September 4, 2020
The Trump administration has had the United States opt out of the COVAX alliance, an initiative spearheaded by the Bill Gates global vaccine alliance called Gavi to produce and distribute a coronavirus vaccine.
During the summer, US president Donald Trump “donated more to Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, to prevent the spread of infectious diseases worldwide.” He did so in a statement of support for Gavi at the public Gavi pledge conference, which was hosted by the United Kingdom, on June 4th. Bill and Melinda Gates co-founded the Gavi alliance in the year 2000, it’s a public-private partnership that claims to support “global health-system strengthening and vaccine deployment for infectious diseases worldwide.” (source) Here’s a video clip of Trump talking about his decision.
Now, it has come to our attention that president Trump and his administration will not participate in a collaborative global initiative to develop and distribute a coronavirus vaccine that’s headed by the COVAX initiative. The COVAX initiative is spearheaded by Gavi, and according to their website:
The ACT Accelerator is a ground-breaking global collaboration to accelerate the development, production, and equitable access to COVID-19 tests, treatments, and vaccines. COVAX is co-led by Gavi, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) and WHO. Its aim is to accelerate the development and manufacture of COVID-19 vaccines, and to guarantee fair and equitable access for every country in the world.
It’s not quite clear if president Trump is halting his initial payment to Gavi mentioned above, or simply choosing not to participate in the COVAX effort that is being led by the Gavi alliance.
Multiple media outlets are reporting that Trump is opting out OF THE COVAX effort because the organization is tied to the World Health Organization (WHO), who Trump and multiple other world ‘leaders’ have criticized for the way they’ve handled the Covid-19 pandemic.
Not only have some politicians been quite critical of the WHO during the pandemic, a number of scientists and doctors have been as well. For example, Michael Levitt, a Biophysicist and a professor of structural biology at Stanford University, criticized the WHO as well as Facebook for censoring different information and informed perspectives regarding the Coronavirus. YouTube is also actively banning any content that contradicts anything that the World Health Organization (WHO) with regards to the new coronavirus.
A documentary called “trustWHO” explores the influence that the pharmaceutical industry, among others, has on the World Health Organization. It was recently banned by Vimeo. The documentary has been fact-checked and approved by lawyers, experts in the medical field and even by key executives of the WHO itself. The documentary simply investigated how efficiency and transparency of the WHO are undermined by corporate influences. You can read more about that here.
I also recently published a piece about Wikileaks regarding recent posts they made pertaining to documents they released nearly a decade ago . The documents highlight the influence that pharmaceutical companies have on health policy set by the World Health Organization (WHO).
More than 500 German doctors & scientists have signed on as representatives of an organization called the “Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee” to investigate what’s happening on our planet with regards to COVID-19 because they are coming across information and data that also contradicts that of the WHO. You can read more about that story here.
The Bulgarian Pathology Association has taken the stance that the testing used to identify the new coronavirus in patients is “scientifically meaningless.” This comes after the president of the Bulgarian Pathology Association, Dr. Stoian Alexov, said that European pathologists haven’t identified any antibodies that are specific for SARS-CoV-2.
Again, I just wanted to provide a few of many examples of what you never hear within the mainstream with regards to the WHO. These organizations are independent, they have no oversight and nobody is ‘watching’ and ‘auditing’ them. They hold a tremendous amount of power and influence and are portrayed as our most trusted body when it comes to global health matters. The issue for many is the fact that the modern day world of medicine and health care is now dominated by big pharmaceutical interests, money and profit often come before health, at least according to to my research.
Why would information coming from some of the world’s most respected scientists in the field be censored simply because it contradicts what we are getting from the WHO?
With such a lack of transparency on our planet, it’s hard to know what’s really going on.
Why This Is Important: Vaccines are often portrayed as a miracle medicine, but vaccines are not a one sized fits all product. This is evident by the fact that nearly $4 billion has been paid out to families of vaccine injured children via the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA).As astronomical as the monetary awards are, they’re even more alarming considering that only an estimated 1% of vaccine injuries are even reported to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS).
There are multiple issues with different vaccines. For example, multiple lawsuits have been filed against Merck for their HPV vaccine. This vaccine has caused multiple disabilities and deaths, and according to the act mentioned above, it’s responsible for at least 64,000 adverse reactions in the United States alone. You can read more about that here.
As of 2/5/19, the cumulative raw count of adverse events from measles, mumps, and rubella vaccines alone was: 93,929 adverse events, 1,810 disabilities, 6,902 hospitalizations, and 463 deaths. (VAERS)
A 2010 HHS pilot study by the Federal Agency for Health Care Research (AHCR) found that 1 in every 39 vaccines causes injury, a shocking comparison to the claims from the CDC of 1 in every million. You can access that and read more about it here.
Big media also seems to portray the idea that the majority of doctors and scientists support vaccinations. This simply isn’t true either, as was emphasized at the World Health Organizations (WHO) conference on vaccine safety.
Professor Heidi Larson, a Professor of Anthropology and the Risk and Decision Scientist Director at the Vaccine Confidence Project emphasized at the conference that:The other thing that’s a trend, and an issue, is not just confidence in providers but confidence of health care providers, we have a very wobbly health professional frontline that is starting to question vaccines and the safety of vaccines.
You can access a link to that conference and read more about it here.
One study (of many) published in the journal EbioMedicine outlines this point, stating in the introduction:
Over the past two decades several vaccine controversies have emerged in various countries, including France, inducing worries about severe adverse effects and eroding confidence in health authorities, experts, and science (Larson et al., 2011). These two dimensions are at the core of the vaccine hesitancy (VH) observed in the general population. VH is defined as delay in acceptance of vaccination, or refusal, or even acceptance with doubts about its safety and benefits, with all these behaviors and attitudes varying according to context, vaccine, and personal profile, despite the availability of vaccine services (Group, 2014,Larson et al., 2014, Dubé et al., 2013). VH presents a challenge to physicians who must address their patients’ concerns about vaccines and ensure satisfactory vaccination coverage.
The Physicians for Informed Consent recently put out some excellent downloadable PDF’s with regards to the MMR vaccine. There are four of them that all present different points presenting information that, again, is real, factual and science based yet never presented to the masses.
- MEASLES: What Parents Need To Know
- MMR VACCINE: Is It Safer Than Measles?
- Waning Immunity & The MMR Vaccine
- FAQ’s: The MMR Vaccine versus the Measles
Why doesn’t anybody know about these things? When I ask this question to myself, this quote comes to mind:
Even the pharmaceutical companies have been able to purchase congress. They’re the largest lobbying entity in Washington D.C.. They have more lobbyists in Washington D.C. than there are congressman and senators combined. They give twice to congress what the next largest lobbying entity is, which is oil and gas… Imagine the power they exercise over both republicans and democrats. They’ve captured them (our regulatory agencies) and turned them into sock puppets. They’ve compromised the press… and they destroy the publications that publish real science. – Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (source)
When it comes to the new coronavirus vaccine, not much is known about it and apparently it is utilizing a new method, something that’s never been seen before. We already have a large lack of safety testing with the vaccines currently on the schedule, so we can’t expect much of that (safety testing) with a coronavirus vaccine. It’s going to be interesting to see what happens when it comes out.
The Takeaway: Why does mainstream media label those who question the safety of vaccines as “anti-vax conspiracy theorists” instead of actually addressing the concerns people have with vaccines? Why do they constantly use ridicule, hate and shame? Should we not be free to choose what we do with our own body and what we put into it, especially when the ‘medications’ being offered aren’t put through appropriate safety testing? What’s going on here? Why is there a digital fact checker going around the internet censoring information that doesn’t fit the frame?