All of the micro nukes used by the Israelis are re-manufactured W-54 type series devices.
These devices were used in the Bali bombing and the London bombing and in Japan on their reactors. (Editor’s note: Nuclear weapon use in Bali confirmed) Also used in Damascus, Iraq and Afghanistan by the US. (Editor’s note: Multiple confirmation including site samples.)
These are stored in most Israeli embassies for ease of deployment. The ones used on 9-11 were kept at the Israeli consulate in NYC until put in place. After 9-11, the FBI now checks all diplomatic pouches with a Geiger counter before entering or leaving the US. The South African weapons were also surplus W-54 artillery shells acquired from Israeli; and final assembly and testing was done in South Africa with Israel assistance. (Editor’s note: This explains Pelandaba production issues.)
This was done because the Israelis needed a testing ground in order to make sure that their rebuilt weapons would work as designed. (Editor’s note: Testing on Sept. 22, 1979 multiple confirmations.)
The North Korean weapons are also of the 155 mm artillery design as provided by Israel. The true North Korean nuclear weapons program is based on nuclear artillery use and not missiles. The plan is to use a massive artillery barrage on South Korea if war breaks out; this includes the use of small nuclear artillery shells to counter US tanks’ rockets and artillery.
The Saudis also have a stash of W-54s acquired from the US under Bush2. (Editor’s note: Confirmed) The Israelis have also provided them to India, Brazil, China, Taiwan, Japan, North and South Korea, etc. (Editor’s note: All but South Korea confirmed. Canada had been believed to be the source of Brazilian nuclear weapons.)
Dimona is a standard 75 megawatt thermal open top reactor as used in France for their plutonium weapons production program, their version of Stanford.
Due to over use as a fast breeder reactor by the Israelis, Dimona suffered a “steam explosion”, IE a flash over indecent due to neutron criticality back in the late 1980s under Bush 1. This shut down its operation for many years until repairs could be made. It now only operates at very low power levels due to neutron absorption damage to the containment vessel. Now mainly used for isotope production. This forced the Israelis to turn to stolen nuclear stockpiles from the US for the continuation of their nuclear program.
The Israelis knew that the nuclear material they acquired only had a limited shelf life left before it was no longer usable as weapons grade, then tried to dump it on the surplus market as fast as possible before it was of no use to them. So they dumped it on unsuspecting nations who would only sit on it and not be able to test it. These were the fissile tests in North Korea. (Editor’s note: Confirmed, multiple sources)
When everybody caught on to the scam such as Japan and Korea, (IE the Korean sub sinkings etc) they were angry because they paid big bucks for junk. This started a mini cold war with Israel and her off clients. However, with micro nukes, even as the plutonium ages, it will still fissile, producing a smaller size detonation well under 2-kiloton in size. So they can still be used as small dirty bombs or as very small tactical nukes, such as the nuclear artillery strikes on Damascus with rocket assisted W-54s. (Editor’s note: Confirmed strike, May 4, 2013) On the W-54 pit design, it is pill-shaped, and it is only about 4 inches in diameter and weighs about 24 pounds.
Most of the fuel is consumed in the plasma fireball when detonated, so there is very little plutonium fallout left to escape. If it is salted with other materials, the fallout can be even reduced to lower levels, such as in an enhanced radiation device or the so called neutron bomb. This is what was used on 9-11. The primary purpose of the nuclear weapon used on 9-11 was to produce a massive gamma ray / neutron flux that would vaporize about 150 to 300 feet of 6-inch thick steel I beams that constituted the central core of the WTC buildings. This created a free fall event as seen on TV that day. (Editor’s note: Critical information here.)
The flash would be hidden from sight due to the underground detonation. Most of the light was in the non-visible light spectrum, anyway. Over pressure would be reduced to 6 psi due to the blast traveling up the central core and neutron radiation vaporizing the TV antenna at the top of the building as see on TV. The fallout would be mainly vaporized concrete cement and iron oxide. This is why, after 9-11, they told everyone on TV that the beta radiation burns that people were getting were due to the caustic cement dust and not due to the radiation effects from the radioactive cement fallout. (Editor’s note: Fully confirmed)
The iron oxide found all over the place was what was left of the steel I beams. This was the so called Nano Thermite that was found everywhere. Fallout was limited to a 1-mile area around downtown NYC. See charts. (Editor’s note: Received)
Radiation decay was reduced to safe low levels after 72 hours, (Editor’s note: Fully confirmed) outside of ground zero itself. This is why the area was blocked off from the public for 3 days after the event, in order to let the radiation drop to safe levels.
VT: CIA Torture Report Ties Cheney/Bout to 9/11 Nukes
Information received this week from the highest levels of US counter-terrorism sources have confirmed that the reputed “Queen of Al Qaeda,” Dr. Aafia Siddiqui, a CIA torture victim now serving 87 years in an American “super-max” prison, was a CIA agent when captured and was imprisoned to prevent releasing information that could eventually lead to the arrest and conviction of then Vice President Dick Cheney.
The Cheney/Bout partnership was integral to the wholesale looting of America’s inventory of surplus and decommissioned nuclear weapons and placing dozens of nuclear warheads in the hands of rogue nations and terrorist groups.
Cheney and his henchmen were silencing critics, eliminating “loose ends” tied to Able Danger and 9/11 and completing the process of dismantling the last vestiges of representative government in the US and Western Europe. The story today ties the Valerie Plame scandal, a CIA agent exposed as retaliation at Cheney’s orders.
Our coup was when we learned that Dr. Aafia Siddiqui, termed a veritable “female bin Laden” was not only CIA but an asset for Valerie Plame in an investigation originally aimed at Saddam but that had turned around and was pointing directly at the White House.
The Plame investigation, aided by Siddiqui’s proof no “yellowcake/Al Qaeda” plot had ever existed, went much further than initially intended. Cheney was revealed to be the “handler” for now imprisoned Victor Bout, revealed by the FBI in a 2007 Bangkok briefing to be greatly responsible for supplying the nuclear weapons nukes used on the WTC and, according to FBI sources, a cruise missile as well that the FBI asserts was used on the Pentagon on 9/11.
In December 2008, voting machine hacker Michael Connell died in a plane crash within days of asking for protection, claiming Karl Rove had threatened him if he came forward regarding charges of rigging both the 2000 and 2004 presidential elections.
Thus, when Libby/Liebowitz was convicted, it was openly accepted that he was protecting Cheney from the fallout of simply “running his mouth.” In truth, as we will establish, even Cheney’s proven role in pushing America into an illegal war is only the tip of the iceberg. The Cheney/Bout partnership was integral to the wholesale looting of America’s inventory of surplus and decommissioned nuclear weapons and placing dozens of nuclear warheads in the hands of rogue nations and terrorist groups.
Bout and his fleet of transport planes carried the arms for “Charlie Wilson’s War” in Afghanistan, hauled first opium and later heroin by the ton for American school children, and was the “go to” supplier for all covert weapons for both “freedom fighters” and terrorist groups as well, at least those working for the CIA, Mossad along with British and French intelligence.
Siddiqui worked directly for Valerie Plame, a CIA agent purposefully “outed” when her husband, Ambassador Joseph Wilson, disproved White House claims of “yellowcake uranium” smuggling by Iraq. White House Security Chief, Scooter “Libby” Leibowitz was convicted of the Plame leak, although sources now confirm that the “outing” of Plame was done at the orders of Cheney and was passed on to the media by retired General Paul Vallely, a Fox News employee who has recently been filmed meeting with leaders of the ISIS/Al Qaeda terror group in Turkey and reputedly Syria as well.
When Plame was “burned,” her assistant, Dr. Aafia, was then listed as part of the now debunked yellowcake “network” and fled to Pakistan, where she was kidnapped and taken to Bagram Air Force Base, as outlined in CIA torture records. Sources close to Plame tell us that the film, “Fair Game,” a highly fictionalized account of her story starring Naomi Watts and Sean Penn, but never promoted and barely released, was produced in order to “settle accounts.” The producers of the film are Israeli nationals; and sources confirm the film project was undertaken at the request of Israeli intelligence sources as a way of laundering “hush money.”
UK TELEGRAPH GETS IT VERY WRONG
This week, the UK Telegraph, using sources from the Daily Mail, published a lengthy article describing “convicted terrorist” Dr. Aafia Siddiqui’s process of radicalization and, quite frankly, defending her rendition kidnapping, her 5 years of rape and torture, and the murder of her children by CIA-paid contractors. If only this were the whole story, a cover up of torture as part of a war on terror. It is not. The Telegraph has a long reputation of being a cover story “drop box” for MI-6, so the story was passed around quickly among those who take a special interest in such things.
Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger of the Reagan era was arrested at his home one morning by a similar operational unit for crimes committed in the Iran-Contra Affair and was convicted of perjury and obstruction of justice. Public and secret pardons by Bush (41) cover not only Weinberger but up to 138 Reagan officials.
After the 2000 US presidential election, where George Bush (43) was “appointed” compliments of a Supreme Court ruling that stopped the Florida vote count, loyal elements in defense and security became convinced the election began a coup. In December 2008, voting machine hacker Michael Connell died in a plane crash within days of asking for protection, claiming Karl Rove had threatened him if he came forward regarding charges of rigging both the 2000 and 2004 presidential elections.
For those in Defense and Intelligence, the “convenience” of 9/11, however, represented something more than a power grab. Nuclear investigators were immediately dispatched, gathering samples and radiation readings, including one VT editor, a nuclear physicist and IAEA investigator, who is photographed at “ground zero” dressed as a utility worker. This team is responsible for the DOE 9/11 Report received by White House, Pentagon and Congressional leaders in 2003.
When the report was never made public, the team released the highly classified photographs depicting the huge nuclear crater with swirls of melted granite. Later, after the (alleged/now disproven..really from a dissident FBI agent) Snowden leak and Veterans Today publishing of key report components, the investigative team came forward, not only confirming their findings of nuclear weapons use on 9/11 but continued their work using highly classified documents published by Russian nuclear investigator Dimitri Khalezov.
When Israeli teams, then living in safe houses in New Jersey and under surveillance by FBI agent Mike Dick’s teams, moved the nuclear weapons into the World Trade Center parking lots in white moving vans as told of in the DOE report, it was not known that the parking places chosen had a strategic purpose.
The DOE teams were, at that time, unaware that the huge freon tanks, technology no longer in use, that cooled the towers, were located under the parking places chosen for the devices, described in the report as “two stage nuclear thermobaric weapons.” In subsequent revisions, after the nuclear design teams at Los Alamos National Laboratories read the Khalezov report, the energy weapon effect noted by many including Dr. Judy Wood could finally be explained.
In a report edited by members of the original Department of Energy 9/11 investigative team, the 26,000 gallon freon tanks provided a massive deuterium boost that traveled up the elevator shafts, destroying the structural integrity of the Twin Towers. From Veterans Today August 28, 2014:
The third really big one was placed over the air conditioning Freon storage tanks in the utility room, or just under it in the utility pipe gallery, as stated by Dmitry. This one made the giant crater formations left under the buildings foundations and was the cause of the melted steel and thermal effects seen on 9-11.
When the 1.5kt nuke went off next to the storage tanks containing 26 tons of liquid Freon, it turned it into Hydrogen Floride (H2F), or in the nuclear weapons industry, it is called Deuterium Fluoride (DF), the stuff that hydrogen bombs are made of. This produced the desired thermal effects needed to vaporize the central core and over half of the Twin Towers in less than 10 seconds. No other explosive device could do that. Dmitry was off only on the size of the weapons used, but all other data checks out correctly. He was too correct, so his source was an inside player. This is why D.O.J wants him!!
If his story were untrue, then they would not go to this much trouble to keep him locked up in a Thailand jail waiting extradition to the USA. That fact alone tells you something BIG!!
Blast Effects. When the 1.5KT nuke went off under buildings 1 and 2, it sucked most of the 26 tons of liquid Freon from the cooling system into the fireball. Due to thermal heat of 4 million degrees in the center of the fireball and neutron absorption, the Freon was split and then fused into Deuterium Fluoride…
As in the IVY Mike nuclear Pacific test in 1952 of the first Hydrogen Bomb — producing the massive over yield due to the extra Freon being converted into extra Deuterium. On 9-11, this acted as extra external “Deuterium Boost Gas”, boosting the Thermal Yield of the 1.5 KT weapon at least 10 to a maximum of 100 times. 15 to 150 KT thermal output not in blast energy.
That would put the overall “thermal energy” released between 15KT and up to 150KT at 100% efficiency. Most likely closer to 10% efficiency would be more practical. This is a crude Teller “Lair Cake or Alarm Clock” boosted nuclear fission design only used back in the 1950s test shots. Dmitry’s claims of 150 KT thermal was a bit too big. However, if the weapon had been twice this size — 3KT vs 1.5 KT — it would have taken out the lower half of Manhattan, including the entire Wall Street financial district, and the fallout would have taken out half of NYC, and not by accident!!!!
It was designed that way. Over 90% of this energy is released as fast neutrons and Infrared energy, with accompanying Alpha, Beta and Gamma radiation. Less than 10% was in mechanical blast energy or over pressure. Most of this was absorbed in the ground as shock waves and created the massive cavities left below the buildings. The off-centered large cavity was located just below the Freon cooling plant storage tank location, which is a big forensic clue as to the energy source used on that day.
The mostly unburnt and highly-ionized Deuterium Fluoride gas (Formally known as Freon-12) produced by the blast, (over 20 tons of it) was trapped in the building debris piles and accounted for all of the post 9-11 thermal effects of molten steel, hot spots, and out-gassing of very caustic gasses, ETC. This stuff, due to neutron excitation and very high ionization levels, will stay very hot until the appropriate neutron-absorbing chemicals are added to the ground in order to stop the ongoing low level neutron chain reactions from occurring, similar to what is happening in Japan with their nuclear 3-11 disaster.
After 9/11, the US set out to create what appeared to be a worldwide terror organization, in order to justify both a political crackdown within the US and, as had been made public on many occasions by former NATO head General Wesley Clark… the long planned military takeover of the Middle East and Central Asia.
Part of this plot involved creating a cover story involving 500 tons of “yellowcake uranium”, supposedly bought by Al Qaeda and transported to Iraq to supply a nuclear program later found to never have existed. The Bush White House, at the orders of Vice President Dick Cheney, went to a terrorist group within the Italian intelligence agency, SISMI, part of the group responsible for the Gladio terror bombings and the kidnapping and murder of Italian Prime Minister Aldo Moro.
They created documents outlining imaginary transactions and sent them to CIA headquarters in Rome. SISMI chief Nicolo Pollari took the reports directly to the White House, where Cheney asked friends within the CIA and Department of Energy — part of a covert working team that included arms smuggler Victor Bout — to prepare reports citing the severity of the threat posed by these known forged reports.
A US Army intelligence group working within Israel, headed by Colonel James Hanke, had discovered that the nuclear weapons facility at Dimona had suffered a catastrophic accident between 1988 and 1990. Israel’s nuclear weapons inventory could no longer be maintained, and expanded from domestically produced weapons grade nuclear material. Israel’s complicity was proven when, according to sources within the IAEA and Able Danger team, a combined operation between the US Department of Defense and Department of Justice, initially headed by FBI Agent John O’Neill, had discovered discrepancies in the US nuclear weapons inventory.
It was not just 350 missing nuclear pits, but fully one third of America’s post SALT II (Strategic Arms Limitations Talks) inventory. The records of our nuclear weapons inventory had been systematically sabotaged to hide this attack on America’s weapons inventory, or so they thought.
Able Danger established the presence of an espionage organization in the United States that was answerable personally to Benjamin Netanyahu. The organization included the then head of the Dept. of Energy, the AIPAC Lobby, the Anti-Defamation League, key commanders of America’s nuclear forces, the Joint Special Operations command under VP Dick Cheney, and members of the International Atomic Energy Agency, a UN organization.
Their investigation had tied corrupt officials at the highest levels of the US Department of Energy to the leak of classified nuclear “pit” configuration data and altering records of decommissioned nuclear weapons. Three hundred fifty W54 nuclear warheads were missing from inventories at the Pantex nuclear facility in Amarillo, Texas.
An investigation team led by Roland Carnaby, the CIA agent killed in a mysterious shooting in 2008, discovered that the missing “pits” had been stolen and taken to a nearby meat packing facility, where they were sorted using leaked DOE data in order to allow them to be safely melted down and reconfigured to replace the depleted Israeli stockpile. Investigators from the DOE and IAEA confirm that weapons from this stolen stockpile were used in the demolition of the World Trade Center on 9/11/2001 — nuclear “pits” originally produced at the Hanford DOE facility in Washington.
This information was part of the highly classified 2003 9/11 report given to congressional and White House leaders only, and later leaked by Russian Naval Intelligence, believed to have been among a trove of documents received from Edward Snowden. (later found to be a cover story to protect a real whistleblower)
In March 2013, a group of business executives meeting in Tulsa, Oklahoma, received a briefing on the 2003 “Nuclear 9/11” report as part of a “Threat Assessment Conference”, where Veterans Today staff were among the presenters. The briefing also included a version of the now famous “Shrimpton nuclear scare” story, confirming the recovery of a missing nuclear weapon somewhere in the EU in 2012. This was the biggest collection of private jets ever to grace Oklahoma.
9/11 AND AFTERMATH
Leaked documents on the Able Danger investigation, received in September 2014, revealed that most investigation functions had ended in 1998 at the request of President Clinton, then under impeachment threat tied to his relationship with Monica Lewinsky, in a reputed Mossad “honey trap.” It was Clinton’s gutting of Able Danger that may well have made 9/11 possible, leaving in place Israeli and Saudi teams, the Cheney/Bout organization and the AIPAC intel coordinators.
Investigative chief and FBI Special Agent John O’Neill left government service and pursued leads until his untimely death during the 9/11 “event”. According to a 2005 report, thirty-five of the Able Danger investigators were also killed on 9/11 when the Pentagon office they were called to for an emergency briefing by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Myer, (who did not show up for the meeting and did not die, a lucky day for him) was demolished by an airliner, though little or no physical evidence of such a happenstance exists. (Myer took over the JCOS before 9/11, but was confirmed afterward. Prior to 9/11, it was Myer that facilitated the destruction of nuclear weapon records while heading the Pentagon’s nuclear accounting group.)
After 1998, the FBI investigation team was divided into two units under the supervision of Special Agent Mike Dick; one team was tracking arms dealer Victor Bout, and was coordinated with IAEA investigators. The second unit investigated the theft of the “pit matching” documents and centered on the American Israeli Public Affairs Committee, AIPAC, eventually leading to the arrest of leaders of that group. Charges were later dropped when the White House refused to turn over required evidence; and Attorney General John Ashcroft, one of the key planners of the CIA torture program, ordered an end to the investigation. Witness statements included testimony indicating White House officials had passed key nuclear secrets to Israeli embassy representatives at a Washington cocktail party in the presence of both Paul Wolfowitz and Condoleezza Rice.
The second unit, assisted by CIA agent Roland Carnaby, followed the theft of nuclear weapons from the sorting facility near Amarillo to a fertilizer plant outside Waco, Texas. In April 2014, as Snowden reputedly handed Able Danger documents to Russian intelligence, the plant where the nuclear weapons were stored, the West Fertilizer Plant, was destroyed in a mysterious explosion.
The entire operation was run by Victor Bout, working directly for the office of the Vice President of the United States, according to private sources with access to the Plame/Siddiqui investigation. The nuclear pits had been moved by truck to the Port of Houston, where they had been placed on ships and transferred to the Canary Islands and later to Mauritania. The weapons were, according to Able Danger documents, stored at a mine controlled by former South African Prime Minister De Klerk inside a region controlled by the rebel Polisario Front. From there, weapons were sold to Taiwan, South Korea, Saudi Arabia and other nations, along with restocking Israel.
Other weapons were set aside for use by intelligence agencies. IAEA sources report weapons from Hanford/Pantex were used for the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995, at the Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia in 1996, the destruction of the World Trade Center in 2001, and the Bali bombing in 2005. The IAEA confirms up to 50 nuclear weapons have been used surreptitiously since 1945, often in configurations that minimize blast and radiation.
THE CIA’S FORGOTTEN CHILDREN
There are strange parallels in the story of two accused “Al Qaeda” operatives. While the general public thinks of Al Qaeda as a terror group, in truth, according to Able Danger documents, Al Qaeda is a joint operational sector of Saudi, Israeli and US intelligence. This dirty little secret has compromised American security greatly, due to the blackmailing position both of these countries have had over the US.
Two of the major “terror figures” of Al Qaeda, Dr. Aafia Siddiqui and Osama bin Laden, have been confirmed, at the highest levels, to be CIA operatives. After 9/11 both fled… Dr. Aafia to Karachi and bin Laden, who had recently received kidney treatments at the National Naval Medical Center in Bethesda, Maryland, where members of congress and top VIPs receive their care, to Tora Bora. Bin Laden died of complications from advanced kidney disease on December 13, 2001, after denying any involvement in 9/11 and advising those concerned to “look closer to home” (CIA FOIA Press Release dated 24 September, 2001.) Prime Minister of Pakistan Benazir Bhutto claims Osama Bin Laden was murdered by Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh long before 2007, one of the men convicted of killing U.S. journalist Daniel Pearl. Her own assassination soon followed.
The curious story of Bin Laden and his second “death” in Pakistan is similar to that of Aafia Siddiqui with her reputed murderous attack on he CIA captors during a waterboarding session at Bagram Air Force Base. Prior to the release of the recent and highly controversial CIA torture report, the reputed actual “re-killer” of bin Laden came forward. The story, as we are told, has an aging bin Laden in the upper floor of a home in Abbottabad, Pakistan. Bin Laden is said to have leapt to his feet, grasping an AK47 in one hand while holding a hostage in another. While standing on a bed, bin Laden is brought down in a hail of gunfire, like something out of a cowboy film.
The Aafia story is if anything worse.
We are told Dr. Aafia, confined to a wheelchair, in this case “literally” held down by handcuff “tie raps”, was brought in for a waterboarding session. The US Air Force facility had been hosting summary execution and torture sessions for Aafia and other prisoners for years. Aafia had been raped repeatedly. She was down to 80 pounds and unable to walk.
There the story, an analog of the bin Laden tale, gets more bizarre. Dr. Aafia is said to have broken her tie wraps, listed as “ISO 527-1:2012 standard,” in a fit of rage. There were five men in the room, most over 200 pounds, four of whom were “special operations trained”, including one US Navy Seal, one CIA agent and two FBI agents. The fifth member was a “translator,” please pay attention as this will be an important point. The crippled 80-pound torture and rape victim is reputed to have knocked all four men to the ground, seizing an M4 carbine from one of them. According to transcripts, in order to save the lives of the four “terror war-fighters”, the “translator”, using his weapon shot Dr. Aafia in the abdomen.
This is the crime Dr. Aafia was convicted of, not terrorism but resisting torture. Now here comes the most curious part of all. Dr. Aafia lived in the United States for 11 years, the wife of a Boston anesthesiologist. Aafia taught at MIT, where she received her doctorate in microbiology before joining the CIA. Aafia had spoken English all her life, published in English and taught in English at one of the most prestigious universities in the world. Why did she need a translator? You just can’t make this stuff up…
“As far as I'm concerned, it's a damned shame that a field as potentially dynamic and vital as journalism should be overrun with dullards, bums, and hacks, hag-ridden with myopia, apathy, and complacence, and generally stuck in a bog of stagnant mediocrity.” -Hunter Thompson